助手标题  
全文文献 工具书 数字 学术定义 翻译助手 学术趋势 更多
查询帮助
意见反馈
   普通男生 的翻译结果: 查询用时:0.007秒
图标索引 在分类学科中查询
所有学科
教育理论与教育管理
心理学
更多类别查询

图标索引 历史查询
 

普通男生
相关语句
  common male students
     Comparison study of Personality Characteristic and Parental Rearing Style between Male Gong-du Students and Common Male Students
     工读男生与普通男生人格特征及父母教养方式差异比较
短句来源
     Objective To investigate the difference between male Gong -du students and common male students for their personality characteristic and parental reari ng style and their relationships.
     目的调查工读男生与普通男生人格特征及其父母教养方式的差异,并探究二者的关系。
短句来源
     Results (1)There are significant difference between male Gong-du students and common male students on psychotici sm, introvision and extrovision, neuroticism and lying.
     结果1工读男生在P、E、N和L4种人格特征上,与普通男生之间均存在显著差异。 2工读男生在FF1、MF1、FF3、FF5和FF65种父母教养方式上,与普通男生之间存在显著差异。
短句来源
  “普通男生”译为未确定词的双语例句
     The univariate analysis indicated that there was insignificant difference in the average scores of the factors between female student cadres and female common students, and only the score of obsession-compulsion was significantly different between male student cadres and male common students.
     各组间单变量方差分析显示,女干部与普通女学生在各因素上的得分均无显著差异,男干部与普通男生在各因素上的得分只有强迫因子达到显著性水平;
短句来源
     The average scores of the factors were very close between female student cadres and female common students, but the scores of hostility, anxiety and paranoid ideation were higher in male student cadres than in male common students.
     从各对比组各因子平均分来看,女干部与普通女生的得分非常接近,而男干部在敌对、焦虑、偏执等多项因子得分高于普通男生
短句来源
     Methods Using EPQ to examine subjects person ality characteristic, and using the EMBU questionnaire to investigate the parent al rearing style of subjects.
     方法用艾森克人格问卷(EPQ)考查工读男生与普通男生人格特征的差异,用父母教养方式评价量表(EMBU)考查工读男生与普通男生父母教养方式的差异。
短句来源
     In order to establish the digital standard evaluation of human's static balance and give service to select the static balance in technology difficulty programs in sports,this paper applies to the balance force plate,computer and interrelated software produced by Hefei Institute of Intelligent Machine,Chinese Academy Sciences. We have tested untrained 140 boys and trained 11 boys all aged 8,and we got every subject thirty-six indexes.
     为了建立静态平衡能力的量化评价标准,为技能主导类难度项群静态平衡能力的选材提供量化评价依据,使用中国科学院合肥智能研究所生产的平衡测力台、计算机及配套软件,对140位8岁普通男生和11名8岁武术运动员进行了36项指标的测试。
短句来源
  相似匹配句对
     The Experimental Study in the 1000-meter race of man-students of common university
     普通高校男生1000m跑实验研究
短句来源
     The Teachings Reseanch to Ofeniny Geneval Unilensites's Men's Hardle Classas
     普通高校男生跨栏课的教学法探讨
短句来源
     5 Ordinary athletes.
     (E)普通青少年。
短句来源
     Ordinary girl
     普通女孩
短句来源
     A Boy's Answer
     一个男生的回答
短句来源
查询“普通男生”译词为用户自定义的双语例句

    我想查看译文中含有:的双语例句
例句
没有找到相关例句


AIM: To investigate the mental health status of student cadres in teachers college by means of test.METHODS: In May 2002, 131 student cadres (including cadres of class, college and department) were selected from the departments of politics and history, Chinese, foreign language, mathematics, physics and computer sciences in grade 2000 of original Yiyang Teacher's Training School as the student cadre group, and another 306 common students were selected from 1 class of each department as controls. Their mental...

