助手标题  
全文文献 工具书 数字 学术定义 翻译助手 学术趋势 更多
查询帮助
意见反馈
   picc导管 在 临床医学 分类中 的翻译结果: 查询用时:0.229秒
图标索引 在分类学科中查询
所有学科
临床医学
更多类别查询

图标索引 历史查询
 

picc导管
相关语句
  picc catheter
    Application of PICC Catheter in Breast Carcinoma after Operation and Related Nursing
    PICC导管在乳腺癌术后化疗的应用及护理
短句来源
    Results PICC catheter was kept in the peripheral veins for 15 to 350 days, with a mean of 147. 9 days.
    结果 应用PICC导管60例,留置时间15~350d,平均147.9d,无并发症发生。
短句来源
    Methods PICC catheter was used in 60 tumor patients through the peripheral veins. The puncture site was cubital fossa vein. The end of the PICC catheter was finally indwelled in the superior vena cava or inside the collarbone superior vena.
    方法 对60例肿瘤患者应用中心静脉导管(PICC导管),从肘部静脉穿刺,将导管置入至上腔静脉或锁骨上静脉内。
短句来源
    Objective:To observe the clinical effect of deep vein tunnel in application of PICC catheter(a catheter inserted to central venous through peripheral vein)in chemotherapy of patients with breast carcinoma after operation.
    目的:应用P ICC导管(经外周静脉插入中心静脉导管)为乳腺癌术后化疗患者建立深静脉通道,观察其临床效果。
短句来源
    Methods:PICC catheter was inserted to superior vena cava through uninjured side basilic vein or median cubital vein for receving chemotherapy.
    方法:经患者健侧上肢贵要静脉、肘正中静脉将P ICC导管置入上腔静脉进行化疗。
短句来源
  “picc导管”译为未确定词的双语例句
    Application of PICC in Drainage of Malignant Ascites
    PICC导管在恶性腹水引流中的应用
短句来源
    Analysis on reason of abnormal catheter removal of PICC during NICU
    NICU中PICC导管非正常拔管原因分析
短句来源
    Treatment of One Case of Reversal of PICC in Axillary Rein Under the Guidance of B-Ultrasound
    B超引导下处理PICC导管回折腋静脉1例
短句来源
    Salvage measure for damange of the end of PICC
    PICC导管末端破损的补救措施
短句来源
    The Comparisons of Indwelling PICC through Superficial Temporal Vein and Basilic Vein in Neonates
    新生儿经颞浅静脉与贵要静脉留置PICC导管效果比较
短句来源
更多       
查询“picc导管”译词为用户自定义的双语例句

    我想查看译文中含有:的双语例句
例句
没有找到相关例句


Purpose To study prospectively the feasibility, complications, mid-and long-term advantages of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) compared with central venous access in surgical patients. Materials and methode During the period between 1997 and 1998, we conducted a prospective study in 60 Surgical patients placed PICC lines and 60 surgical patients placed central lines. Study variables included three varying sizes of PICC, tip placement and complication rates of single-slumen PICCs compared with...

Purpose To study prospectively the feasibility, complications, mid-and long-term advantages of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) compared with central venous access in surgical patients. Materials and methode During the period between 1997 and 1998, we conducted a prospective study in 60 Surgical patients placed PICC lines and 60 surgical patients placed central lines. Study variables included three varying sizes of PICC, tip placement and complication rates of single-slumen PICCs compared with central venous access. Results A total PICC placement was 95% successful in 60 of 63 surgical patients. The mean duration PICC catheters in place before removal was 13 days (6~98 days) and 14 days (7~104 days) in central catheter. In PICC group patients, fifty-three catheters (88. 3 %) were removed folowing completion of therapy. The occlusion rate is higher in 3Fr (20-gauge) catheter (4/20,20%) than in 4Fr. (18-gauge) catheters (2/20, 10%) and in 5Fr (16-gauge) catheters (1/20, 5%). Phlebit is occurred in 5% patients (3/60) and one catheter fracture was happened on the catheter-hub junction (1. 7%). The catheter tip disbotion occurred in 3 cases with PICC (3/60, 5 %) and 1 case with central catheter (1/60, 1.7 %). No catheter-related Sepsis, pnemothorax or hemopnemothorax happened in both group patients. Conclusions PICC lines are satisfy mid-and long-term used in the patients receiving a variety of solutions, primarily parenteral nutrition, chemotherapy or antibiotic infusion. The new method provides a reliable,effective venos access and many possible severa complications of central venous access. The convenience of placement and maintaining a PICC with lower risks of complications compared with central venous access makes it attractive in-hospital use.

