助手标题  
全文文献 工具书 数字 学术定义 翻译助手 学术趋势 更多
查询帮助
意见反馈
   中西逻辑 的翻译结果: 查询用时:0.216秒
图标索引 在分类学科中查询
所有学科
逻辑学
更多类别查询

图标索引 历史查询
 

中西逻辑
相关语句
  chinese and western logic
     Reflections on the Problems of the Premise in the Contrastive Research of Chinese and Western Logic
     反思中西逻辑比较研究的前提性问题
短句来源
     Therefore, it is an important subject in the studies of the Chinese and western logic history to compare the two theories.
     比较墨家与亚氏的谬误论 ,认识其同异和发生发展规律 ,是中西逻辑史研究的一个重要课题。
短句来源
     Therefore, the reflections on the problems of the premise in the contrastive research of Chinese and Western logic can provide the experience for reference in correctly discussing the objects and individuality of both studies, in reasonably appraising the advantages and disadvantages of them and the value for human beings, and in constructing the Chinese new culture.
     因此 ,只有认真反思中西逻辑比较研究的“前提性”问题 ,才能正确探讨各自的研究对象与个性 ,全理评价各自的长短及其人类性价值 ,为中国新文化建设提供重要借鉴
短句来源
  “中西逻辑”译为未确定词的双语例句
     Our study must take into considerat ion of the influence exerted by culture on logic.
     中西逻辑比较研究启示我们:要注重逻辑与文化关系的研究,既要研究文化对逻辑的制约,又要研究逻辑对文化的影响。
短句来源
     An Investigation and Analysis of the Causative Factors for the Developmental Differences between the Chinese and Western Logics
     中西逻辑发展差异的成因探析
短句来源
     On the Causes for the Unbalanced Logics Development in the West and China
     中西逻辑不平衡发展的原因探析
短句来源
     There are two most significant events in the study of Chinese logic during the 20th century.
     20世纪的中国逻辑史研究,有两个最有意义的事件,一是世纪初开展的中西逻辑比较。
短句来源
     Chinese and English are different in leading inferential modes, so translators should reorganize the logical sequence according to the phenomenon that Chinese focuses on "induction" and English "deduction".
     由于中西逻辑主导推理模式的不同,翻译时应采取重组逻辑顺序的方法,遵循中文“归纳”英文“演绎”的模式。
短句来源
更多       
  相似匹配句对
     the logical characteristics of proof of China and Western are revealed;
     揭示了中西证明标准的逻辑特点;
短句来源
     An Investigation and Analysis of the Causative Factors for the Developmental Differences between the Chinese and Western Logics
     中西逻辑发展差异的成因探析
短句来源
     Logic of Information Currents
     信息流逻辑
短句来源
     Combinational Logic
     组合逻辑
短句来源
     Compare between Chinese Judicial Power and Western Countries' Judicial Power
     中西司法权的比较
短句来源
查询“中西逻辑”译词为用户自定义的双语例句

    我想查看译文中含有:的双语例句
例句
没有找到相关例句


Fallacy studies are an important component of logic. Mo-tse in the ancient China and Aristotle in the ancient Greece had their own fallacy studies respectively. The similarity is that they have both analyzed the errors in thinking forms and paid great attention to the analysis of logic errors in speech. The differences lie in their different ways of error analysis and different degrees of systematicity in theories. The logic of Mo-tse and that of Aristotle are two kinds of theories with the same nature but different...

Fallacy studies are an important component of logic. Mo-tse in the ancient China and Aristotle in the ancient Greece had their own fallacy studies respectively. The similarity is that they have both analyzed the errors in thinking forms and paid great attention to the analysis of logic errors in speech. The differences lie in their different ways of error analysis and different degrees of systematicity in theories. The logic of Mo-tse and that of Aristotle are two kinds of theories with the same nature but different forms. Their theories of fallacy are the same in nature because man has the same rule of thinking, and they are different in content and form because they were formed in different conditions in China and in the west, such as different forms of argument, different logic systems and language styles. They have their own characteristics, but both of them played an important role then in disproving sophistry and understanding the truth. Therefore, it is an important subject in the studies of the Chinese and western logic history to compare the two theories.

