助手标题  
全文文献 工具书 数字 学术定义 翻译助手 学术趋势 更多
查询帮助
意见反馈
   表面效度 的翻译结果: 查询用时:0.48秒
图标索引 在分类学科中查询
所有学科
外国语言文字
更多类别查询

图标索引 历史查询
 

表面效度
相关语句
  face validity
     Results There were good face validity,content validity(CVI>0.8)and construct validity in Chinese version MSI.
     结果中文版MSI具有较好的表面效度、内容效度(CVI>0.8)和结构效度。
短句来源
     (3)To assess the face validity.
     (3) 对量表进行表面效度评估。
短句来源
     Face validity,construct validity and concurrent validity of different tasks are analyzed.
     通过表面效度、并存效度和结构效度的分析,本研究发现B类任务+C类任务组合是效度最高的任务。
短句来源
     Results Cronbach's a coefficient of two questionnaires were 0.9764 and 0.9699, and their face validity and content validity were proper.
     结果 两轮专家咨询问卷的克朗巴赫α系数分别为0.9764、0.9699,问卷均具有较好表面效度和内容效度;
短句来源
     After 5 dialysis nurses and 10 hemodialysis patients performing evaluation of the content validity and face validity,4 sub questionnaires were constructed with 59 items were used to measure self management behavior of 120 hemodialysis patients.
     5名透析护士和10名血液透析患者分别评价问卷的内容效度和表面效度。 问卷包含4个下位尺度59个项目,120名患者参加了调查。
短句来源
更多       
  “表面效度”译为未确定词的双语例句
     Validity can be divided into different category based on different standard.
     效度可以被划分为内容效度、结构效度、同期效度、预期效度和表面效度
短句来源
     Split-half Reliability test, Cronbach' a and Item-total Correlation method are used to make Reliability analysis, the Surface validity and Content Validity are verified as well.
     正式施测后,用分半信度、Cronbach’α系数及Item-total Correlation进行信度检验,并论证了量表的表面效度和内容效度。
短句来源
     The re-measurable reliability Kappa degree of CBSS is between 0.56 and 0.73. Experts estimate that the surface validity and structure validity are both very high.
     儿童行为监测系统的复测信度Kappa值在0.56~0.73之间; 专家评价表面效度和结构效度均较高;
短句来源
     Th ere was no significant difference between questionnaire results and Caltrac moti on sensor for both boys and girls,and the questionnaire correlated significantly ( r= 0.46 , 0.38 for different measures of activity) with Caltrac m otion sensor for boys.
     问卷表面效度和内容效度较高 ,问卷结果与Caltrac测量仪结果之间在男女生中差异均无显著性 ,而且两种测量方法在男生中存在显著的正相关关系 (r =0 .46、0 .3 8)。
短句来源
     Methods The reliability was evaluated with Cronbach alpha and Guttman Split-half, the construct and content validity of the questionnaire was evaluated with factor analysis.
     方法通过分析克朗巴赫系数α、分半信度和表面效度、结构效度,评价调查问卷的信度和效度。
短句来源
更多       
  相似匹配句对
     (3)To assess the face validity.
     (3) 对量表进行表面效度评估。
短句来源
     Smart Surface
     智能表面
短句来源
     SURFACE MELTING
     表面熔化
短句来源
     Surface validity and content validity were in accord with the experts and people recognizing.
     表面效度、内容效度都符合专家和公众的认同。
短句来源
     The Development of the Validity Theory
     效度理论的变迁
短句来源
查询“表面效度”译词为用户自定义的双语例句

    我想查看译文中含有:的双语例句
例句
为了更好的帮助您理解掌握查询词或其译词在地道英语中的实际用法,我们为您准备了出自英文原文的大量英语例句,供您参考。
  face validity
The NCS dataset included a set of 14 items that have face validity as a measure of current emotional distress (depression and anxiety) and could serve as a potentially useful continuous measure of psychological distress.
      
Selective attention is given to issues of admissibility, researchprocedures, face validity, voice identification, lineup fairness, showupsand lineups, and common knowledge.
      
Of the 18 models, five could only be assessed for predictive, validity, seven could be assessed for predictive and face validity, and six could potentially have predictive, face and construct validity.
      
It is concluded that a combination of good construct validity and good face validity represents a necessary condition for screening tests with predictive validity, and that the most popular paradigms fail to fulfil these criteria.
      
