助手标题  
全文文献 工具书 数字 学术定义 翻译助手 学术趋势 更多
查询帮助
意见反馈
   重症社区获得性肺炎 的翻译结果: 查询用时:0.318秒
图标索引 在分类学科中查询
所有学科
呼吸系统疾病
临床医学
更多类别查询

图标索引 历史查询
 

重症社区获得性肺炎
相关语句
  serious community acquired pneumonia
     Objective: To investigate the pathogen and antibiotic sensitivity of serious community acquired pneumonia (SCAP) in our hospital and to evaluate the clinical characteristics of SCAP, aiming at providing evidence for using antibiotic.
     目的 :探讨本地区重症社区获得性肺炎 (SCAP)的病原学与药敏特点 ,为合理使用抗生素提供依据。
短句来源
  serious community-acquired pneumonia
     Evaluation of glucocorticoid in treatment for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome as a result of serious community-acquired pneumonia
     糖皮质激素在重症社区获得性肺炎致急性呼吸窘迫综合征综合救治中的价值探讨
短句来源
     Objective: To evaluate the usage of glucocorticoid(GC) in treatment for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) resulting from serious community-acquired pneumonia (SCAP).
     目的 :探讨糖皮质激素 (GC)在重症社区获得性肺炎 (SCAP)致急性呼吸窘迫综合征 (ARDS)综合救治中的价值。
短句来源
  severity community acquired pneumonia
     Combining azithromycin with ceftriaxone sodium for treating severity community acquired pneumonia
     阿奇霉素联合头孢曲松钠治疗重症社区获得性肺炎
短句来源
     Conclusion There is a better efficacy of combining azithromycin with ceftriaxone sodium for treating severity community acquired pneumonia than azithromycin or ceftriaxone sodium used individually.
     结论阿奇霉素联合头孢曲松钠治疗重症社区获得性肺炎优于上述单种抗生素。
短句来源
  “重症社区获得性肺炎”译为未确定词的双语例句
     Anaysis of Pathogen and Antibiotic Sensitivity of 52 Cases with Severe Community Acquired Pneumonia
     52例重症社区获得性肺炎病原体及药物敏感性分析
短句来源
     Clinical Efficacy of Azithromycin and Ceftazidime in Treating Com-munity Acquired Pneumonia
     阿奇霉素联合头孢他啶治疗重症社区获得性肺炎
短句来源
     Effectiveness of β lactam antibiotics compared with antibiotics active againstatypical pathogens in non-severe community acquired pneumonia: meta-analysis
     β内酰胺类抗生素与对非典型病原体有效的抗生素在非重症社区获得性肺炎中的疗效比较:汇总分析
短句来源
     Objective To study the effects of noninvasive bi-level positive airway pressure(BiPAP) ventilation in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema(CPE) and severe community-acquired pneumonia(CAP) with acute respiratory failure.
     目的 研究无创双水平正压通气 (BiPAP)对心源性肺水肿和重症社区获得性肺炎所致呼吸衰竭的治疗效果。
短句来源
     Objective To study the effects of noninvasive bi-level positive airway pressure (BiPAP) ventilation on acute respiratory failure (ARF) resulted from acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema (CPE) and severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).
     目的研究无创双水平气道正压通气(BiPAP)对心源性肺水肿和重症社区获得性肺炎所致的急性呼吸衰竭(ARF)的治疗效果,评估BiPAP在ARF治疗中的作用。
短句来源
更多       

 

查询“重症社区获得性肺炎”译词为其他词的双语例句

     

    查询“重症社区获得性肺炎”译词为用户自定义的双语例句

        我想查看译文中含有:的双语例句
    例句
    没有找到相关例句


    Objective To study the effects of noninvasive bi-level positive airway pressure(BiPAP) ventilation in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema(CPE) and severe community-acquired pneumonia(CAP) with acute respiratory failure. Methods Forty-nine patients with acute respiratory failure were divided into CPE group(25 patients) and CAP group(24 patients). The effects of the treatment were investigated. Results During the early phase of BiPAP treatment, the oxygenation improved significantly in both CPE and CAP groups....

