助手标题  
全文文献 工具书 数字 学术定义 翻译助手 学术趋势 更多
查询帮助
意见反馈
   非语言思维 的翻译结果: 查询用时:0.017秒
图标索引 在分类学科中查询
所有学科
中国语言文字
更多类别查询

图标索引 历史查询
 

非语言思维
相关语句
  non-linguistic thinking
     It comes to the conclusion that there are two kinds of thinking in our cognitive process: linguistic thinking and non-linguistic thinking, and that thinking influences the language which,in turn, also influences our thinking activities.
     并得出结论:人的认知过程中,存在有两大类思维方式,语言思维和非语言思维,思维影响着我们的语言,然后,语言反过来又影响着我们的思维活动。
短句来源
  “非语言思维”译为未确定词的双语例句
     In the meantime, language is contained in certain thought forms.
     既然既有语言思维又有非语言思维,那么它们之间的关系是什么呢?
短句来源
  相似匹配句对
     Non-Arbitrariness of Language
     语言任意性
短句来源
     The Soundless Language of Kazaks
     哈萨克有声语言
短句来源
     G Language
     G语言
短句来源
     Expand Thinking
     拓展思维
短句来源
     Explore in the Thought
     思维的探险
短句来源
查询“非语言思维”译词为用户自定义的双语例句

    我想查看译文中含有:的双语例句
例句
没有找到相关例句


Linguistic thought can't be separated from language while non-linguistic thought can. The relationship between linguistic thought and non-linguistic thought is interactive. The former has a certain centrifugal force and the latter has a certain centripetal force. While the two kinds of force are under dynamic balancing, linguistic thought and non-linguistic thought co-exist in the thought.

语言思维与非语言思维的关系,认为非语言思维具有一定的向心力,语言思维具有一定的离心力,其中心点是经验,驱动力分别是感觉-肌动系统和认知压力。为验证此观点的可靠性,笔者进行了实证研究,结果支持了上述观点。

Starting from analyzing the process of language development, and based on the discussion of the nature of thinking as well as language, the paper explores the relationship between language and thinking. It comes to the conclusion that there are two kinds of thinking in our cognitive process: linguistic thinking and non-linguistic thinking, and that thinking influences the language which,in turn, also influences our thinking activities.

文章从语言的生成、习得和发展出发,通过对思维的本质、思维的种类的讨论,结合语言的属性,对语言和思维之间的关系进行了较为详细的分析和综述。并得出结论:人的认知过程中,存在有两大类思维方式,语言思维和非语言思维,思维影响着我们的语言,然后,语言反过来又影响着我们的思维活动。

What on earth is the means of thinking for human beings Do we have to think with language or may we think without language Though such questions have aroused the interest of linguists, anthropologists, psychologists, philosophers, neuro-scientists and even computer experts, up till now they still cannot offer a satisfactory and unimpeachable answer to these questions. In academic fields, there exist two extreme points of view. One is Identification and the other is Disjunction. The theories of Identification...

What on earth is the means of thinking for human beings Do we have to think with language or may we think without language Though such questions have aroused the interest of linguists, anthropologists, psychologists, philosophers, neuro-scientists and even computer experts, up till now they still cannot offer a satisfactory and unimpeachable answer to these questions. In academic fields, there exist two extreme points of view. One is Identification and the other is Disjunction. The theories of Identification see language and thinking as a single matter while the theories of Disjunction take the two apart. It is claimed by the authors that either of them has its reasonable side but both go to the extremity, and that language and thinking can be combined as well as departed from both perspectives of phylogeny and ontogeny. Thinking is actually the process of concept while words and images are terms to express and expand thinking in working storage. The course of thinking is the course of processing concepts in the brain, during which language is sometimes involved and sometimes not. Although language is one of the major means of thinking for Homo sapiens and although there is an intimate relationship between language and thinking, language is not equal to thinking, which emerges before the acquisition of language, which can also be conducted with means other than language, and which processes information much swifter than the generation of language. Therefore, it is attempted in this paper from the perspective of the relationship between language and thinking to declare that thinking can be categorized into thinking with language which may be subdivided into natural language thinking, special language (sign language and braille) thinking and formula language thinking, and thinking without language which may be subdivided into image thinking and paralinguistic thinking. If we take all these thinking models as signs, then we may conclude that thinking is by means of signs and that thinking is represented by signs in the mind.

人类究竟是用什么方式思维?一定要用语言进行思维,还是可以脱离语言进行思维?对于这些问题,科学界一直没有明确的定论。一直以来存在着两种观点:“等同说”和“分离说”。“等同说”将语言和思维视为一体,而“分离说”又将这两种东西截然分开。其实这两种观点都过于极端,因此有必要从语言和思维的关系入手来阐述人类思维的两种形式:语言思维与非语言思维

 
图标索引 相关查询

 


 
CNKI小工具
在英文学术搜索中查有关非语言思维的内容
在知识搜索中查有关非语言思维的内容
在数字搜索中查有关非语言思维的内容
在概念知识元中查有关非语言思维的内容
在学术趋势中查有关非语言思维的内容
 
 

CNKI主页设CNKI翻译助手为主页 | 收藏CNKI翻译助手 | 广告服务 | 英文学术搜索
版权图标  2008 CNKI-中国知网
京ICP证040431号 互联网出版许可证 新出网证(京)字008号
北京市公安局海淀分局 备案号:110 1081725
版权图标 2008中国知网(cnki) 中国学术期刊(光盘版)电子杂志社