助手标题  
全文文献 工具书 数字 学术定义 翻译助手 学术趋势 更多
查询帮助
意见反馈
   人文社会科学评价 的翻译结果: 查询用时:0.421秒
图标索引 在分类学科中查询
所有学科
图书情报与数字图书馆
更多类别查询

图标索引 历史查询
 

人文社会科学评价
相关语句
  humanities and social science evaluation
     The article discussed the limitation of CSSCI as a citation index that copied SCI, and pointed out that it would bring about many problems if we managed personnel and research work in university according to CSSCI and current humanities and social science evaluation mechanism.
     仿照SCI建立的CSSCI作为引文索引工具具有明显的不足,将CSSCI与现行人文社会科学评价机制集合用于高校人事、科研量化管理,将引发诸多问题。
短句来源
  “人文社会科学评价”译为未确定词的双语例句
     Limitation and Transcendence of the Humanities and Social Sciences Evaluation
     人文社会科学评价的限制与超越
短句来源
     The paper proposes that the main contents of criteria be the truth on the fact, the goodness in function, the beauty with respect to the form and the unity of the three.
     其内容上的真 (真理标准 )、功用上的善 (价值标准 )和形式上的美 (审美标准 )及其三者的统一是人文社会科学评价标准的要旨。
短句来源
     In our country,the evaluation of human social science has become a bottleneck of the academic development. The non-scientific and unreasonale evaluation has formented a lot of improper academic phenomena and even academic corruption,which hinder the academic prosperity and development to a great extent.
     我国的人文社会科学评价已成为学术发展的瓶颈,不科学、不合理的评价已催生了大量的学术不端现象甚至学术腐败,严重阻碍了学术的繁荣和发展。
短句来源
     Through the organizing and comparing of the methods of the evaluation of human social science,this author believes that the analytic evaluation of quotation is objective in terms of fact,cumulative in terms of number,fair in terms of subject and feasable in terms of practice.
     对目前人文社会科学评价的主要方法进行梳理和比较,认为引文分析评价具有事实上的客观性、数量上的可累积性、学科上的公平性、实践上的易操作性。
短句来源
  相似匹配句对
     On the Criteria of Evaluation of the Results of Humanities
     人文社会科学成果的评价标准
短句来源
     Evaluation on Research Competitiveness of Social Sciences and Humanities among Universities
     高校人文社会科学研究竞争力评价
短句来源
     Limitation and Transcendence of the Humanities and Social Sciences Evaluation
     人文社会科学评价的限制与超越
短句来源
     On Evaluation for Humanity & Social science Research Outcomes in Oversea
     国外对人文社会科学研究成果的评价
短句来源
     A Study on Evaluation Indicator System for Journals of Humanities and Social Science
     人文社会科学期刊评价指标体系研究
短句来源
查询“人文社会科学评价”译词为用户自定义的双语例句

    我想查看译文中含有:的双语例句
例句
没有找到相关例句


The evaluation of the results of humanities is a bridge between theory and practice, and makes the rational social decisions and practical activity possible,Which requires studying the criteria of evaluation of the results of humanities comprehensively. The paper proposes that the main contents of criteria be the truth on the fact, the goodness in function, the beauty with respect to the form and the unity of the three.

对人文社会科学成果的评价是理论通向实践的必经桥梁 ,是合理的社会决策和科学实践活动的重要保证。这要求应多视角、全方位地探究人文社会科学成果的评价标准。其内容上的真 (真理标准 )、功用上的善 (价值标准 )和形式上的美 (审美标准 )及其三者的统一是人文社会科学评价标准的要旨。

The article discussed the limitation of CSSCI as a citation index that copied SCI, and pointed out that it would bring about many problems if we managed personnel and research work in university according to CSSCI and current humanities and social science evaluation mechanism. The author also emphasized that the dispute about CSSCI would help us to rethink the academic evaluation standard and university management culture and offered useful reference to found modern university institution.

仿照SCI建立的CSSCI作为引文索引工具具有明显的不足,将CSSCI与现行人文社会科学评价机制集合用于高校人事、科研量化管理,将引发诸多问题。有关CSSCI问题的争议,对于反思高校学术评价标准与管理文化有积极意义,将为建立现代大学制度提供有益借鉴。

In our country,the evaluation of human social science has become a bottleneck of the academic development.The non-scientific and unreasonale evaluation has formented a lot of improper academic phenomena and even academic corruption,which hinder the academic prosperity and development to a great extent.Through the organizing and comparing of the methods of the evaluation of human social science,this author believes that the analytic evaluation of quotation is objective in terms of fact,cumulative in terms of...

In our country,the evaluation of human social science has become a bottleneck of the academic development.The non-scientific and unreasonale evaluation has formented a lot of improper academic phenomena and even academic corruption,which hinder the academic prosperity and development to a great extent.Through the organizing and comparing of the methods of the evaluation of human social science,this author believes that the analytic evaluation of quotation is objective in terms of fact,cumulative in terms of number,fair in terms of subject and feasable in terms of practice.Thus,quotation analysis can not only be used to evaluate a single achievement,but also be used to build up an overall subject evaluation system.

我国的人文社会科学评价已成为学术发展的瓶颈,不科学、不合理的评价已催生了大量的学术不端现象甚至学术腐败,严重阻碍了学术的繁荣和发展。对目前人文社会科学评价的主要方法进行梳理和比较,认为引文分析评价具有事实上的客观性、数量上的可累积性、学科上的公平性、实践上的易操作性。这使得引文分析既可以用来评价单项成果,更适合从整体上建立学科评价体系。

 
<< 更多相关文摘    
图标索引 相关查询

 


 
CNKI小工具
在英文学术搜索中查有关人文社会科学评价的内容
在知识搜索中查有关人文社会科学评价的内容
在数字搜索中查有关人文社会科学评价的内容
在概念知识元中查有关人文社会科学评价的内容
在学术趋势中查有关人文社会科学评价的内容
 
 

CNKI主页设CNKI翻译助手为主页 | 收藏CNKI翻译助手 | 广告服务 | 英文学术搜索
版权图标  2008 CNKI-中国知网
京ICP证040431号 互联网出版许可证 新出网证(京)字008号
北京市公安局海淀分局 备案号:110 1081725
版权图标 2008中国知网(cnki) 中国学术期刊(光盘版)电子杂志社