助手标题  
全文文献 工具书 数字 学术定义 翻译助手 学术趋势 更多
查询帮助
意见反馈
   刺伤点 在 外科学 分类中 的翻译结果: 查询用时:0.059秒
图标索引 在分类学科中查询
所有学科
外科学
消化系统疾病
急救医学
更多类别查询

图标索引 历史查询
 

刺伤点
相关语句
  stab wound point
    there was one stab wound point in terminal wound and thick unpenetrated omental wound.
    网膜伤的网膜厚未穿透者,终末伤为一处刺伤点
短句来源
    The major stab wound point was odd number whose percentage was higher than that of no stab wound and even number (P<0 01).
    奇数刺伤点占大多数,与无刺伤、偶数相比较,P< 0-01 。
短句来源
    Methods A retrospective analysis was done on 279 cases with abdominal wall penetrative wound, in which different numbers of stab wound point of celiac organ were found via exploration laparotomy.
    方法回顾性分析279例腹壁穿透伤,经剖腹探查分析腹腔器官刺伤点数目。
短句来源
  stab wound points
    even number stab wound points were 16 (9.0%).
    偶数刺伤点为16 例,占9-0% ;
短句来源
    Results Odd number stab wound points were found in 135 cases (75 8%);
    结果 178 例剖腹探查结果的奇数刺伤点135 例,占75-8% ;
短句来源
    The clinical value of the number of stab wound points in abdominal stab wound
    腹部刺伤时腹腔器官刺伤点数目的临床价值
短句来源
    Results There were 211 cases (75. 6 % ) with odd number of stab wound points, 20 (7. 2%) with even number of stab wound points, but 48 (17. 2%) with no stab wound, with statistical difference (P<0. 01).
    结果279例剖腹探查结果的奇数刺伤点2111例,占75.6%; 无刺伤48例,占17.2%;
短句来源
    Further exploration laparotomy proved that 13 stab wound points were missed in cases without stab wound and 11 in even stab wound.
    奇数刺伤点与无刺伤、偶数比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。 由于再次剖腹探查证实,无刺伤有13例遗漏,偶数刺伤点有11例遗漏。
短句来源
更多       
  “刺伤点”译为未确定词的双语例句
    Re celiotomy revealed that there were 7 missing diagnoses in no wound cases and 6 missing diagnoses in even number cases, so accurate cases of odd number were 148 (83 1%).
    由于再次剖腹探查证实,无刺伤有7 例漏诊,偶数刺伤点患者有6 例遗漏,所以真正的奇数点为148 例,发生率83-1 % 。
短句来源
    Objective To study how to avoid missing foci of stab wound during exploration laparotomy after abdominal stab wound.
    目的探讨腹部刺伤后剖腹探查时,如何避免遗漏刺伤点病灶。
短句来源
查询“刺伤点”译词为用户自定义的双语例句

    我想查看译文中含有:的双语例句
例句
没有找到相关例句


Objective To study the relationship between the number of stab wound points and abdominal stab wound for purpose in avoiding the omittance of foci of stab wound during abdominal stab celiotomy. Methods In a retrospective analysis of 178 abdominal wall penetrative wound, different numbers of stab wound point of celiac organ were found. The caculating method was as follows: there were two stab wound points in tangential wound, penetrative wound, mesenteric wound and thin penetrated omental wound; there was one...

Objective To study the relationship between the number of stab wound points and abdominal stab wound for purpose in avoiding the omittance of foci of stab wound during abdominal stab celiotomy. Methods In a retrospective analysis of 178 abdominal wall penetrative wound, different numbers of stab wound point of celiac organ were found. The caculating method was as follows: there were two stab wound points in tangential wound, penetrative wound, mesenteric wound and thin penetrated omental wound; there was one stab wound point in terminal wound and thick unpenetrated omental wound. Results Odd number stab wound points were found in 135 cases (75 8%); no stab wounds were 27 (15 2%); even number stab wound points were 16 (9.0%). The major stab wound point was odd number whose percentage was higher than that of no stab wound and even number (P<0 01). Re celiotomy revealed that there were 7 missing diagnoses in no wound cases and 6 missing diagnoses in even number cases, so accurate cases of odd number were 148 (83 1%). Conclusion The stab wound points of celiac organ is mostly odd number. If no stab wounds or even number ones are present in abdominal stab celiotomy, a covered stab wound point should be considered. Further detailed exposure is necessary in order to avoid missing stab wound points.