AIM: To investigate the mental health status of student cadres in teachers college by means of test.METHODS: In May 2002, 131 student cadres (including cadres of class, college and department) were selected from the departments of politics and history, Chinese, foreign language, mathematics, physics and computer sciences in grade 2000 of original Yiyang Teacher's Training School as the student cadre group, and another 306 common students were selected from 1 class of each department as controls. Their mental health status was assessed with symptom checklist-90 (SCL-90), which consisted of 90 items, and were summarized into 9 factors of somatization, obsession-compulsion, interpersonal sensitivity, depression, anxiety, hostility, phobic anxiety, paranoid ideation and psychoticism; the 1-5 scoring system was applied (self-evaluation from no symptom to severe); The evaluation referred to the standard of national norms: the factor score < 1.8 points was taken as normal, 1.8-2.0 points as mild abnormality, 2.1-3.0 points as moderate abnormality, >3.0 points as severe abnormality.RESULTS: All the 131 student cadres and 306 common students were involved in the analysis of results. ① The results of the multivariate analysis between common students and student cadres showed that wilk'sλ=0.96, pillai's trace=0.04, P=0.039, there was significant difference in the multivariate general level. The univariate analysis between the two groups indicated that only the average score of obsession-compulsion was very significantly different (P=0.008). Except phobic anxiety and paranoid ideation, the scores of other factors were al higher in the student cadres than in the common students. ② The results of the multivariate analysis between male and female student cadres showed that wilk's λ=0.865,pillai's trace =0.135, P=0.034, there was significant difference in the multivariate general level. The univariate analysis between the two groups indicated that only the average score of paranoid ideation was significantly different (P=0.008), and the factor of obsession-compulsion was nearly significantly different (P=0.061). The scores of obsession-compulsion, interpersonal sensitivity, hostility, paranoid ideation and psychoticism were all higher in male student cadres than in female ones. ③ The results of the multivariate analysis between student cadres majored in liberal arts and sciences showed that wilk'sλ= 0.924, P=0.358, there was insignificant difference in the multivariate general level. The univariate analysis between the two groups indicated that only the average score of somatization was significantly different (P=0.01). Except obsession-compulsion, the average scores of other factors were all higher in the student cadres majored in liberal arts than in those majored in sciences. ④ The results of multivariate analysis showed that there was insignificant difference in the multivariate general level between female student cadres and female common students, also between male student cadres and male common students. The univariate analysis indicated that there was insignificant difference in the average scores of the factors between female student cadres and female common students, and only the score of obsession-compulsion was significantly different between male student cadres and male common students. The average scores of the factors were very close between female student cadres and female common students, but the scores of hostility, anxiety and paranoid ideation were higher in male student cadres than in male common students. CONCLUSION: The mental health status is worse in student cadres than in common students, and the mental health level of male student cadres is not as good as that of female ones. The psychological guidance should be emphasized in student cadres, especially in the male ones.

目的:应用测试方法评估师范专科学校学生干部的心理健康状况。方法:于2002-05选择原益阳师范专科学校政史系、中文系、外语系、数学系、物理系和计算机系2000级专科班学生干部(包括班干部、校系学生会干部、校系团干部)131人为学生干部组观察对象。并以各系随机抽取1个班的普通同学共306人组成普通学生组作为对照。采用症状自评量表进行学生心理健康状况测评,该量表含90个项目,归纳为躯体化、强迫、人际敏感、抑郁、焦虑、敌对、恐怖、偏执、精神病性等9个因子,采用1~5分(自觉无症状~严重)5级评分制记分。评估参照全国成人常模标准:因子分<1.8分为正常;1.8~2.0分为轻度异常;2.1~3.0分为中度异常;>3.0分为重度异常。结果:学生干部组131人和普通学生组306人均获得症状自评量表结果,全部进入结果分析。①普通学生总体与学生干部之间多变量方差分析结果显示:wilk’s(魏克斯)λ=0.96,pillai’strace(皮耐轨迹)=0.04,P=0.039,两组间多因素整体差异显著。两组间单变量方差分析显示,只有强迫因子均分达到极显著水平(P=0.008)。两组各因子平均分除恐怖、偏执2因子外,其他各因子分均...

目的:应用测试方法评估师范专科学校学生干部的心理健康状况。方法:于2002-05选择原益阳师范专科学校政史系、中文系、外语系、数学系、物理系和计算机系2000级专科班学生干部(包括班干部、校系学生会干部、校系团干部)131人为学生干部组观察对象。并以各系随机抽取1个班的普通同学共306人组成普通学生组作为对照。采用症状自评量表进行学生心理健康状况测评,该量表含90个项目,归纳为躯体化、强迫、人际敏感、抑郁、焦虑、敌对、恐怖、偏执、精神病性等9个因子,采用1~5分(自觉无症状~严重)5级评分制记分。评估参照全国成人常模标准:因子分<1.8分为正常;1.8~2.0分为轻度异常;2.1~3.0分为中度异常;>3.0分为重度异常。结果:学生干部组131人和普通学生组306人均获得症状自评量表结果,全部进入结果分析。①普通学生总体与学生干部之间多变量方差分析结果显示:wilk’s(魏克斯)λ=0.96,pillai’strace(皮耐轨迹)=0.04,P=0.039,两组间多因素整体差异显著。两组间单变量方差分析显示,只有强迫因子均分达到极显著水平(P=0.008)。两组各因子平均分除恐怖、偏执2因子外,其他各因子分均是学生干部得分高于普通学生。②男女干部之间多变量方差分析结果显示,wilk’sλ=0.865,pillai’strace=0.135,P=0.034,两组间多因素整体差异显著。两组间单变量方差分析显示,只有偏执因子上的差异达到显著性水平(P=0.048),强迫因子上的差异接近显著性水平(P=0.061)。男学生干部在强迫、人际敏感、敌对、偏执和精神病性5个因子上得分高于女学生干部。③文理科干部之间多变量方差分析结果显示,wilk’sλ=0.924,P=0.358,两组间多因素整体差异不显著。两组间单变量方差分析显示,只有躯体化因子均分达到显著性差异水平(P=0.01)。从两组各因子平均分来看,除强迫因子外,文科学生干部在其它各因子上得分均高于理科学生干部。④多变量方差分析结果显示,女干部与普通女学生之间,男干部与普通男学生之间多因素整体差异均不显著;各组间单变量方差分析显示,女干部与普通女学生在各因素上的得分均无显著差异,男干部与普通男生在各因素上的得分只有强迫因子达到显著性水平;从各对比组各因子平均分来看,女干部与普通女生的得分非常接近,而男干部在敌对、焦虑、偏执等多项因子得分高于普通男生。结论:学生干部的心理健康状况差于普通学生,男性学生干部的心理健康水平不及女性干部。应重视对学生干部特别是男性学生干部的心理辅导。