目的对比经外周静脉至中心静脉置管(PeripherallyInsertedCentralCatheter,PICC)与传统的经锁骨下静脉至中心静脉置管(CentralVenousCatheter,CVC),在外科病人中长期应用的方便性、优越性及并发症。方法自1997年至1998年期间,对60例外科病人经外周静脉至中心静脉置管与60例外科病人经锁骨下静脉至中心静脉置管进行前瞻性研究。研究观察指标包括:三种不同型号的单腔PICC导管、导管尖端的置管位置、并发症发生率与传统的中心静脉置管(CVC)进行相应比较。结果PICC置管成功率为95%(60例置管/63例穿刺)。PICC与CVC置管时间平均为13天(6~98天)与14天(7~104天)。PICC组中,53例病人(88.3%)于治疗结束时拨除导管;3Fr导管(20G穿刺针)阻塞率(4/20,20%)高于4Fr导管(18G穿刺针)阻塞率(2/20,10%)和SFr导管(16G穿刺针)阻塞率(1/20,5%);外周静脉炎的发生率为5%(3/60),PICC导管接头破裂1例(1.7%);置管导管尖端异位5%(3/60)。CVC组中仅1例(1.7...

目的对比经外周静脉至中心静脉置管(PeripherallyInsertedCentralCatheter,PICC)与传统的经锁骨下静脉至中心静脉置管(CentralVenousCatheter,CVC),在外科病人中长期应用的方便性、优越性及并发症。方法自1997年至1998年期间,对60例外科病人经外周静脉至中心静脉置管与60例外科病人经锁骨下静脉至中心静脉置管进行前瞻性研究。研究观察指标包括:三种不同型号的单腔PICC导管、导管尖端的置管位置、并发症发生率与传统的中心静脉置管(CVC)进行相应比较。结果PICC置管成功率为95%(60例置管/63例穿刺)。PICC与CVC置管时间平均为13天(6~98天)与14天(7~104天)。PICC组中,53例病人(88.3%)于治疗结束时拨除导管;3Fr导管(20G穿刺针)阻塞率(4/20,20%)高于4Fr导管(18G穿刺针)阻塞率(2/20,10%)和SFr导管(16G穿刺针)阻塞率(1/20,5%);外周静脉炎的发生率为5%(3/60),PICC导管接头破裂1例(1.7%);置管导管尖端异位5%(3/60)。CVC组中仅1例(1.7%)置管导管尖端异位。两组均无置管所致的导管感染、气胸及血气胸发生。结论PICC可以安全地应用于需要中-长期接受各种输液、肠外营养液、化疗以及抗菌素治疗的病人。这种新方法不但提供了一种可靠、有效的静脉输液

Objectives To explore the timing of peripheral conducted central vein indwelling catheter.Method Daily observing records for 102 cases patients with PICC intubation from Feb. 2000 to Feb. 2002 in department of pediatrics were conducted and analyzed.Result the days for indwelling catheter was 7~396, averaged 138 days,2 cases of stage I phlebitis occurred, 2 cases with bleeding in puncture point,2 cases with fluid leakage, 12 cases with duct block. All catheter are. unabridged arter pull out and bacterial fostering...

