助手标题  
全文文献 工具书 数字 学术定义 翻译助手 学术趋势 更多
查询帮助
意见反馈
   major depression 在 中医学 分类中 的翻译结果: 查询用时:0.171秒
图标索引 在分类学科中查询
所有学科
中医学
精神病学
心理学
药学
内分泌腺及全身性疾病
更多类别查询

图标索引 历史查询
 

major depression
相关语句
  抑郁症
    Systematic studies on the treatment for major depression by electric acupuncture(EA) were performed in the aspect of experimental study and clinical study in this paper.
    本论文从临床研究和实验研究两个方面观察了电针治疗抑郁症的临床疗效并探讨了电针治疗抑郁症的作用机理。
短句来源
    1. Both EA and maprotiline were effective in the treatment of major depression. For endogenous depression maprotiline is better.
    1.电针对抑郁症状的改善与麦普替林相同,电针对焦虑以及抑郁症伴发的躯体症状的改善优于麦普替林,麦普替林对内源性抑郁症的治疗作用优于电针,电针的副作用明显小于麦普替林。
短句来源
    Methods: Clinical study—54 cases with major depression were adopted in this study, 26 cases were in the EA group and 26 cases were in the control group.
    本论文从临床研究和实验研究两个方面观察电针治疗抑郁症的临床疗效,并从电针对慢性应激抑郁模型大鼠行为学、神经内分泌、中枢单胺类神经递质及海马BDNF、c-fos蛋白表达的影响等角度入手,探讨了电针治疗抑郁症的作用机理。
短句来源
  相似匹配句对
    Depression with Interactive Acupuncture
    互动式针刺法治疗抑郁症
短句来源
    1. Both EA and maprotiline were effective in the treatment of major depression. For endogenous depression maprotiline is better.
    1.电针对抑郁症状的改善与麦普替林相同,电针对焦虑以及抑郁症伴发的躯体症状的改善优于麦普替林,麦普替林对内源性抑郁症的治疗作用优于电针,电针的副作用明显小于麦普替林。
短句来源
    Systematic studies on the treatment for major depression by electric acupuncture(EA) were performed in the aspect of experimental study and clinical study in this paper.
    本论文从临床研究和实验研究两个方面观察了电针治疗抑郁症的临床疗效并探讨了电针治疗抑郁症的作用机理。
短句来源
    The Theory of TCM Therapy for Depression
    中医治疗抑郁症理论溯源
短句来源
    Analysis of major and minor sides;
    分析主次;
短句来源
查询“major depression”译词为用户自定义的双语例句

    我想查看译文中含有:的双语例句
例句
为了更好的帮助您理解掌握查询词或其译词在地道英语中的实际用法,我们为您准备了出自英文原文的大量英语例句,供您参考。
  major depression
There are no appreciable differences in social contacts, use of health services or six-month prevalence rates of psychiatric disorders including major depression, alcohol or drug abuse.
      
Fifteen Hmong refugees with major depression were compared with 15 Hmong controls matched for gender, age, marital status, and rural-urban origins from the same population.
      
These findings are assessed in light of the diachronic studies of major depression and of depressive symptoms in the general population.
      
No differences were found in the occurrence of the related factors between persons with dysthymic disorder and persons with major depression.
      
An income level of less than ten thousand dollars was independently associated with a lifetime diagnosis of major depression.
      
更多          


Objective:The aim of the present study was to observation the efficacy and safety on traditional Chinese medicine Shuyusan on treatment depression patients This study will be compared with Paroxetine. Methods:65 patients who met the depression diagnostic criteria of A merican Psychiatric Association 1994 of major depression or bipolar disorder, wi th a total Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) mark ≥17 items and Clinical Global Impressions Severity of Illness scale (CGI S) ≥4 0 were...

