助手标题  
全文文献 工具书 数字 学术定义 翻译助手 学术趋势 更多
查询帮助
意见反馈
   人文社会科学 在 哲学 分类中 的翻译结果: 查询用时:1.143秒
图标索引 在分类学科中查询
所有学科
哲学
高等教育
社会科学理论与方法
图书情报与数字图书馆
出版
科学研究管理
教育理论与教育管理
医学教育与医学边缘学科
社会学及统计学
更多类别查询

图标索引 历史查询
 

人文社会科学
相关语句
  humanities and social sciences
    On the Trend of Convergence between the Development of Modern Western Philosophy and the Disciplines of Humanities and Social Sciences
    论现代西方哲学发展与人文社会科学结盟的趋势
短句来源
    Moreover, the author probes preliminarily such problems as the importance and the function that the understanding and the explanation have methodologically in the natural science, humanities and social sciences, the unification and its mechanism of understanding and explanation, and the like.
    并就说明与理解在自然科学和人文社会科学中的方法论地位、作用 ,二者的统一及其机制等问题作了初步探讨。
短句来源
    The theory of Marxism is a science on life in essence. It has a normal form differing from that of natural science and that of humanities and social sciences.
    马克思主义理论本质上是一门生活科学,它与自然科学和人文社会科学有着不同的范式。
短句来源
    The present work defines "truth as the theory of irrefutable and reliable reality; aud thus explores the distinction between the outlook on truth in the theories of natural science and the theories of humanities and social sciences and the outlook on truth in the speculation; and on this basis, puts forward Marxist outlook on truth of life science.
    本文把“真理”界定为确凿可靠的真实理论,由此着重探讨自然科学理论和人文社会科学理论中的真理观与思辨的真理观的区别,并在此基础上提出了马克思主义生活科学的真理观。
短句来源
  social sciences and humanities
    On the basis of gathering many works and articles by R. GCollingwood , the author reorganized the logic thinking and content of his theory of re-enactment and analyzed deeply the influence on the analytic philosophy of history, and criticized it by the development of the modern social sciences and Humanities and the view of Marxism.
    本文根据搜集柯林武德所写的著作和论文,重新整理他的重演理论的逻辑思路和内容,深刻剖析其对分析历史哲学的影响,并依据现代人文社会科学的发展和马克思主义的观点对其批判和借鉴。
短句来源
  “人文社会科学”译为未确定词的双语例句
    The main substances of cognitive anthropology are the followings: the theory of cognitive interests; the theory of communicative community and the theory of the types of Geisteswissenschaften.
    认知人类学最主要的内容是认知旨趣理论、交往共同体理论和关于人文社会科学的不同类型的理论。
短句来源
    The target of the cognitive anthropology is to provide a solid basis for human science especially for the Geisteswissenschaften.
    他的认知人类学旨在为人类科学尤其是人文社会科学提供坚实的基础。
短句来源
    Based on these two preconditions, Apel classifies the Geisteswissenschaften into three types : "quasi-nomological behavioral science", hermeneutics and critical social science.
    以这两个条件为基础,阿佩尔把人文社会科学分为三种类型:“准因果法则的行为科学”、解释学和批判的社会科学。
短句来源
    He establishes a foundation for Geisteswissenschaften with cognitive anthropology.
    阿佩尔通过认知人类学为人文社会科学的地位奠定了基础。
短句来源
    The nurture of philosophical academic style is of significance in methodology in studying other subjects of humanities.
    哲学学术风格的训练对其他一切人文社会科学的学习具有方法论意义。
短句来源
查询“人文社会科学”译词为用户自定义的双语例句

    我想查看译文中含有:的双语例句
例句
为了更好的帮助您理解掌握查询词或其译词在地道英语中的实际用法,我们为您准备了出自英文原文的大量英语例句,供您参考。
  humanities and social sciences
This acceptance also showed the "crisis of paradigm", that is, the contradiction between the new themes and the old ones that had dominated Chinese humanities and social sciences.
      
The job search success of recent doctoral recipients in the humanities and social sciences who submitted dissertations on queer topics was compared to the job search success of a control group.
      
The framing of breast-feeding as a project contrasts with the emphases on pleasure, embodied subjectivity, relationality, and empowerment that characterizes much of the recent breast-feeding literature across the humanities and social sciences.
      
Despite being the Forum largely interdisciplinary, important aspects of knowledge were not explicitly considered, namely, humanities and social sciences, as well as indigenous knowledge.
      
Knowledge representation and reasoning in the humanities and social sciences: A conference report
      
更多          
  social sciences and humanities
These results, from a survey and interviews of teachers and researchers in the social sciences and humanities, are analyzed in the context of dependency theory within knowledge economies.
      
The social sciences and humanities have the potential for coping with the current paradoxes.
      
This text is essentially based on works carried out for a research which was subsidized from 1997 to 2000 by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC).
      
Allocation and evaluation: The approach at the social sciences and humanities research council of Canada
      
The Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC) is the principal source of funds for university-based research and scholarship in the social sciences and the humanities in Canada.
      