Also the face validity of conditioned USV towards situational panic attacks is high.
      
更多          


This is a report based on a survey conducted among some teachers and students at the English Department of Xi'an Foreign Language University to evaluate the content validity and face validity of the teacher-made tests for the intensive English courses. Some problem areas were identified,and questions concerning test item improvement and reform in test administration were raised for further research.

本文分析和总结了对西安外院英语系教师自行设计的精读考试的内容效度和表面效度的一次问卷调查结果 ,并在命题、考试实施及管理等方面提出了 9个有待探讨和研究的问题 ,以引起广大教师和教学管理人员的思考和重视 ,从而改进我们的命题质量 ,加强考试管理 ,促进考试对教学的积极导向作用 ,使考试更好地为教学服务。

Objective To develop the Child Neglect Norms(CNN) of urban children aged 3-6 years and provide a measure tool and evaluation criterion for carrying out study,investigation and prevention on child neglect in China.Methods (1)1?457 children (726 males(49.8%)) were randomly sampled from 5 cities,which were representatives of 7 administrative regions of China in accordance with sex,age.The minority nationality's proportion was 4.9%.(2)The questionnaire was composed of 146 items of 6 subscales.The data were collected...

Objective To develop the Child Neglect Norms(CNN) of urban children aged 3-6 years and provide a measure tool and evaluation criterion for carrying out study,investigation and prevention on child neglect in China.Methods (1)1?457 children (726 males(49.8%)) were randomly sampled from 5 cities,which were representatives of 7 administrative regions of China in accordance with sex,age.The minority nationality's proportion was 4.9%.(2)The questionnaire was composed of 146 items of 6 subscales.The data were collected by trained professional staff.(3)Data were analysed by item's distinguishing power analysis,factor analysis,internal consistency analysis to delete unsuitable items,subscales and age groups;by reliability analysis(Cronbach's alphas,Split-half reliability,the test-reliability,parallel reliability)and validity analysis(construction validity,face validity and exterior validity)to formal scales and then determine corresponding parameters to finish final norms.Results (1)General characteristic:①CNN scores( ±s ) for the male children was not significantly different form that for female children.②There was no significant difference between male and female children for each of the 6 neglect subscales.(2)Developing scales:The overall scale was developed by item's distinguishing power analysis,factor analysis and iternal consistency analysis in which 53 items and 1 subscale(the social neglect subscale)were removed from the initial questionnaire.The final CNN scale contained 91 items of 5 neglect subscales.Reliability analysis(coefficient of Internal consistency,Split-half reliability,Test-retest reliability and parallel reliability of the overall CNN and all neglect subscale)and Validity analysis(The construction Validity,Cronbach's alphas,Face Vialidity and Exterior Validity)were perfect.(3)Cut-off Point of the CNN:Percentile 90( P 90 ) of the score on each neglect subscale and the overall scale were respectively;physical neglect subscale 35,emotion 80,education 40,safety 20 and medicine 15,the overall scale 190.Conclusion The CNN which consisted of 91 items of 5 scales may evaluate physical,emotional,educational,medical and safe neglect situation for children respectively.It may also be useful in assessing parent's and child-caregiver's behaviors and attitude.

目的 研究制定评价儿童忽视的工具和标准 ;同时为父母及保教人员科学养育孩子提供行为指南。方法  (1)在全国 7个行政大区 2 5个代表性城市 2~ 6岁儿童中随机抽取有效样本 145 7例 ,男女各半 ,少数民族占4 9%。 (2 )儿童忽视问卷由 6个层面的 146个题项组成。 (3 )对所收集的数据 ,经题项难易度分析、项目分析、因素分析和内部一致性检验 ,逐步删除不适宜题项、层面和年龄组 ;经信度分析、效度分析 ,从而形成正式量表 ;再确定相应的参数 ,最终完成常模的研制。结果  (1)一般特征 :男童与女童量表忽视总分比较无显著性差异 ;男、女童在 6个忽视层面得分均值比较也均无显著性差异。 (2 )量表的形成 :经过项目分析、因素分析及内部一致性检验 ,逐步删除 5 3个不适宜题项及 1个层面 ,最终形成由 5个层面 91个题项组成的总量表 ;再经信度分析 (总量表及各忽视层面的内部一致性系数α、分半信度 ,重测信度 ,平行信度等 )和效度分析 (结构效度、外部效度、表面效度等 ) ,结果均较理想 ,达到了常模的要求。 (3 )忽视界值点的确定 :总量表及每一忽视层面得分的第 90百分...

