(2) In some model rats, the frequency of colonic slow wave decreased (5.55±1.20 /min vs control group 13.20±1.09/min, p﹤0.01)and amplitude increased (0.43±0.05 mv vs control group 0.19±0.02 mv, p﹤0.01)compared with the normal rats, and its’ slow wave form was irregular.
(2)模型组大鼠结肠慢波出现双向改变,部分大鼠结肠慢波频率明显减慢(5.55±1.20次/min vs 对照组13.20±1.09次/min,p﹤0.01),振幅增加(0.43±0.05 mv vs 对照组0.19±0.02 mv,p﹤0.01),波形仍表现为不规则的近似正弦波样曲线;
In the other model rats, the frequency ofcolonic slow wave increased(30.85±3.86 /min vs control group 13.20±1.09 /min, p﹤0.01) and amplitude was variable (0.21±0.03 mv vs control group 0.19±0.02 mv, p﹤0.01), and its slow wave form was also irregular.
The BWO(Backward-Wave Oscillator) slow-wave structure was optimized by the KARAT code,and the experiment was performed at the RADAD303 accelerator flat under the condition of the electron beam with the voltage of 177kV,the current of 785A,and magnetic field of 1.TT. TE_(11) mode millimeter wave was generated,whose peak powe is 18MW,frequency 39.8GHz and pulse duration 3ns.
Gastric pacing could normalize gastric dysrhythmia induced by GR113808,and percentage of normal slow wave was ameliorated(93.9%±1.9%),and energy of pacing stimuli needed to entrain gastric slow waves was markedly decreased than that of the controls(P<0.01).
The computer simulation from cold cavity to hot cavity of Hughes coupled cavity slowwave structure is depicted used by MAFIA. Cold cavity simulation result is compared with theoretical and experimental ones. The average error of dispersion is 0.02% and the average error of interaction impedance is 5%.
The possibility of breaking of a slow wave in a rarefaction section was noted by Akhiezer et al.
Conditions under which a slow wave breaks in a rarefaction section are found.
In this paper the fast Frenkel-Biot wave is not investigated while the slow wave is approximated by the piezoconductivity equation.
Analysis of variance demonstrated the influence of the emotional stimuli sign on the factorsP100,P140,N160,P220,P340, and "slow wave." Hemispheric difference in reactions to the stimuli of a different emotional sign were recorded.
During presentation of the positive and negative assessments, the amplitudes of the factorsP100,P340, and "slow wave" were maximally different in the left hemisphere, while the factorsN160 andP220 were maximally different in the right hemisphere.