更多          


Through a historic study of the meaning of ontology which is one of the most important branches of Western philosophy, the present p aper focuses on the analysis of the basic difference between Chinese learning an d Western lear ning, namely, the difference between “to be” and “ought to be” at the starti ng point of thinking. The author argues that this difference not only has caused almost all the important differences between Chinese learning and Western learn ing, but also implies that Chinese learning...

Through a historic study of the meaning of ontology which is one of the most important branches of Western philosophy, the present p aper focuses on the analysis of the basic difference between Chinese learning an d Western lear ning, namely, the difference between “to be” and “ought to be” at the starti ng point of thinking. The author argues that this difference not only has caused almost all the important differences between Chinese learning and Western learn ing, but also implies that Chinese learning and Western learning are essentially two different types of learning. Thus the systematics of Chinese learning and t hat of Western learning are both reasonable in themselves and it seems a big mis take to split apart ancient Chinese learning and re organize it according to the syste matics of Western learning.

本文试图通过对Ontology这个古希腊以来西方哲学中的核心范畴的历史考证来揭示西学与中学在出发点上所存在的一个基本差异,即“是”与“应该”的差异,及其在中西学术和思想比较中的重要意义。一方面,“是”与“应该”的差异,构成了西学与中学几乎一切重大差异的根源;另一方面,这一思维方式在出发点上的差异也标志着中学和西方人文、社会科学学科在多数情况下属于两种不同类型的学问,二者之间在很多领域都不具有可比性。我们既不能以中学的标准来衡量西学,也不能以西学的标准来要求中学。无论是中学过去的分类体系,还是西学现在的分类体系都是在它们自身内在的思维理路的支配下逐步形成的,因而也都有着各自的合理性。

In the early period of Habermaes's research (1950 - 1960), he followed the tradition of Frankfurt School and attempted to make a base for the critical theory on society in the sense of epistemology and methodology. After 1970, he gradually transcended Frankfurt School, took in the soul of many schools and finally completed the diversion of epistemology to theory of communication in the 1980s. The Theory of communicative action nearly deals with all circles of humanities and social sciences, and this theory...

In the early period of Habermaes's research (1950 - 1960), he followed the tradition of Frankfurt School and attempted to make a base for the critical theory on society in the sense of epistemology and methodology. After 1970, he gradually transcended Frankfurt School, took in the soul of many schools and finally completed the diversion of epistemology to theory of communication in the 1980s. The Theory of communicative action nearly deals with all circles of humanities and social sciences, and this theory has been developing with Habermas's research.

哈贝马斯在理论活动的初期(20世纪50-60年代),秉承法兰克福学派的传统,致力于从认识论和方法论角度为社会批判理论奠定基础。70年代后,他逐渐突破了该学派的限制,汲取各派思想精华,并最终于80年代初完成了从认识论向交往理论的转向。“交往行为理论”是一部几乎涉及人文社会科学所有领域的百科全书。这一理论随着哈贝马斯的研究仍在不断拓展中。

Since Dilthy Proposed that “whereas nature is subject to explanation, history is amenable to understanding”, there have been the debates about the understanding and explanation and the relation between them. In this paper, the author argues that, “The explanation of nature phenomenon is in need of understanding, and the understanding of human social phenomenon is in need of explanation”. Moreover, the author probes preliminarily such problems as the importance and the function that the understanding and the...

Since Dilthy Proposed that “whereas nature is subject to explanation, history is amenable to understanding”, there have been the debates about the understanding and explanation and the relation between them. In this paper, the author argues that, “The explanation of nature phenomenon is in need of understanding, and the understanding of human social phenomenon is in need of explanation”. Moreover, the author probes preliminarily such problems as the importance and the function that the understanding and the explanation have methodologically in the natural science, humanities and social sciences, the unification and its mechanism of understanding and explanation, and the like.

自狄尔泰提出“自然需要说明 ,历史需要理解”之后 ,关于说明与理解及其相互关系的争论一直延续至今。本文提出 :“自然现象的说明需要理解 ,人文社会现象的理解也需要说明”。并就说明与理解在自然科学和人文社会科学中的方法论地位、作用 ,二者的统一及其机制等问题作了初步探讨。

 
<< 更多相关文摘    
图标索引 相关查询

 


 
CNKI小工具
在英文学术搜索中查有关人文社会科学的内容
在知识搜索中查有关人文社会科学的内容
在数字搜索中查有关人文社会科学的内容
在概念知识元中查有关人文社会科学的内容
在学术趋势中查有关人文社会科学的内容
 
 

CNKI主页设CNKI翻译助手为主页 | 收藏CNKI翻译助手 | 广告服务 | 英文学术搜索
版权图标  2008 CNKI-中国知网
京ICP证040431号 互联网出版许可证 新出网证(京)字008号
北京市公安局海淀分局 备案号:110 1081725
版权图标 2008中国知网(cnki) 中国学术期刊(光盘版)电子杂志社