目的 研究制定评价儿童忽视的工具和标准 ;同时为父母及保教人员科学养育孩子提供行为指南。方法  (1)在全国 7个行政大区 2 5个代表性城市 2~ 6岁儿童中随机抽取有效样本 145 7例 ,男女各半 ,少数民族占4 9%。 (2 )儿童忽视问卷由 6个层面的 146个题项组成。 (3 )对所收集的数据 ,经题项难易度分析、项目分析、因素分析和内部一致性检验 ,逐步删除不适宜题项、层面和年龄组 ;经信度分析、效度分析 ,从而形成正式量表 ;再确定相应的参数 ,最终完成常模的研制。结果  (1)一般特征 :男童与女童量表忽视总分比较无显著性差异 ;男、女童在 6个忽视层面得分均值比较也均无显著性差异。 (2 )量表的形成 :经过项目分析、因素分析及内部一致性检验 ,逐步删除 5 3个不适宜题项及 1个层面 ,最终形成由 5个层面 91个题项组成的总量表 ;再经信度分析 (总量表及各忽视层面的内部一致性系数α、分半信度 ,重测信度 ,平行信度等 )和效度分析 (结构效度、外部效度、表面效度等 ) ,结果均较理想 ,达到了常模的要求。 (3 )忽视界值点的确定 :总量表及每一忽视层面得分的第 90百分位数 (P90 )分别是 :身体忽视层面 3 5分、情感忽视层面 80分、教育忽视层面 40分、医疗忽视层面 15分、安全忽视层面 2 0分 ;总忽视界值点

Objective Child abuse and neglect (CNS) increasingly have become a serious problem in modern society all over the world. Children neglected and abused are at risk for maladaptation in behavioral, emotional, social, cognitive, and physical functioning. The purpose of this investigation was to develop the Child Neglect Scale for children aged 3 -6 years in Chinese urban areas and to test the reliability and validity of this norm. Methods According to the principle and procedure of developing scales, a child...

Objective Child abuse and neglect (CNS) increasingly have become a serious problem in modern society all over the world. Children neglected and abused are at risk for maladaptation in behavioral, emotional, social, cognitive, and physical functioning. The purpose of this investigation was to develop the Child Neglect Scale for children aged 3 -6 years in Chinese urban areas and to test the reliability and validity of this norm. Methods According to the principle and procedure of developing scales, a child neglect questionnaire was designed. Multistage sampling was used in the study in accordance with sex, age, the levels of economy and kindergartens, a random sample of 1 465 children aged 2-6 years was selected from 25 cities. Of the 1 465 subjects who completed the Child Neglect Questionnaires again 2 weeks later, 66 had completed data on each of the two occasions. The Child Neglect Questionnaires were completed by parents and caregivers. The data were analyzed using items analysis, factor analysis, internal consistency analysis and the reliability and validity of the norm were tested. The factor structure of the Child Neglect Scale was determined using an oblique rotation. The internal consistency was reflected in Cronbach′s alpha. Since no existing categorization scheme on child neglect could be found in the literature, one was formulated in an attempt to efficiently and meaningfully group similar types of caregiver behaviors. The initial pool of potentially neglecting caregiver behaviors was drawn from literature. The most common patterns of parental behaviors were grouped according to six neglect subscale schemes found in the literature, with modifications made to increase item specificity and reduce overlap. The initial Child Neglect Questionnaire contained a 25-item physical neglect subscale, a 59-item emotional neglect subscale, a 23-item educational neglect subscale, a 20-item safety neglect subscale, a 10-item medical neglect subscale, a 9-item social neglect subscale. Results Completed Child Neglect Questionnaires were obtained from 1 457 subjects, 726 males and 731 females. The overall findings of this study came from 1 163 subjects, because children aged 2 years (294 subjects) were removed from subjects by statistical method. The 91-item Child Neglect Scale was presented to the respondent as a child neglect questionnaire with a 9-item social neglect subscale and some items in other subscales were removed from the initial questionnaire by using statistical method. The questionaire contained 17 physical neglect items, 40 emotional neglect items, 17 educational neglect items, a 10 safety neglect items, and 7 medical neglect items. The internal consistency of the overall Child Neglect Scale as reflected in Cronbach′s alpha was 0.94, the split-half reliability was 0.88, the test-retest reliability was 0.92. For physical, emotional, educational, safety, medical neglect subscale, Cronbach′s alpha, respectively was 0.80, 0.88, 0.84, 0.68 0.60, the split-half reliability was 0.54-0.88, the test reliability was 0.89, 0.94, 0.87, 0.80, 0.77, respectively. The construct validity, face validity and exterior validity of the norm were good. For physical, emotional, educational, safety, medical neglect subscale and overall child neglect scale, the scores of percentiles 90 were used as cut-point. They were 35,80,40,20,15,190, respectively. Conclusions The norm was consistent with China′s economic-cultural background and reality. It not only may be used for research purpose but also may be useful in assessing parent′s and child-oriented individual′s behaviors and attitude as a measuring instrument.