    Objective To study the effects of noninvasive bi-level positive airway pressure(BiPAP) ventilation in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema(CPE) and severe community-acquired pneumonia(CAP) with acute respiratory failure. Methods Forty-nine patients with acute respiratory failure were divided into CPE group(25 patients) and CAP group(24 patients). The effects of the treatment were investigated. Results During the early phase of BiPAP treatment, the oxygenation improved significantly in both CPE and CAP groups. The CPE patients had a significantly shorter duration of BiPAP treatment than CAP patients. 8% patients in the CPE group and 37.5% patients in the CAP group required intubation ( P <0.01). The mortality rate was 4% in the CPE group and 29.2% in the CAP group ( P <0.01). Conclusion BiPAP could rapidly improve oxygenation in acute CPE and severe CAP with acute respiratory failure, however the subsequent outcome was different in two groups. [

    目的 研究无创双水平正压通气 (BiPAP)对心源性肺水肿和重症社区获得性肺炎所致呼吸衰竭的治疗效果。方法  4 9例急性呼吸衰竭患者分为心源性肺水肿组 (2 5例 )和重症肺炎组 (2 4例 ) ,均应用BiPAP进行治疗 ,观察两组的治疗效果。结果 两组患者应用BiPAP治疗后早期氧合均得到明显改善 ;心源性肺水肿组在BiPAP治疗时间、气管插管率、死亡率方面均明显低于重症肺炎组。结论 无创正压通气在早期可以纠正心源性肺水肿和重症肺炎合并呼吸衰竭患者的氧合 ,但最终的预后因呼吸衰竭的病理类型不同而有很大区别。

    Objective: To evaluate the usage of glucocorticoid(GC) in treatment for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) resulting from serious community-acquired pneumonia (SCAP). Methods: The clinical data from all patients with ARDS resulting from SCAP in medical ICU (MICU) from May 2000 to Feb. 2003 were collected. Their age, sex, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHEⅡ) score, PaO 2/FiO 2 and Qs/Qt, the severity of SCAP, mechanical ventilation (MV) and the level of positive...

    Objective: To evaluate the usage of glucocorticoid(GC) in treatment for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) resulting from serious community-acquired pneumonia (SCAP). Methods: The clinical data from all patients with ARDS resulting from SCAP in medical ICU (MICU) from May 2000 to Feb. 2003 were collected. Their age, sex, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHEⅡ) score, PaO 2/FiO 2 and Qs/Qt, the severity of SCAP, mechanical ventilation (MV) and the level of positive end-expiratory pressure(PEEP), time of stay in ICU, improvement of SCAP and oxygenation, as well as mortality and reasons of death were analyzed, respectively. So was did the influence of administration of GC on hypoxemia, septic shock, and their prognosis. Results: There were 24 cases totally, among them 7 patients had not taken GC, and 5 patients were cured (71.4 percent), and the other 2 cases died ( 28.6 percent). Their direct cause of death were multiple organ dysfunction syndrome(MODS) and ARDS, respectively. In 17 cases GC was given because hypoxemia and septic shock could not be alleviated with ordinary therapy, including MV.Among them only 5 patients (29.4 percent) were cured, and all others ( 12 cases, 70.6 percent) died, and the major direct cause of death was MODS(6 cases,75.0 percent). A few of them died of ARDS and septic shock(1 case,12.5 percent, respectively). The severity of SCAP, as well as other clinical data of the survivors, showed no significant difference compared with the nonsurvivors (P>0.05). But except for their PaO 2/FiO 2, Qs/Qt and shock, their pulmonary infection was better controlled than deaths (P<0.001). Conclusion: Refractory hypoxemia and septic shock of patients with pulmonary ARDS might be alleviated by GC when they are treated with routine methods, including MV, thus it enabled to win the time for other effective treatments.

    目的 :探讨糖皮质激素 (GC)在重症社区获得性肺炎 (SCAP)致急性呼吸窘迫综合征 (ARDS)综合救治中的价值。方法 :收集 2 0 0 0年 5月— 2 0 0 3年 2月所有因 SCAP致 ARDS入住 ICU患者的临床资料 ,分析年龄、性别、急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分 (APACHE )、氧合指数 (Pa O2 /Fi O2 )、肺内分流 (Qs/Qt)、肺部感染严重程度、机械通气、呼气末正压 (PEEP)水平、ICU停留时间、肺炎吸收指数、氧合改善率、病死率及直接死亡原因等 ,评价应用 GC对缺氧与休克纠正和预后的影响。结果 :2 4例患者中 ,未接受 GC治疗 7例 ,痊愈 5例(71.4 % ) ,死亡 2例 (2 8.6 % ) ,直接死亡原因分别为 ARDS(拒绝接受机械通气治疗 )和多脏器功能障碍综合征(MODS) ;接受 GC治疗 17例 ,仅痊愈 5例 (2 9.4 % ) ,死亡 12例 (70 .6 % ) ,主要死亡原因为 MODS(6例 ,75 .0 % ) ,少数为 ARDS与休克 (各 1例 ,12 .5 % )。痊愈患者肺部感染严重程度等临床参数与死亡...

