助手标题  
全文文献 工具书 数字 学术定义 翻译助手 学术趋势 更多
查询帮助
意见反馈
   法律现象 在 刑法 分类中 的翻译结果: 查询用时:0.009秒
图标索引 在分类学科中查询
所有学科
刑法
法理、法史
民商法
经济法
诉讼法与司法制度
更多类别查询

图标索引 历史查询
 

法律现象
相关语句
  law phenomenon
    The essay, by interpreting the law phenomenon accordingto modern criminal spirit, deems that compulsive sexual behavior within marriage doesn t infringe upon sexual right of women, and should not be sentenced as a crime. But the wrongdoer should assume civil or moral obligation.
    从现代刑法精神的角度来解读婚内强迫性行为这一法律现象,认为婚内强迫性行为侵犯的不是妇女的性的权利,因而,不构成强奸罪,行为人只应该承担相应的民事责任或道德责任,而不应承担刑事责任。
短句来源
    As a kind of law phenomenon coexisting with class society, Capital punishment has always been an important component of penalty system .
    死刑作为一种与阶级社会相伴生的法律现象,数千年来一直是刑罚体系的重要组成部分。
短句来源
    Criminal is a symbol of behavior to harm society,and it is one of behavior of anti-society. Criminal is not social but a law phenomenon. This behavior contains breaking law,harming to society and being punished.
    犯罪是一种特定的危害社会行为的符号,是反社会的行为方式之一,不仅仅是一种社会现象,也是一种法律现象,该行为包括刑事违法性的法律内容与严重社会危害性、应受刑罚处罚性的社会内容。
短句来源
  “法律现象”译为未确定词的双语例句
    Along with development of modern criminal law, Overlap of Articles of Law has been a common phenol then on in criminal law, Though it was derived from, static legislating phenomenon, Overlap of Article of Law will become dynamic application of law in practice.
    随着现代刑事法治的发展,法条竞合成为一种普遍存在的刑事法律现象。 法条竞合,虽然缘起于静态的立法现象,但最终体现为实践中的动态法律评价问题。
短句来源
    The crime conversion is a widespread and existent phenomenon in criminal law. And the converted crime was initiated by Chinese scholars as the notional category of criminal law.
    犯罪转化是普遍存在的法律现象,而转化犯这一概念则是我国刑法学者的首创。
短句来源
查询“法律现象”译词为用户自定义的双语例句

    我想查看译文中含有:的双语例句
例句
为了更好的帮助您理解掌握查询词或其译词在地道英语中的实际用法,我们为您准备了出自英文原文的大量英语例句,供您参考。
  law phenomenon
More single-molecule experiments on additional systems are certainly needed to validate the generality of the power law phenomenon.
      


Whether compulsive sexual behavior within marriage exists has been a controversial issue in criminology. The essay, by interpreting the law phenomenon accordingto modern criminal spirit, deems that compulsive sexual behavior within marriage doesn t infringe upon sexual right of women, and should not be sentenced as a crime. But the wrongdoer should assume civil or moral obligation. On basis of this point of view, the author thinks that this behavior, as a non - crime, is in accordance with modern criminal spirit,...

Whether compulsive sexual behavior within marriage exists has been a controversial issue in criminology. The essay, by interpreting the law phenomenon accordingto modern criminal spirit, deems that compulsive sexual behavior within marriage doesn t infringe upon sexual right of women, and should not be sentenced as a crime. But the wrongdoer should assume civil or moral obligation. On basis of this point of view, the author thinks that this behavior, as a non - crime, is in accordance with modern criminal spirit, such as justice, leniency and economy.