目的 建立中国 3~ 6岁城市儿童忽视常模 ,并对其信度和效度进行检验。方法 复习文献 ,自行设计调查问卷 ;采用多阶段分层整群随机抽样方法 ,在全国 2 5个城市采样 14 6 5例 ;对样本中的 6 6例间隔 2周重复测查———评价重测信度。调查问卷均由家长或看护人 (和被测查儿童在一起生活 1年以上 )填写 ;采用项目分析、因素分析和信度分析等统计学方法重新建构量表并检验其信度和效度。结果 用统计学方法删除了不适宜题项 ,去除了社会忽视层面 ,排除了 2岁组研究对象 ,最终确定了由 91个题项组成的正式量表 ,它包括身体、情感、教育、安全和医疗等 5个忽视层面 ,分别包含 17、4 0、17,10、7个题项。采用身体、情感、教育、安全和医疗等各忽视层面及总量表得分的第 90百分位数的分值作为划界分 ,分别为 35、80、4 0、2 0、15、190分。总量表的内在信度是 0 94 ,分半信度为0 88,重测信度为 0 92。对于身体、情感、教育、安全和医疗等 5个忽视层面 ,内部一致性α系数为0 6 0~ 0 88,分半信度为 0 5 4~ 0 80 ,重测信度为 0 77~ 0 94...

目的 建立中国 3~ 6岁城市儿童忽视常模 ,并对其信度和效度进行检验。方法 复习文献 ,自行设计调查问卷 ;采用多阶段分层整群随机抽样方法 ,在全国 2 5个城市采样 14 6 5例 ;对样本中的 6 6例间隔 2周重复测查———评价重测信度。调查问卷均由家长或看护人 (和被测查儿童在一起生活 1年以上 )填写 ;采用项目分析、因素分析和信度分析等统计学方法重新建构量表并检验其信度和效度。结果 用统计学方法删除了不适宜题项 ,去除了社会忽视层面 ,排除了 2岁组研究对象 ,最终确定了由 91个题项组成的正式量表 ,它包括身体、情感、教育、安全和医疗等 5个忽视层面 ,分别包含 17、4 0、17,10、7个题项。采用身体、情感、教育、安全和医疗等各忽视层面及总量表得分的第 90百分位数的分值作为划界分 ,分别为 35、80、4 0、2 0、15、190分。总量表的内在信度是 0 94 ,分半信度为0 88,重测信度为 0 92。对于身体、情感、教育、安全和医疗等 5个忽视层面 ,内部一致性α系数为0 6 0~ 0 88,分半信度为 0 5 4~ 0 80 ,重测信度为 0 77~ 0 94 ,P值均小于 0 0 1;其结构效度、表面效度和外部效度也较为满意 ;结论 本常模符合中国国情 ,适用于在 3~ 6岁城市儿童忽视状况的研究中作为一个评价标准 ,而且也?

 
<< 更多相关文摘    
图标索引 相关查询

 


 
CNKI小工具
在英文学术搜索中查有关表面效度的内容
在知识搜索中查有关表面效度的内容
在数字搜索中查有关表面效度的内容
在概念知识元中查有关表面效度的内容
在学术趋势中查有关表面效度的内容
 
 

CNKI主页设CNKI翻译助手为主页 | 收藏CNKI翻译助手 | 广告服务 | 英文学术搜索
版权图标  2008 CNKI-中国知网
京ICP证040431号 互联网出版许可证 新出网证(京)字008号
北京市公安局海淀分局 备案号:110 1081725
版权图标 2008中国知网(cnki) 中国学术期刊(光盘版)电子杂志社