Objective To investigate the difference between male Gong -du students and common male students for their personality characteristic and parental reari ng style and their relationships. Methods Using EPQ to examine subjects person ality characteristic, and using the EMBU questionnaire to investigate the parent al rearing style of subjects. Results (1)There are significant difference between male Gong-du students and common male students on psychotici sm, introvision and extrovision, neuroticism and lying. (2)There...

Objective To investigate the difference between male Gong -du students and common male students for their personality characteristic and parental reari ng style and their relationships. Methods Using EPQ to examine subjects person ality characteristic, and using the EMBU questionnaire to investigate the parent al rearing style of subjects. Results (1)There are significant difference between male Gong-du students and common male students on psychotici sm, introvision and extrovision, neuroticism and lying. (2)There are significant difference between male Gong-du students and common male students on parental rearing style of FF1, MF1, FF3, FF5 and FF6. (3)For male Gong-du students, ther e are obvious positive correlations between neuroticism and FF2, FF3, FF5, and o bvious negative correlation between lying and MF3. For common male students, the re are positive correlations between psychoticism and FF2, MF2, MF4, positive co rrelations between neuroticism and FF2, FF5, FF6. Conclusion Gong-du students' pe rsonality development showed impropriety and was associated with improper parent al rearing style.

目的调查工读男生与普通男生人格特征及其父母教养方式的差异,并探究二者的关系。方法用艾森克人格问卷(EPQ)考查工读男生与普通男生人格特征的差异,用父母教养方式评价量表(EMBU)考查工读男生与普通男生父母教养方式的差异。结果1工读男生在P、E、N和L4种人格特征上,与普通男生之间均存在显著差异。2工读男生在FF1、MF1、FF3、FF5和FF65种父母教养方式上,与普通男生之间存在显著差异。3工读男生人格特征的N分与父母教养方式中的FF2、FF3、FF5正相关显著,L分与MF3负相关显著;普通男生人格特征的P分与父母教养方式中的FF2、MF2、MF4正相关显著,N分与FF2、FF5、FF6正相关显著。结论工读生的人格发展具有显著不良倾向;这与其所受不良的父母教养方式有关。

Through the research on the literature materials,the questionnairesand the data statistics,this essay provides the comparative analyses on the aggressive behaviorsof the sports members in the after-school sports teams in middle schools.It is found that the aggressive tendencies in the two sexual groups have certain similarity: male students have higher extrovert aggressive tendency and female students have higher relative aggressive tendency;meanwhile it is found that the male sports members have similar aggressive...

Through the research on the literature materials,the questionnairesand the data statistics,this essay provides the comparative analyses on the aggressive behaviorsof the sports members in the after-school sports teams in middle schools.It is found that the aggressive tendencies in the two sexual groups have certain similarity: male students have higher extrovert aggressive tendency and female students have higher relative aggressive tendency;meanwhile it is found that the male sports members have similar aggressive behaviorswith common male students while the female sports members have the obvious higher aggressive tendency than common female students.So the author provides the following countermeasures:to give the educators the certain recognitions of the aggressive behaviors,toset good examples,toemphasize the resultfeedbacks and to build the nice communication bridge among the peers etc.

通过文献资料调研、问卷调查和数理统计等方法,对中学课余运动队队员和普通学生攻击性行为(包括外显性攻击和关系性攻击)进行了调查和数据的对比分析,发现两个群体男女性别之间攻击性类型趋势相仿:男同学有较高的外显性攻击倾向,女同学表现出较高的关系性攻击倾向。同时还发现:男性训练队成员与普通男生在攻击性上无明显差异,女性训练队成员与普通女生相比有较为明显的外显性攻击。基于此,应提高周围教育者对攻击性行为的认识,树立良好榜样,作好暴力事件的结果反馈以及建立同龄人之间的良性沟通桥梁等。

 
<< 更多相关文摘    
图标索引 相关查询

 


 
CNKI小工具
在英文学术搜索中查有关普通男生的内容
在知识搜索中查有关普通男生的内容
在数字搜索中查有关普通男生的内容
在概念知识元中查有关普通男生的内容
在学术趋势中查有关普通男生的内容
 
 

CNKI主页设CNKI翻译助手为主页 | 收藏CNKI翻译助手 | 广告服务 | 英文学术搜索
版权图标  2008 CNKI-中国知网
京ICP证040431号 互联网出版许可证 新出网证(京)字008号
北京市公安局海淀分局 备案号:110 1081725
版权图标 2008中国知网(cnki) 中国学术期刊(光盘版)电子杂志社