    目的 :探讨糖皮质激素 (GC)在重症社区获得性肺炎 (SCAP)致急性呼吸窘迫综合征 (ARDS)综合救治中的价值。方法 :收集 2 0 0 0年 5月— 2 0 0 3年 2月所有因 SCAP致 ARDS入住 ICU患者的临床资料 ,分析年龄、性别、急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分 (APACHE )、氧合指数 (Pa O2 /Fi O2 )、肺内分流 (Qs/Qt)、肺部感染严重程度、机械通气、呼气末正压 (PEEP)水平、ICU停留时间、肺炎吸收指数、氧合改善率、病死率及直接死亡原因等 ,评价应用 GC对缺氧与休克纠正和预后的影响。结果 :2 4例患者中 ,未接受 GC治疗 7例 ,痊愈 5例(71.4 % ) ,死亡 2例 (2 8.6 % ) ,直接死亡原因分别为 ARDS(拒绝接受机械通气治疗 )和多脏器功能障碍综合征(MODS) ;接受 GC治疗 17例 ,仅痊愈 5例 (2 9.4 % ) ,死亡 12例 (70 .6 % ) ,主要死亡原因为 MODS(6例 ,75 .0 % ) ,少数为 ARDS与休克 (各 1例 ,12 .5 % )。痊愈患者肺部感染严重程度等临床参数与死亡者无显著差异(P>0 .0 5 ) ,但治疗后除 Pa O2 /Fi O2 和 Qs/Qt改善、休克纠正明显外 ,肺部感染有效率高 (P<0 .0 0 1)。结论 :GC能协助机械通气等常规治疗纠正 SCAP等肺内性 ARDS的顽固性缺氧和休克 ,为原发病治疗赢得时间。

    Objective The study was designed to investigate the clinicial efficacy of azithromycin and ceftazidime in treating the patients with community acquired pneumonia. Methods 112 cases were randomly assigned into 3 groups. 32 patients of Group A received azithromycin 500mg/d, and 41 patients of Group B ceftazidime 4~6g/d, and 39 patients of Group C azithromycin 500mg/d and ceftazidime 4~6g/d simultaneously. Results There was a better efficacy in Group C than the other two (P<0.05). Conculsion There was a...

    Objective The study was designed to investigate the clinicial efficacy of azithromycin and ceftazidime in treating the patients with community acquired pneumonia. Methods 112 cases were randomly assigned into 3 groups. 32 patients of Group A received azithromycin 500mg/d, and 41 patients of Group B ceftazidime 4~6g/d, and 39 patients of Group C azithromycin 500mg/d and ceftazidime 4~6g/d simultaneously. Results There was a better efficacy in Group C than the other two (P<0.05). Conculsion There was a better efficacy of azithromycin and ceftazidime simultaneously than azithromycin or ceftazidime individually in treating the patients with community acquired pneumonia.

    目的 观察阿奇霉素联合头孢他啶治疗重症社区获得性肺炎的临床疗效。方法 将 112例患者随机分为 3组 :A组 32例 ,阿奇霉素针 5 0 0mg/d ;B组 4 1例 ,头孢他啶针 4~ 6 g/d ;C组 39例 ,阿奇霉素针5 0 0mg/d和头孢他啶针 4 - 6 g/d。观察临床有效率 ,并对结果进行统计学分析。 结果 C组有效率明显高于对照组A、B。结论 阿奇霉素联合头孢他啶治疗重症社区获得性肺炎优于上述单种抗生素。

     
    << 更多相关文摘    
    图标索引 相关查询

     


     
    CNKI小工具
    在英文学术搜索中查有关重症社区获得性肺炎的内容
    在知识搜索中查有关重症社区获得性肺炎的内容
    在数字搜索中查有关重症社区获得性肺炎的内容
    在概念知识元中查有关重症社区获得性肺炎的内容
    在学术趋势中查有关重症社区获得性肺炎的内容
     
     

    CNKI主页设CNKI翻译助手为主页 | 收藏CNKI翻译助手 | 广告服务 | 英文学术搜索
    版权图标  2008 CNKI-中国知网
    京ICP证040431号 互联网出版许可证 新出网证(京)字008号
    北京市公安局海淀分局 备案号:110 1081725
    版权图标 2008中国知网(cnki) 中国学术期刊(光盘版)电子杂志社