助手标题
全文文献 工具书 数字 学术定义 翻译助手 学术趋势 更多
查询帮助
意见反馈
共[211]条 当前为第1条到20条[由于搜索限制,当前仅支持显示前5页数据]
 

相关语句
未完全匹配句对
    Midazolam and Fentanyl Interactions with Emulsified Isoflurane
    乳化异氟醚与咪唑安定和芬太尼的相互作用
    Effect of Ketamine--Droperidol--Fentanyl Combined Anesthesia on Ventilation
    氯胺酮-氟哌啶、芬太尼复合麻醉对通气量的影响
    Clinical Study of Epidural Fentanyl-lidocaine Mixture
    芬太尼应用于妇科手术利多卡因硬膜外麻醉的临床研究
    Epidural Fentanyl/0.125% Bupivaine Combinations for Analgesia during Labor
    硬膜外芬太尼/0.125%布比卡因混合用于分娩止痛的临床观察
    Effect of morphine, fentanyl and naloxone on coronary blood flow in the dog.
    大剂量吗啡、芬太尼及纳络酮对犬冠脉血流影响的实验研究
    ANALGESIC EFFECTS OF CONTINUOS EPIDURAL INFUSING OF BUPIVACAINE AND FENTANYL MIXTURE AFTER THORACOTOMY
    剖胸术后硬膜外持续输注布比卡因和芬太尼镇痛
    Study of fentanyl/Pethidine induced Spasm of the sphincter of oddi
    芬太尼/哌替啶致Oddi括约肌痉挛的探讨
    Influence of Anesthetic Propofol and Fentanyl on Trace Element Fe in Whole Blood
    异丙酚芬太尼全麻对人体内微量元素铁的影响
    In PF group,anesthesia induction was performed by propofol and fentanyl,and anesthesia was maintained with bolus doses of fentanyl (2 μg/kg) plus infusion of propofol at a rate of 80μg/(kg·min).
    PF组采用丙泊酚和芬太尼诱导,以丙泊酚80μg/(kg.min)和间断推注芬太尼2μg/kg维持。
    Conclusion Remifentanil at a dose of 0.16μg/(kg·min) plus propofol at a rate of 80μg/(kg·min) led to rapid recovery of consciousness from anesthesia, good control of hemodynamic responses, and similar side effects in patients undergoing surgery for intracranial tumors compared with giving intravenously bolus doses of fentanyl (2μg/kg) plus propofol.
    结论与丙泊酚-芬太尼静脉复合麻醉相比,丙泊酚80μg/(kg.min)和瑞芬太尼0.16μg/(kg.min)静脉复合麻醉苏醒更加迅速,能更好地控制术中血压变化,而且并不增加不良反应发生率。
    Anesthesia was induced with midazolam 0.03mg/kg in both groups,and fentanyl 2μg/kg(i.v.) was given in fentanyl group or sulfentanyl 0.2μg/kg(i.v.)
    两组病人均静脉滴注咪唑安定0.03mg/kg,随后芬太尼组静脉注射芬太尼2μg/kg,舒芬太尼组静注舒芬太尼0.2μg/kg。
    In Group R,fentanyl was replaced by remifentanil.
    R组用瑞芬太尼替代芬太尼;
    The quantity of remifentanil used in group RF was significantly lower than in group R and the quantity of fentanyl used in group RF was significantly lower than in group F(P<0.05).
    RF组瑞芬太尼用量与R组相比明显减少(P<0.05),RF组芬太尼用量与F组相比明显减少(P<0.05)。
    Induced drugs of general anaesthesia were Fentanyl 3μg·kg-1,Propofol 1~1.5mg·kg-1,Succinycholine 2mg·kg-1. Group B: Fentanyl was not used in Induction and maintenance of general anesthesia and replaced by lidocaine 1~1.5mg·kg-1,other conditions were similar to group A.
    全身麻醉诱导药物为芬太尼3μg·kg-1,异丙酚1~1.5mg·kg-1,琥珀胆碱2mg·kg-1。 B组:诱导药物中不使用芬太尼,用利多卡因1~1.5mg·kg-1代替,术中也不使用芬太尼,其余条件同A组。
    Group C: After epidural puncture at T8-9, Induced drugs of general anaesthesia were Fentanyl 3μg·kg-1,Propofol 2~2.5mg·kg-1,Succinycholine 2mg·kg-1,fentanyl was used if necessary.
    C组:在T8-9行硬膜外穿刺,之后行全身麻醉诱导,诱导药物为芬太尼3μg·kg-1,异丙酚2~2.5mg·kg-1,琥珀胆碱2mg·kg-1,必要时可加芬太尼2~3μg·kg-1。
    Group D:fentanyl was not used in induction and during operation, which being replaced by lidocaine 1~1.5mg·kg-1 in induction. Other conditions were similar to group C.
    D组:诱导药物中不使用芬太尼,用利多卡因1~1.5mg·kg-1代替,术中也不使用芬太尼,其余条件同C组。
    Results Mean artery pressure(MAP),heart rate(HR) in fentanyl group during opening or closing skull or extubation were significantly higher than basic evaluations(P<0.05),but sufentanil group and remifentanil group were lower than basic evaluations during opening or closing skull and intracranial period(P<0.05);
    结果芬太尼在开颅、关颅、拔管时平均动脉压(MAP)、心率(HR)均明显高于基础值(P<0.05),舒芬太尼、瑞芬太尼在开颅、颅内手术期、关颅均低于基础值(P<0.05);
    MAP and HR of fentanyl group in every intracranial episodes were higher than sufenanil group and remifentanil group(P<0.05),but remifentanil group was significantly lower than sufentanil group during opening skull or intracranial period(P<0.05);
    颅内手术各期芬太尼的MAP、HR值均高于舒芬太尼、瑞芬太尼组(P<0.05),而在开颅、颅内手术期瑞芬太尼要明显低于舒芬太尼组(P<0.05);
    5 minutes after extubation,OAAS grades of fentanyl group were lowest(2.0±0.3). There was no variance between sufentanil group and remifentanil group(P>0.05);
    在拔管5min OAAS评分芬太尼组最低,为2.0±0.3(P<0.05),而舒芬太尼、瑞芬太尼组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);
    VAS grades of sufentanil group at 1 h,2 h,4 h points after operations was significantly lower than fentanyl group and remifentanil group(P<0.05). 12 h point was the peak,no statistic variance after 8 h;
    但术后1 h、2 h4、h舒芬太尼组VAS疼痛评分明显低于芬太尼、瑞芬太尼组(P<0.05),12 h达到高峰,8 h后差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);
 

首页上一页12345下一页尾页 

 
CNKI主页设CNKI翻译助手为主页 | 收藏CNKI翻译助手 | 广告服务 | 英文学术搜索
版权图标  2008 CNKI-中国知网
京ICP证040431号 互联网出版许可证 新出网证(京)字008号
北京市公安局海淀分局 备案号:110 1081725
版权图标 2008中国知网(cnki) 中国学术期刊(光盘版)电子杂志社