Objectives To explore the timing of peripheral conducted central vein indwelling catheter.Method Daily observing records for 102 cases patients with PICC intubation from Feb. 2000 to Feb. 2002 in department of pediatrics were conducted and analyzed.Result the days for indwelling catheter was 7~396, averaged 138 days,2 cases of stage I phlebitis occurred, 2 cases with bleeding in puncture point,2 cases with fluid leakage, 12 cases with duct block. All catheter are. unabridged arter pull out and bacterial fostering negative.There is no significantly difference between fluid leakage and time of indwelling catheter( P < 0.05 ).Conclusion PICC indwelling catheter coule exceed one year.But close observation of complication are necessary, and put forward the measurement for complication prevention.

目的探讨外周导入中心静脉置管留置时间。方法对 2 0 0 0年 2月~ 2 0 0 2年 2月在中山大学附属第一医院儿科病房进行PICC插管的 10 2例病人进行每日观察并记录。结果导管留置天数 7~ 396天 ,平均留置时间 138天 ,发生Ⅰ级静脉炎 2例 ,穿刺点出血 2例 ,液体外渗 2例 ,导管堵塞 12例 ,拔管后导管全部完整 ,细菌培养全部阴性。经临床观察发现 ,静脉炎的发生和穿刺点出血、渗液与留置时间差异无显著性意义 (P >0 .0 5 )。结论PICC导管留置时间可以超过一年 ,但要密切观察是否有并发症发生 ,并提出了并发症的预防措施。

Objective To develop a better treatment method so as to improve the quality of life, protect peripheral-veins and alleviate pain from repeated puncture, prevent and decrease the occurrence of phlebitis and leakage injury, and improve the quality of nursing. Methods PICC catheter was used in 60 tumor patients through the peripheral veins. The puncture site was cubital fossa vein. The end of the PICC catheter was finally indwelled in the superior vena cava or inside the collarbone superior vena. Results PICC catheter...

Objective To develop a better treatment method so as to improve the quality of life, protect peripheral-veins and alleviate pain from repeated puncture, prevent and decrease the occurrence of phlebitis and leakage injury, and improve the quality of nursing. Methods PICC catheter was used in 60 tumor patients through the peripheral veins. The puncture site was cubital fossa vein. The end of the PICC catheter was finally indwelled in the superior vena cava or inside the collarbone superior vena. Results PICC catheter was kept in the peripheral veins for 15 to 350 days, with a mean of 147. 9 days. Conclusion Use of PICC catheter improved the life quality of the patients and promoted the community nursing. In addition, puncture procedure is easy to follow, centesis is safe to operate and retention time is longer with fewer complications.

目的 保护化疗肿瘤患者的外周静脉,减少反复穿刺带给患者的痛苦,预防和减少化疗所致静脉炎、渗漏性损伤的发生。方法 对60例肿瘤患者应用中心静脉导管(PICC导管),从肘部静脉穿刺,将导管置入至上腔静脉或锁骨上静脉内。结果 应用PICC导管60例,留置时间15~350d,平均147.9d,无并发症发生。结论 PICC导管的应用提高了患者的生存质量。该穿刺技术容易掌握,穿刺成功率高,中心静脉导管留置时间长而安全。

 
<< 更多相关文摘    
图标索引 相关查询

 


 
CNKI小工具
在英文学术搜索中查有关picc导管的内容
在知识搜索中查有关picc导管的内容
在数字搜索中查有关picc导管的内容
在概念知识元中查有关picc导管的内容
在学术趋势中查有关picc导管的内容
 
 

CNKI主页设CNKI翻译助手为主页 | 收藏CNKI翻译助手 | 广告服务 | 英文学术搜索
版权图标  2008 CNKI-中国知网
京ICP证040431号 互联网出版许可证 新出网证(京)字008号
北京市公安局海淀分局 备案号:110 1081725
版权图标 2008中国知网(cnki) 中国学术期刊(光盘版)电子杂志社