助手标题  
全文文献 工具书 数字 学术定义 翻译助手 学术趋势 更多
查询帮助
意见反馈
   职权进行主义 在 诉讼法与司法制度 分类中 的翻译结果: 查询用时:0.5秒
图标索引 在分类学科中查询
所有学科
诉讼法与司法制度
更多类别查询

图标索引 历史查询
 

职权进行主义
相关语句
  “职权进行主义”译为未确定词的双语例句
    In this part the author expounds the enforcement law’character, i.e. public law, municipal law, compulsory law, general law and procedural law in detail, and also analyzes the guiding ideologies of enforcement law: doctrine of equality of parties & doctrine of inequality of parties, doctrine of application of parties & doctrine of decision of authority, doctrine of priority payment & doctrine of equality payment, doctrine of sealing up repeatable & doctrine of sealingup unrepeatable.
    该部分详细论述了强制执行法的性质,即强制执行法是公法、国内法、强行法、普通法和程序法。 并对强制执行法的指导思想即当事人平等主义与当事人不平等主义、当事人进行主义与职权进行主义、优先清偿主义与平等清偿主义和再查封主义与不再重复查封主义进行了分析。
短句来源
    The reform in pretrial procedure should comform to demands of the value of fairness and efficiency. Doctrine of debate and power must be chosen as the structure of action.
    改革审前准备程序应当以公正和效率为价值取向 ,在诉讼模式的选择上采辩论主义与职权进行主义相结合的模式。
短句来源
    Owing to the difference of history,source background and ideological value, the two main legal genealogies respectively select different modes of right of directing procedure.
    由于历史渊源、产生背景和价值理念上的差异,两大法系各自选择了不同的行政诉讼程序指挥权模式:当事人进行主义和职权进行主义
短句来源
查询“职权进行主义”译词为用户自定义的双语例句

    我想查看译文中含有:的双语例句
例句
没有找到相关例句


The present legislative and judical situation shows that the pretrial procedure of Chinese civil litigation has serious defects.It can not realize the functions of sorting out evidence,fixing issues and impelling compromise.The reform in pretrial procedure should comform to demands of the value of fairness and efficiency.Doctrine of debate and power must be chosen as the structure of action.Uniformity on the reforus must not be imposed without examing individual cases.Different pretrial procedures must be established...

The present legislative and judical situation shows that the pretrial procedure of Chinese civil litigation has serious defects.It can not realize the functions of sorting out evidence,fixing issues and impelling compromise.The reform in pretrial procedure should comform to demands of the value of fairness and efficiency.Doctrine of debate and power must be chosen as the structure of action.Uniformity on the reforus must not be imposed without examing individual cases.Different pretrial procedures must be established for different cases during the procedure of first instance.For simple cases,court in session should be in time after necessary preparations and for complicated ones sufficient preparations are usually needed.

在我国的民事诉讼中 ,虽然也有审前的准备程序 ,但从立法和司法的现状来看 ,该程序存在着严重的功能缺陷 ,起不到证据整理、争点固定和促成和解的功能。改革审前准备程序应当以公正和效率为价值取向 ,在诉讼模式的选择上采辩论主义与职权进行主义相结合的模式。审前准备程序的改革不能搞一刀切 ,在第一审程序中 ,对不同的案件 ,应当设计不同的审前准备程序供法院选择适用 ,对于简单的案件 ,作必要准备后及时开庭 ,对于复杂的案件 ,通常应作充分的审前准备

Owing to the difference of history,source background and ideological value, the two main legal genealogies respectively select different modes of right of directing procedure. The adversary system emphasizes the fairness of administrative action while the ex officio system emphasizes the efficiency. There′s a trend of blend of the two systems because of their mutual supplement. According to the history and reality of our country, we should hold the adversary system as the major mode while the ex officio system...

Owing to the difference of history,source background and ideological value, the two main legal genealogies respectively select different modes of right of directing procedure. The adversary system emphasizes the fairness of administrative action while the ex officio system emphasizes the efficiency. There′s a trend of blend of the two systems because of their mutual supplement. According to the history and reality of our country, we should hold the adversary system as the major mode while the ex officio system as the minor. The mission at present is to absorb the reasonable spirit of the adversary system, that is to arm the parties equally.

由于历史渊源、产生背景和价值理念上的差异,两大法系各自选择了不同的行政诉讼程序指挥权模式:当事人进行主义和职权进行主义。前者强调行政诉讼程序公正,后者侧重于行政诉讼效率,两者存在着互补性,因而当今又出现了融合的趋势。根据我国的历史与现实,我国行政诉讼应选择当事人进行主义为主、职权进行主义为辅的程序指挥权模式,当前的任务则是尽快吸收当事人进行主义的合理内核,即"平等武装"当事人。

 
图标索引 相关查询

 


 
CNKI小工具
在英文学术搜索中查有关职权进行主义的内容
在知识搜索中查有关职权进行主义的内容
在数字搜索中查有关职权进行主义的内容
在概念知识元中查有关职权进行主义的内容
在学术趋势中查有关职权进行主义的内容
 
 

CNKI主页设CNKI翻译助手为主页 | 收藏CNKI翻译助手 | 广告服务 | 英文学术搜索
版权图标  2008 CNKI-中国知网
京ICP证040431号 互联网出版许可证 新出网证(京)字008号
北京市公安局海淀分局 备案号:110 1081725
版权图标 2008中国知网(cnki) 中国学术期刊(光盘版)电子杂志社