助手标题  
全文文献 工具书 数字 学术定义 翻译助手 学术趋势 更多
查询帮助
意见反馈
   新哲学思维 的翻译结果: 查询用时:0.191秒
图标索引 在分类学科中查询
所有学科
地质学
更多类别查询

图标索引 历史查询
 

新哲学思维
相关语句
  “新哲学思维”译为未确定词的双语例句
     With the robust development of the ecotourism and the springing up of the new philosophical thoughts of ecological val-ue,the study of ecotourism's value has gradually become an important task receiving close attention philosophical topic.
     随着生态旅游的蓬勃发展和生态价值新哲学思维的兴起,生态旅游价值研究日益成为多学科关注的一个重大课题。
短句来源
  相似匹配句对
     Exploration of a New Mode of Philosophical Thinking
     探索哲学思维模式
短句来源
     A New Scientific and Philosophic Study of the Culture Theory of Man and Nature
     “天人合一”思想的科学哲学思维
短句来源
     New Method to Organize Information Resources on Network
     搜索引擎思维
短句来源
     The Practical Mode of Thinking of Marxist New Philosophy
     论马克思哲学的实践思维方式
短句来源
     Pratical mode of thinking is the root feature of Marx's New Philosophy.
     实践思维方式是马克思哲学的根本特征。
短句来源
查询“新哲学思维”译词为用户自定义的双语例句

    我想查看译文中含有:的双语例句
例句
没有找到相关例句


Modern historical geography has originated gradually from historical science since the end oflast century,and developed as a solitary branch of branch of modern geography up to 1930’s.On the development of modern historical geography in the west from 1920’s to 1990’s,there are four periods:(1) of discussing the discipline defimtion from 1920’s to 1950’s,which reflects the formal setting upof modern historical geography;(2)of inquiring the methodology from 1960’s to 1970’s,whichpromotes the concrete study on...

Modern historical geography has originated gradually from historical science since the end oflast century,and developed as a solitary branch of branch of modern geography up to 1930’s.On the development of modern historical geography in the west from 1920’s to 1990’s,there are four periods:(1) of discussing the discipline defimtion from 1920’s to 1950’s,which reflects the formal setting upof modern historical geography;(2)of inquiring the methodology from 1960’s to 1970’s,whichpromotes the concrete study on the historical geography;(3) of new philosophical minds from theends of 1970’s to 1980’s,which propels the synthetical research of historical geography as a whole;and (4)of the tendency of plural study since 1990,which marks the new reached peak of modernhistorical geography.Scanning the growing course of modern historical geography in the west,there are three impetuses:discovering the new data,choosing the best approach,and renewing thethoughts on the development of historical geography, neverthe less,the sum of concrete researchesis the origin for the permanent development of modern historical geography in the west.

现代历史地理学,作为现代地理学中的一个独立分支学科,是自十九世纪末才逐渐从西方历史学科中脱胎出来,至本世纪20、30年代发展成为一门现代学科,从20年代至90年代,西方现代历史地理学的发展经历了学科定义探讨时期、方法论探索时期、新哲学思维影响时期和90年代以来的多元化研究趋势。纵观西方现代历史地理学的发展历程,历史地理学科的发展有三方面的推动力:新研究资料的发现、最佳研究方法的选择、研究思维的更新,而大量的具体研究实践,则是西方现代历史地理学得以长足发展的本源。

In a time of globalization and rapid scientific and technological developments, man depends on new philosophical thinking to cope with global problems that threaten his existence and development. Cross cultural philosophical dialogues and exchanges are therefore intrinsically necessary and coming to the foreground of the international community of philosophy. However, the studies of Marxist philosophy, Western philosophy and Chinese philosophy have been isolated from each other in the long established academic,...

In a time of globalization and rapid scientific and technological developments, man depends on new philosophical thinking to cope with global problems that threaten his existence and development. Cross cultural philosophical dialogues and exchanges are therefore intrinsically necessary and coming to the foreground of the international community of philosophy. However, the studies of Marxist philosophy, Western philosophy and Chinese philosophy have been isolated from each other in the long established academic, pedagogic and evaluation structure, resulting in difficulties in integrating intellectual resources to cope with the current problems and providing theoretic support to China's development. It is even harder for them to change the world and guide people through their lives. To promote theoretic innovation and update the philosophical studies in contemporary China, a symposium was held in Guilin of Guangxi Autonomous Region jointly by Social Sciences in China Press, Guangxi Normal University, Institute of Political and Public Management of Suzhou University and Institute of Politics and Law of Capital Normal University during Sept. 25 and 29 of 2003, under the name of “Cultural Conflicts and Philosophical Dialogues in the Context of Globalization: A Forum on Chinese, Western and Marxist Philosophies." The contributors of the following 6 papers were all at the symposium. We hope that this will lead to a cross disciplinary dialogue and exchanges in the fields of philosophical study, and that perspectives will converge to give birth to a new contemporary Chinese philosophy that bears the characters of our time and our nation.