婚内存否强奸,一直是刑法学争议的问题。从现代刑法精神的角度来解读婚内强迫性行为这一法律现象,认为婚内强迫性行为侵犯的不是妇女的性的权利,因而,不构成强奸罪,行为人只应该承担相应的民事责任或道德责任,而不应承担刑事责任。以此为前提,认为婚内强迫性行为非罪符合公正性、宽容性、经济性等现代刑法精神。

As a kind of law phenomenon coexisting with class society, Capital punishment has always been an important component of penalty system .But in the past two centuries, the debate on the existence or abolish of the Capital punishment has been outspread in the academy of criminal law. The significance of the debate has exceeds the pattern of penalty itself. The consequence of the debate will inevitably influence the criminal law legislation and judicature .We should remain Capital punishment, but its scope of application...

As a kind of law phenomenon coexisting with class society, Capital punishment has always been an important component of penalty system .But in the past two centuries, the debate on the existence or abolish of the Capital punishment has been outspread in the academy of criminal law. The significance of the debate has exceeds the pattern of penalty itself. The consequence of the debate will inevitably influence the criminal law legislation and judicature .We should remain Capital punishment, but its scope of application should be confined.

死刑作为一种与阶级社会相伴生的法律现象,数千年来一直是刑罚体系的重要组成部分。但近两个世纪,死刑存废的论争在全世界刑法学界展开。这一论争的意义已超出了死刑这一刑罚方式本身,其结果势必影响到刑事立法和司法。我国对死刑应予保留,但其适用应予严格限制。

Being a sociological and legal phenomenon that prominently imperils society, complicity has always been a major topic of discussion in legislative, judiciary and academic circles all over the world. With respect to the constitution of the crime and the sanctions of accomplices, concerned legislations and doctrines vary a great deal in different countries. Based on the community-imperiling nature of the crime, China’s complicity laws intend to solve the problem of who should be deemed an accomplice when more...

Being a sociological and legal phenomenon that prominently imperils society, complicity has always been a major topic of discussion in legislative, judiciary and academic circles all over the world. With respect to the constitution of the crime and the sanctions of accomplices, concerned legislations and doctrines vary a great deal in different countries. Based on the community-imperiling nature of the crime, China’s complicity laws intend to solve the problem of who should be deemed an accomplice when more than one person participate in a crime and how to determine their legal accountability since their conducts vary in the crime. In comparison, Japan’s complicity laws focus on the “constructive requirements” and attach much importance to the difference between the principle and the accomplice. The key problem is to set out the requirements of the complicity appropriately. The difference between the two systems reveals different values in the criminal laws of the two countries. China’s institution is inclined to protect values of the society, while Japan is inclined to safeguard individual human rights.

共同犯罪作为一种对社会危害显著的社会法律现象,历来都是各国立法、司法和理论界关注的重心之一。对于如何界定共同犯罪的成立条件,如何处罚共同犯罪中的参与者,各国立法和理论各不相同。基于社会危害性这一犯罪观,我国共犯制度的设定目的是要解决多人共同实行某种刑法所规定的犯罪行为时,将哪些参与者作为犯罪人,在犯罪中所起作用不同的行为人,如何使其承担与其地位与作用相当的刑事责任问题;日本共犯制度设定则以“构成要件”为中心,重视共犯与正犯的区别,如何解决共犯者的犯罪成立条件是其核心课题。这种不同取决于两国刑法所选择的价值取向上的不同,我国的共犯制度倾向于保护价值,而日本倾向于保障人权。

 
<< 更多相关文摘    
图标索引 相关查询

 


 
CNKI小工具
在英文学术搜索中查有关法律现象的内容
在知识搜索中查有关法律现象的内容
在数字搜索中查有关法律现象的内容
在概念知识元中查有关法律现象的内容
在学术趋势中查有关法律现象的内容
 
 

CNKI主页设CNKI翻译助手为主页 | 收藏CNKI翻译助手 | 广告服务 | 英文学术搜索
版权图标  2008 CNKI-中国知网
京ICP证040431号 互联网出版许可证 新出网证(京)字008号
北京市公安局海淀分局 备案号:110 1081725
版权图标 2008中国知网(cnki) 中国学术期刊(光盘版)电子杂志社