Medication It was lower significantly in the preemptive analgesia group as compared with the post-operative analgesia group(67.9±6.9),84.3±5.7 mL,t=11.549,P < 0.01.
The patients in group B were given intravenous injection of propofol 2.5~3.0 mg/kg in 50 seconds before operation. Required propofol 0.5 mg/kg by intravenous injection were given during operation. It was observed that the effect of anesthesia during operation, post-operative analgesia and the dose of propofol in both groups.
To compare the analgesic and side effects of post-operative analgesia with epidural neostigmine (Neo), morphine (Mor) or both in patients underwent abdominal surgery.
Conclusion Both 0.1% bupivacaine and 0.1% ropivacaine can be safely and effectively used to control postoperative pain without adverse effect on circulation and respiration in advanced age patients underwent selective TURP .
5 adult patients (ASAⅠ~Ⅱ)were randomly divided into ketorolac group (group Ⅰ),epidural bupivacaine morphine mixture group(group Ⅱ),and a combination of group Ⅰ and Ⅱ (group Ⅲ)for postoperative pain.
Conclusion The postoperative analgesic effect of epidural injection of 0.05mg buprenorphine is definite. It is a safe,effective,simple and feasible method for postoperative pain.
The postoperative analgesic requirement rate was higher in the TAH Group(75.4%,36 cases) than in the TVH Group(30.2%,11 cases) and the LAVH Group(38.4%,12 cases)(χ~2=20.310,P=0.000).
The postoperative analgesic requirement rate was higher in the TAH Group(74.1%,785 cases) than in the TVH Group(20.8%,15 cases) and the LAVH Group(18.6%,11 cases).
①The postoperative analgesic effect was satisfying in cryoanalgesia group, and the mean value of VAS score was significantly lower in cryoanalgesia group than in control group (2.20 vs. 8.23, P < 0.05).
Group ropivacaine hydrochloride received 15 ml ropivacaine hydrochloride of 7.5 mg/ml in anesthetic and 2 mg/ml in postoperative analgesic subsequently while group ropivacaine mesylate corre-spondingly received ropivacaine mesylate of both 15 ml of 8.94 mg/ml and 2.374 mg/ml.
The purpose of the paper was to assess and to compare the effectiveness and safety of patient controlled epidural analgesia using tramadol or morphine for postoperative analgesia after major urological surgeries.
Aims: This study was designed to evaluate the effects of epidural dexamethasone as an analgesic agent for postoperative analgesia after lumbar laminectomy.
To establish an effective method of continuous quality control of acute pain service, a retrospective study on incident reporting during postoperative analgesia period was conducted.
Systemic opioids and thoracic epidural analgesia are common techniques used to provide post-operative analgesia following thoracoscopy (video-assisted thoracic surgery).
The plasma levels of morphine were lower than that regarded sufficient for post-operative analgesia in all but two patients, indicating a possibility of peripheral analgesia.
Visual analogue scale (VAS) showed no difference in postoperative pain comparing closure to nonclosure of the peritoneum but patients of the control group required significantly more postoperative opioids.
The degree of postoperative pain was assessed by visual analogue scale at postoperative 6, 12, and 24 hours and postoperative analgesic requirement was recorded.
Conclusion: Forced aspiration at the end of laparoscopy is a simple measure that reduces intraperitoneal residue CO2 intensity of shoulder pain, and postoperative analgesic requirement.
Time to first postoperative analgesic need (TFA), the supplementary analgesia and the amount of epidural morphine used over a 48-h period were noted for the groups.
There is only a weak relationship between the described objective changes in sensory processing after surgical nociception and subjective clinical pain measures such as pain intensity scales or postoperative analgesic consumption.