全球化和科学技术迅猛发展的时代潮流 ,呼唤人类创造和运用新的哲学思维 ,为合理解决威胁人类生存发展的众多全球性问题提供智慧。跨文化的哲学对话和交流是这一思想背景的内在逻辑要求 ,并已凸显为国际哲学研究的一个重要主题。然而 ,在中国哲学界内部 ,由于传统的哲学研究方式以及教学体制和学术评估体制的弊端 ,马克思主义哲学、西方哲学和中国哲学长期处于相互隔膜的状态 ,很难整合各自的思想资源来回应时代的问题 ,满足中国发展的实践需要 ,更遑论肩负起改变世界、指导生活的使命。为了改变这种状况 ,实现当代中国哲学的理论创新和思想提升 ,中国社会科学杂志社、广西师范大学、苏州大学政治与公共管理学院和首都师范大学政法学院于 2 0 0 3年 9月 2 5— 2 9日在广西桂林联合举办了“全球化语境中的文明冲突与哲学对话 :中哲、西哲、马哲专家论坛”。会后 ,我们组织中国社会科学杂志社赵剑英编审、复旦大学哲学系陈学明教授、中国人民大学哲学系韩东晖副教授、中国人民大学哲学系彭永捷副教授、华中科技大学哲学系张廷国副教授、首都师范大学东方文化研究所白奚研究员等六位与会代表撰写了下面这组文章 ,希望藉此推动跨学科的哲学对话和思想交流 ,...

全球化和科学技术迅猛发展的时代潮流 ,呼唤人类创造和运用新的哲学思维 ,为合理解决威胁人类生存发展的众多全球性问题提供智慧。跨文化的哲学对话和交流是这一思想背景的内在逻辑要求 ,并已凸显为国际哲学研究的一个重要主题。然而 ,在中国哲学界内部 ,由于传统的哲学研究方式以及教学体制和学术评估体制的弊端 ,马克思主义哲学、西方哲学和中国哲学长期处于相互隔膜的状态 ,很难整合各自的思想资源来回应时代的问题 ,满足中国发展的实践需要 ,更遑论肩负起改变世界、指导生活的使命。为了改变这种状况 ,实现当代中国哲学的理论创新和思想提升 ,中国社会科学杂志社、广西师范大学、苏州大学政治与公共管理学院和首都师范大学政法学院于 2 0 0 3年 9月 2 5— 2 9日在广西桂林联合举办了“全球化语境中的文明冲突与哲学对话 :中哲、西哲、马哲专家论坛”。会后 ,我们组织中国社会科学杂志社赵剑英编审、复旦大学哲学系陈学明教授、中国人民大学哲学系韩东晖副教授、中国人民大学哲学系彭永捷副教授、华中科技大学哲学系张廷国副教授、首都师范大学东方文化研究所白奚研究员等六位与会代表撰写了下面这组文章 ,希望藉此推动跨学科的哲学对话和思想交流 ,形成哲学研究的视域融合 ,催生一种富有时代品格和?

In a time of globalization and rapid scientific and technological developments, man depends on new philosophical thinking to cope with global problems that threaten his existence and development. Cross cultural philosophical dialogues and exchanges are therefore intrinsically necessary and coming to the foreground of the international community of philosophy. However, the studies of Marxist philosophy, Western philosophy and Chinese philosophy have been isolated from each other in the long established academic,...