Objective:The aim of the present study was to observation the efficacy and safety on traditional Chinese medicine Shuyusan on treatment depression patients This study will be compared with Paroxetine. Methods:65 patients who met the depression diagnostic criteria of A merican Psychiatric Association 1994 of major depression or bipolar disorder, wi th a total Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) mark ≥17 items and Clinical Global Impressions Severity of Illness scale (CGI S) ≥4 0 were entered the s tudy The 33 of total patients were treated with Paroxetine and the other patie nts treated with Shuyusan for 42 days The efficacy was assessed by Hamilton As sess Depression mark, Clinical Global Impressions Severity of Illness scale (CG I S) mark At the same time it access to treat safely by happening rate of sid e effect. Results: There was significant difference in the two g roups, comparison the marks before and after treatment The efficacy rate of Pa roxetine group was 78 78%, the traditional Chinese medicine group was 68 75% Comparison with the efficacy rate between the two groups, there was no signific ant difference The side effect in Paroxetine group was 36 4% and 12 5% in th e traditional Chinese Medicine group Comparison with the happening rate of sid e effect between the two groups, there was significant difference. Concl usion: Shuyusan is efficacious in treatment depression Although Paroxe tine have higher efficacious rate than traditional Chinese medicine Shuyusan, th ere was no significant difference between the two groups But Shuyusan is more safety than Paroxetine in treatment depression

目的 :观察中药舒郁散治疗抑郁症的疗效及安全性 ,并与西药帕罗西汀进行对比研究。方法 :采用美国 1994年心理精神病学会的抑郁症诊断标准 ,对确诊为抑郁症的患者采用汉密尔顿抑郁量表 (HAMD) ,积分≥ 17分 ,临床表现综合评分 (CGI S)≥ 4 0的 6 5例患者纳入临床观察 ,随机分为中药舒郁散治疗组及西药帕罗西汀治疗组进行对比研究 ,观察治疗前后的汉密尔顿抑郁量表 ,临床表现综合评分 (CGI S)的积分变化来评定疗效 ;同时观察两组治疗后患者临床不良反应的发生率 ,以评定两种药物治疗的安全性。结果 :两组治疗前、后的自身积分变化比较差异有显著性意义 ,中医治疗组的有效率为 6 8 75 % ,西医治疗组的有效率为 78 78% ,两组间有效率的比较差异无显著性意义 ,西医治疗组有 36 4 %的患者出现副作用 ,中医治疗组有 12 5 %的患者出现副作用 ,两组间不良反应发生率的比较差异有显著性意义。结论 :舒郁散治疗抑郁症有效 ,虽然帕罗西汀比中药舒郁散治疗抑郁症有效率高 ,两组间统计差异无显著性意义 ,但中药舒郁散比帕罗西汀更安全

AIM:To observe the efficacy and reliability of acupuncture and traditional Chinese medicine shuyusan in treating depression,and the effect and reliability were compared with those of paroxetine. METHODS:Totally 76 patients who met the depression diagnostic criteria of American Psychiatric Association 1994 of major depression or bipolar disorder,and the score of Hamilton Depression Rating Scale(HAMD) ≥17, and the score of Clinical Global Impressions Severity of Illness scale(CGI S) ≥4.0 were divided...

AIM:To observe the efficacy and reliability of acupuncture and traditional Chinese medicine shuyusan in treating depression,and the effect and reliability were compared with those of paroxetine. METHODS:Totally 76 patients who met the depression diagnostic criteria of American Psychiatric Association 1994 of major depression or bipolar disorder,and the score of Hamilton Depression Rating Scale(HAMD) ≥17, and the score of Clinical Global Impressions Severity of Illness scale(CGI S) ≥4.0 were divided into traditional Chinese medicine treatment group(TCM group, n=43,treated with acupuncture and TCM shuyusan) and western medicine treatment group(n=33,treated with paroxetine,paroxetine group).The changes of the scores of HAMD and CGI S,and the incidence rate of clinical adverse reaction after treatment were also observed. RESULTS:The scores of HAMD in the two groups before treatment were 20.4±7.2,21.2±6.8,and after treatment were 9.6±5.8,8.9±6.2(t=7.570 4,7.793 9,P< 0.01).The scores of CGI S in the two groups before treatment were 4.2±0.8,4.4±0.7,and after treatment were 1.9±1.2,1.8±1.4(t=10.335 2,9.685 7,P< 0.05).The effective rate in treating depression was 4.29%(27/42) in the TCM group,not significantly different from that in the paroxetine group(73.53%,25/34)(χ2=0.743 1,P >0.05).Comparing the efficacy rate between two groups,there was no significant difference. The incidence rate of adverse reaction was 38.2£$£¨13/34£(c)in the paroxetine group and 11.9£$£¨5/42£(c)in the TCM group,and there was significant difference(χ2=7.207 1,P< 0.01).CONCLUSION:Acupuncture and traditional Chinese medicine shuyusan have the same curative effect with paroxetine in treating depression with the advantages of more safety and less adverse reaction.

