助手标题  
全文文献 工具书 数字 学术定义 翻译助手 学术趋势 更多
查询帮助
意见反馈
   衡平法所有权 的翻译结果: 查询用时:0.008秒
图标索引 在分类学科中查询
所有学科
更多类别查询

图标索引 历史查询
 

衡平法所有权
相关语句
  “衡平法所有权”译为未确定词的双语例句
     Neither the \! double ownership" in the Germanic Property Law nor the legal title nor the equitable title in the trust system is in the same meaning as the ownership in the Roman Real Law. The so called \!one thing more rights" in the Germanic Real Law is only a superficial phenomenon.
     日尔曼财产法中的双重所有权与英美信托制度中的普通法所有权和衡平法所有权都不是罗马法意义上的所有权 ,所谓的“一物多权”只是一种表面现象。
短句来源
  相似匹配句对
     On Re-engineering of Ownership
     所有权构造论
短句来源
     On Ownership
     论所有权
短句来源
     Trusts Without Equity: Expansion of the Notion of Trust and China Trust Law Opportunities and Challenges
     失去衡平法的信托
短句来源
     On Derivation of British Equity
     论英国衡平法的起源
短句来源
     In Common Law, the trustee is the nominal owner of the trust property, and the beneficiary is the real owner who is entitled to the benefit from the trust property.
     换言之,受托人是普通法上的所有者,受益人是衡平法上的所有者。 这就是构筑英美信托制度的“双重所有权”理论。
短句来源
查询“衡平法所有权”译词为用户自定义的双语例句

    我想查看译文中含有:的双语例句
例句
为了更好的帮助您理解掌握查询词或其译词在地道英语中的实际用法,我们为您准备了出自英文原文的大量英语例句,供您参考。
  equitable ownership
Under English law it is necessary to distinguish legal ownership from equitable ownership.
      


There is no absolute land ownership but only absolute movables ownerhsip in either Roman Real Law or Germanic Property Law. There are only differences in propertys utilizing pattern between the two laws and the generally accepted view, that the Roman Law centers on ownership while the Germanic Law on the propertys utilizing, should be clarified. Neither the \!double ownership" in the Germanic Property Law nor the legal title nor the equitable title in the trust system is in the same meaning as the ownership...

There is no absolute land ownership but only absolute movables ownerhsip in either Roman Real Law or Germanic Property Law. There are only differences in propertys utilizing pattern between the two laws and the generally accepted view, that the Roman Law centers on ownership while the Germanic Law on the propertys utilizing, should be clarified. Neither the \!double ownership" in the Germanic Property Law nor the legal title nor the equitable title in the trust system is in the same meaning as the ownership in the Roman Real Law. The so called \!one thing more rights" in the Germanic Real Law is only a superficial phenomenon. The basic difference between the two property laws lies in that the Continental Law is statute law the Common Law is case law. The basic difference is the answer to all the related questions. \ \ [

没有绝对意义的不动产所有权 ,只有绝对意义的动产所有权 ,罗马物权法与日尔曼财产法均是如此 ;两大财产法只存在财产利用方式上的区别 ,而非一以所有为中心 ,一以利用为中心 ;日尔曼财产法中的双重所有权与英美信托制度中的普通法所有权和衡平法所有权都不是罗马法意义上的所有权 ,所谓的“一物多权”只是一种表面现象。两大法系财产法最根本的区别还是一为制定法 ,一为判例法。这一根本区别是所有相关问题的答案

 
图标索引 相关查询

 


 
CNKI小工具
在英文学术搜索中查有关衡平法所有权的内容
在知识搜索中查有关衡平法所有权的内容
在数字搜索中查有关衡平法所有权的内容
在概念知识元中查有关衡平法所有权的内容
在学术趋势中查有关衡平法所有权的内容
 
 

CNKI主页设CNKI翻译助手为主页 | 收藏CNKI翻译助手 | 广告服务 | 英文学术搜索
版权图标  2008 CNKI-中国知网
京ICP证040431号 互联网出版许可证 新出网证(京)字008号
北京市公安局海淀分局 备案号:110 1081725
版权图标 2008中国知网(cnki) 中国学术期刊(光盘版)电子杂志社