In a time of globalization and rapid scientific and technological developments, man depends on new philosophical thinking to cope with global problems that threaten his existence and development. Cross cultural philosophical dialogues and exchanges are therefore intrinsically necessary and coming to the foreground of the international community of philosophy. However, the studies of Marxist philosophy, Western philosophy and Chinese philosophy have been isolated from each other in the long established academic, pedagogic and evaluation structure, resulting in difficulties in integrating intellectual resources to cope with the current problems and providing theoretic support to China's development. It is even harder for them to change the world and guide people through their lives. To promote theoretic innovation and update the philosophical studies in contemporary China, a symposium was held in Guilin of Guangxi Autonomous Region jointly by Social Sciences in China Press, Guangxi Normal University, Institute of Political and Public Management of Suzhou University and Institute of Politics and Law of Capital Normal University during Sept. 25 and 29 of 2003, under the name of “Cultural Conflicts and Philosophical Dialogues in the Context of Globalization: A Forum on Chinese, Western and Marxist Philosophies." The contributors of the following 6 papers were all at the symposium. We hope that this will lead to a cross disciplinary dialogue and exchanges in the fields of philosophical study, and that perspectives will converge to give birth to a new contemporary Chinese philosophy that bears the characters of our time and our nation.

全球化和科学技术迅猛发展的时代潮流 ,呼唤人类创造和运用新的哲学思维 ,为合理解决威胁人类生存发展的众多全球性问题提供智慧。跨文化的哲学对话和交流是这一思想背景的内在逻辑要求 ,并已凸显为国际哲学研究的一个重要主题。然而 ,在中国哲学界内部 ,由于传统的哲学研究方式以及教学体制和学术评估体制的弊端 ,马克思主义哲学、西方哲学和中国哲学长期处于相互隔膜的状态 ,很难整合各自的思想资源来回应时代的问题 ,满足中国发展的实践需要 ,更遑论肩负起改变世界、指导生活的使命。为了改变这种状况 ,实现当代中国哲学的理论创新和思想提升 ,中国社会科学杂志社、广西师范大学、苏州大学政治与公共管理学院和首都师范大学政法学院于 2 0 0 3年 9月 2 5— 2 9日在广西桂林联合举办了“全球化语境中的文明冲突与哲学对话 :中哲、西哲、马哲专家论坛”。会后 ,我们组织中国社会科学杂志社赵剑英编审、复旦大学哲学系陈学明教授、中国人民大学哲学系韩东晖副教授、中国人民大学哲学系彭永捷副教授、华中科技大学哲学系张廷国副教授、首都师范大学东方文化研究所白奚研究员等六位与会代表撰写了下面这组文章 ,希望藉此推动跨学科的哲学对话和思想交流 ,...

全球化和科学技术迅猛发展的时代潮流 ,呼唤人类创造和运用新的哲学思维 ,为合理解决威胁人类生存发展的众多全球性问题提供智慧。跨文化的哲学对话和交流是这一思想背景的内在逻辑要求 ,并已凸显为国际哲学研究的一个重要主题。然而 ,在中国哲学界内部 ,由于传统的哲学研究方式以及教学体制和学术评估体制的弊端 ,马克思主义哲学、西方哲学和中国哲学长期处于相互隔膜的状态 ,很难整合各自的思想资源来回应时代的问题 ,满足中国发展的实践需要 ,更遑论肩负起改变世界、指导生活的使命。为了改变这种状况 ,实现当代中国哲学的理论创新和思想提升 ,中国社会科学杂志社、广西师范大学、苏州大学政治与公共管理学院和首都师范大学政法学院于 2 0 0 3年 9月 2 5— 2 9日在广西桂林联合举办了“全球化语境中的文明冲突与哲学对话 :中哲、西哲、马哲专家论坛”。会后 ,我们组织中国社会科学杂志社赵剑英编审、复旦大学哲学系陈学明教授、中国人民大学哲学系韩东晖副教授、中国人民大学哲学系彭永捷副教授、华中科技大学哲学系张廷国副教授、首都师范大学东方文化研究所白奚研究员等六位与会代表撰写了下面这组文章 ,希望藉此推动跨学科的哲学对话和思想交流 ,形成哲学研究的视域融合 ,催生一种富有时代品格和?

 
<< 更多相关文摘    
图标索引 相关查询

 


 
CNKI小工具
在英文学术搜索中查有关新哲学思维的内容
在知识搜索中查有关新哲学思维的内容
在数字搜索中查有关新哲学思维的内容
在概念知识元中查有关新哲学思维的内容
在学术趋势中查有关新哲学思维的内容
 
 

CNKI主页设CNKI翻译助手为主页 | 收藏CNKI翻译助手 | 广告服务 | 英文学术搜索
版权图标  2008 CNKI-中国知网
京ICP证040431号 互联网出版许可证 新出网证(京)字008号
北京市公安局海淀分局 备案号:110 1081725
版权图标 2008中国知网(cnki) 中国学术期刊(光盘版)电子杂志社