目的:观察针灸及中药舒郁散治疗抑郁症的疗效及安全性,并与西药帕罗西汀进行对比研究。方法:采用美国1994年心理精神病学会抑郁症的诊断标准,将确诊为抑郁症的患者采用汉密顿抑郁量表(Hamiltonratingscalefordepression,HAMD)积分≥17分,临床表现的综合评分(clinicalglobalimpres-sions-severityofillnessscale,CGI-S)≥4.0分的70例患者随机分为中医治疗组43例(采用针灸及中药舒郁散治疗)及西药治疗组35例(口服帕罗西汀治疗),观察治疗前后两组的HAMD,CGI-S的积分变化;同时观察治疗后两组患者临床不良反应的发生率。结果:两组治疗前HAMD评分分别为(20.4±7.2)、(21.2±6.8)、治疗后分别为(9.6±5.8)、(8.9±6.2)。治疗前后自身比较(t=7.5704,7.7939,P<0.01)。两组治疗前CGI-S评分分别为(4.2±0.8)、(4.4±0.7)、治疗后分别为(1.9±1.2)、(1.8±1.4)。治疗前后自身比较(t=10.3352,9.6857,P<0.05)。中医组治疗抑郁症的有效率为4....

目的:观察针灸及中药舒郁散治疗抑郁症的疗效及安全性,并与西药帕罗西汀进行对比研究。方法:采用美国1994年心理精神病学会抑郁症的诊断标准,将确诊为抑郁症的患者采用汉密顿抑郁量表(Hamiltonratingscalefordepression,HAMD)积分≥17分,临床表现的综合评分(clinicalglobalimpres-sions-severityofillnessscale,CGI-S)≥4.0分的70例患者随机分为中医治疗组43例(采用针灸及中药舒郁散治疗)及西药治疗组35例(口服帕罗西汀治疗),观察治疗前后两组的HAMD,CGI-S的积分变化;同时观察治疗后两组患者临床不良反应的发生率。结果:两组治疗前HAMD评分分别为(20.4±7.2)、(21.2±6.8)、治疗后分别为(9.6±5.8)、(8.9±6.2)。治疗前后自身比较(t=7.5704,7.7939,P<0.01)。两组治疗前CGI-S评分分别为(4.2±0.8)、(4.4±0.7)、治疗后分别为(1.9±1.2)、(1.8±1.4)。治疗前后自身比较(t=10.3352,9.6857,P<0.05)。中医组治疗抑郁症的有效率为4.29%(27/42),西医组的有效率为73.53%(25/34),两组有效率比较(χ2=0.7431,P>0.05),西医治疗组38.2%(13/34)的患者出现不良反应,中医治疗组11.9%(5/42)的患者出现不良反应,两组不良反应发生率比较(χ2=7.2071,P<0.01)。结论:针灸及中药舒郁散治疗抑郁症疗效与西药帕罗西汀相同,且更?

 
图标索引 相关查询

 


 
CNKI小工具
在英文学术搜索中查有关major depression的内容
在知识搜索中查有关major depression的内容
在数字搜索中查有关major depression的内容
在概念知识元中查有关major depression的内容
在学术趋势中查有关major depression的内容
 
 

CNKI主页设CNKI翻译助手为主页 | 收藏CNKI翻译助手 | 广告服务 | 英文学术搜索
版权图标  2008 CNKI-中国知网
京ICP证040431号 互联网出版许可证 新出网证(京)字008号
北京市公安局海淀分局 备案号:110 1081725
版权图标 2008中国知网(cnki) 中国学术期刊(光盘版)电子杂志社