目的 为了避免腹部刺伤后,剖腹探查时刺伤点病灶的遗漏。方法 回顾性分析178 例腹壁穿透伤,经剖腹探查证实腹腔器官刺伤点数目是不同的,其计算方法:切线伤、穿透伤、系膜伤、网膜伤的网膜薄已穿透者为两处刺伤点;网膜伤的网膜厚未穿透者,终末伤为一处刺伤点。结果 178 例剖腹探查结果的奇数刺伤点135 例,占75-8% ;无刺伤27 例,占15-2 % ;偶数刺伤点为16 例,占9-0% ;奇数刺伤点占大多数,与无刺伤、偶数相比较,P< 0-01 。由于再次剖腹探查证实,无刺伤有7 例漏诊,偶数刺伤点患者有6 例遗漏,所以真正的奇数点为148 例,发生率83-1 % 。结论 腹部刺伤时腹腔器官刺伤点一般多为奇数,如果剖腹探查为偶数或者为无刺伤时,应想到还有1 个隐蔽的刺伤点尚未发现,进一步详尽探查以防遗漏刺伤点病灶。

Objective To study how to avoid missing foci of stab wound during exploration laparotomy after abdominal stab wound. Methods A retrospective analysis was done on 279 cases with abdominal wall penetrative wound, in which different numbers of stab wound point of celiac organ were found via exploration laparotomy. Results There were 211 cases (75. 6 % ) with odd number of stab wound points, 20 (7. 2%) with even number of stab wound points, but 48 (17. 2%) with no stab wound, with statistical difference (P<0. 01)....

Objective To study how to avoid missing foci of stab wound during exploration laparotomy after abdominal stab wound. Methods A retrospective analysis was done on 279 cases with abdominal wall penetrative wound, in which different numbers of stab wound point of celiac organ were found via exploration laparotomy. Results There were 211 cases (75. 6 % ) with odd number of stab wound points, 20 (7. 2%) with even number of stab wound points, but 48 (17. 2%) with no stab wound, with statistical difference (P<0. 01). Further exploration laparotomy proved that 13 stab wound points were missed in cases without stab wound and 11 in even stab wound. Real odd number of stab wound was in 235 cases, with incidence rate of 84. 2%. Conclusions The number of stab wound points of celiac organ is mostly odd. If no stab wounds or even number ones are present in exploration laparotomy , a covered stab wound point should be considered. Further detailed exploration is necessary to avoid missing stab wound points.

目的探讨腹部刺伤后剖腹探查时,如何避免遗漏刺伤点病灶。方法回顾性分析279例腹壁穿透伤,经剖腹探查分析腹腔器官刺伤点数目。结果279例剖腹探查结果的奇数刺伤点2111例,占75.6%;无刺伤48例,占17.2%;偶数刺伤点为20例,占7.2%。奇数刺伤点与无刺伤、偶数比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。由于再次剖腹探查证实,无刺伤有13例遗漏,偶数刺伤点有11例遗漏。所以真正的奇数点为235例,发生率为84.2%。结论腹部刺伤时腹腔器官刺伤点数多为奇数,如果剖腹探查者为偶数或为无刺伤时,应想到还有一个隐蔽的刺伤点尚未发现;此时应进一步详尽探查,以防遗漏刺伤点病灶酿成严重后果。

 
图标索引 相关查询

 


 
CNKI小工具
在英文学术搜索中查有关刺伤点的内容
在知识搜索中查有关刺伤点的内容
在数字搜索中查有关刺伤点的内容
在概念知识元中查有关刺伤点的内容
在学术趋势中查有关刺伤点的内容
 
 

CNKI主页设CNKI翻译助手为主页 | 收藏CNKI翻译助手 | 广告服务 | 英文学术搜索
版权图标  2008 CNKI-中国知网
京ICP证040431号 互联网出版许可证 新出网证(京)字008号
北京市公安局海淀分局 备案号:110 1081725
版权图标 2008中国知网(cnki) 中国学术期刊(光盘版)电子杂志社