谬误论是逻辑学的重要内容。中国古代的墨家和古希腊的亚里士多德 ,分别对谬误论进行了各具特色的研究。其相同点是墨家和亚氏都分析了思维形式方面的谬误、都重视对语言和违反矛盾律所犯逻辑谬误的分析。其不同点是墨家和亚氏对谬误分析的表现形式不同 ,以及其谬误理论的系统化程度不同。墨家逻辑和亚氏逻辑是本质相同而形态不同的两种谬误理论。由于人类思维规律在本质上是一致的 ,因而 ,它们所形成谬误论的本质也是相同的。但又由于它们的谬误论形成的具体条件不同 ,如当时中西方论辩形式不同、逻辑体系不同、语言风格不同 ,谬误论的内容和形式也就不同。它们各具特色 ,在当时都对反驳诡辩、认识真理起了巨大的作用。比较墨家与亚氏的谬误论 ,认识其同异和发生发展规律 ,是中西逻辑史研究的一个重要课题。

Western learning into the east brings about the mergence of w estern and eastern culture and in turn brings about the comparative study of wes tern and eastern logics.The study has two tendenes:seking similarity and making differences.The former believe that the two is basically the same.The latter bel ieve that argumentology of China in ancient time is different from traditional we stern find is different from traditional western logic .We believe that both sim i larity and differenc exist in the two logics.Our...

Western learning into the east brings about the mergence of w estern and eastern culture and in turn brings about the comparative study of wes tern and eastern logics.The study has two tendenes:seking similarity and making differences.The former believe that the two is basically the same.The latter bel ieve that argumentology of China in ancient time is different from traditional we stern find is different from traditional western logic .We believe that both sim i larity and differenc exist in the two logics.Our study must take into considerat ion of the influence exerted by culture on logic.

在西学东渐所引发的中西文化交汇大潮中,出现了中西逻辑比较研究。中西逻辑比较研究有两种取向:求同与取异。求同视中西逻辑二者基本为一;取异有两个方面含义,其一,中国古代的名学与辩学不等同于西方传统逻辑,其二,名学与辩学中所含逻辑思想或学说,也不等同于西方传统逻辑。我们认为,中西逻辑比较研究在关注两者共同性的同时,更要分析和认识两者的差异性。中西逻辑比较研究启示我们:要注重逻辑与文化关系的研究,既要研究文化对逻辑的制约,又要研究逻辑对文化的影响。

In this article,the author analyzes the background of Chinese and the Western logic's development,trying to show that Chinese logic is different from the Western logic.Then the author narrates some debates about the history of Chinese logic,and holds that the debates should be based on the specialty of Chinese logic,the two sides should not go to the extreme but learn from each other and promote the development of the research of the history of Chinese logic.

本文通过对中西逻辑各自发展背景的对比分析 ,说明中国逻辑有不同于西方逻辑的特殊性 ,评述中国逻辑史研究中的有关争论 ,主张争论要以中国逻辑是有特色的为基点 ,两种见解分别不要走向极端 ,要相互汲取对方的长处 ,共同促进中国逻辑史研究的发展

 
<< 更多相关文摘    
图标索引 相关查询

 


 
CNKI小工具
在英文学术搜索中查有关中西逻辑的内容
在知识搜索中查有关中西逻辑的内容
在数字搜索中查有关中西逻辑的内容
在概念知识元中查有关中西逻辑的内容
在学术趋势中查有关中西逻辑的内容
 
 

CNKI主页设CNKI翻译助手为主页 | 收藏CNKI翻译助手 | 广告服务 | 英文学术搜索
版权图标  2008 CNKI-中国知网
京ICP证040431号 互联网出版许可证 新出网证(京)字008号
北京市公安局海淀分局 备案号:110 1081725
版权图标 2008中国知网(cnki) 中国学术期刊(光盘版)电子杂志社