助手标题  
全文文献 工具书 数字 学术定义 翻译助手 学术趋势 更多
查询帮助
意见反馈
   隐性垄断 的翻译结果: 查询用时:0.233秒
图标索引 在分类学科中查询
所有学科
企业经济
更多类别查询

图标索引 历史查询
 

隐性垄断
相关语句
  recessive monopolization
     Acquisition and Recessive Monopolization of Multinational Corporations in China
     跨国公司在华并购与隐性垄断
短句来源
  相似匹配句对
     Acquisition and Recessive Monopolization of Multinational Corporations in China
     跨国公司在华并购与隐性垄断
短句来源
     Recessive Structure
     隐性构造
短句来源
     "RECESSIVE" ENVIRONMENT OF ARCHITECTURE
     建筑的“隐性”环境
短句来源
     Reflections on Monopoly Right
     垄断权初探
短句来源
     The reasons for these are administrative monopoly;
     其原因是:行政性垄断;
短句来源
查询“隐性垄断”译词为用户自定义的双语例句

    我想查看译文中含有:的双语例句
例句
没有找到相关例句


This study investigates interday and intraday depth behavior of companies listed on Shanghai Stock Exchange (SHSE), which is an order-driven market without designated market makers. Based on 331 listed companies' intraday data from January 10, 2000 to June 30,2000, it is found that there exist significant intraweek and intraday liquidity patterns. The empirical results indicate that the intraday depth follow a reverse S-shaped pattern. The negative association between spread and depth on SHSE implies that limit...

This study investigates interday and intraday depth behavior of companies listed on Shanghai Stock Exchange (SHSE), which is an order-driven market without designated market makers. Based on 331 listed companies' intraday data from January 10, 2000 to June 30,2000, it is found that there exist significant intraweek and intraday liquidity patterns. The empirical results indicate that the intraday depth follow a reverse S-shaped pattern. The negative association between spread and depth on SHSE implies that limit order traders actively manage both price and quantity dimensions of liquidity by adjusting the spread and depth. Further, the narrower depth in the market open and the larger depth around the market close may be attribute to factors such as asymmetric information, periodic increase of demand and existence of monopolistic implicit market makers.

本文实证研究了上海股票市场日内和日际流动性———深度的变化和决定因素。上交所属于纯委托单驱动型市场 ,没有指定的做市商。市场流动性是由投资者个人和机构投资者提交的限价委托单提供的。利用从 2 0 0 0年 1月 1 0日到 2 0 0 0年 6月 3 0日之间在上交所上市的 3 3 1只股票的日内数据 ,研究发现沪市存在显著的周内和日内流动性图形。总体上看 ,日内深度图形呈倒S形。在选择了反映深度决定因素的变量如交易量、平均交易大小、方差、价格、流通市值等变量以后 ,深度的周内和日内图形仍然成立。深度和价差成负相关关系的一个重要隐含意义就是深度和价差的共同作用能够加大对流动性的影响 ,这意味着限价委托单的投资者通过调整价差和深度来提供流动性。另外 ,开盘时较小的深度和收盘时较大的深度的现象不能单独用信息不对称理论来解释 ,还应该归因于其他因素 ,诸如用周期性的需求增加理论和存在隐性的垄断做市商理论来解释。

With the tidal wave of globalization, mergers and acquisitions have become the main patterns of transnational investment, and they would be significant forms of attracting investment by China in the future. However, the phenomenon that many kinds of capitals coexist in one market of china directly determines the possibility of profit and the scope of the survival of companies. And it also determines the efficiency of investment and the stability of macro-economy. This article analyzes the way of multinational...

With the tidal wave of globalization, mergers and acquisitions have become the main patterns of transnational investment, and they would be significant forms of attracting investment by China in the future. However, the phenomenon that many kinds of capitals coexist in one market of china directly determines the possibility of profit and the scope of the survival of companies. And it also determines the efficiency of investment and the stability of macro-economy. This article analyzes the way of multinational corporations entering into China's market and their tools used in competition in china's marketplace, and then reviews the effect of transnational merger and acquisition on china's market structure from three aspects: brand, technique and market possess rate, and draws a conclusion that recessive monopolization has appeared. Finally, with two perspectives of corporations and governments, some suggestions about regulations of competitions to meet transnational mergers and acquisitions will be contributed.

在当前全球化浪潮中,跨国并购已成为跨国投资的主要方式,更是我国今后引资的重要趋势。然而这种不同性质的多种资本主体并存于中国市场的特质将直接决定彼此的生存空间和获利机会,并最终决定投资的绩效和宏观经济稳定性。分析跨国公司进入中国市场的方式和在中国市场上进行竞争的手段,并从品牌、技术和币场占有率三个方面考察跨国并购对我国市场结构的影响,可以得出已经形成隐性垄断的结论,相应地从企业和政府两个层面提出对跨国并购实施竞争规制的应对策略。

 
图标索引 相关查询

 


 
CNKI小工具
在英文学术搜索中查有关隐性垄断的内容
在知识搜索中查有关隐性垄断的内容
在数字搜索中查有关隐性垄断的内容
在概念知识元中查有关隐性垄断的内容
在学术趋势中查有关隐性垄断的内容
 
 

CNKI主页设CNKI翻译助手为主页 | 收藏CNKI翻译助手 | 广告服务 | 英文学术搜索
版权图标  2008 CNKI-中国知网
京ICP证040431号 互联网出版许可证 新出网证(京)字008号
北京市公安局海淀分局 备案号:110 1081725
版权图标 2008中国知网(cnki) 中国学术期刊(光盘版)电子杂志社