助手标题  
全文文献 工具书 数字 学术定义 翻译助手 学术趋势 更多
查询帮助
意见反馈
   intentional explanation 的翻译结果: 查询用时:0.006秒
图标索引 在分类学科中查询
所有学科
自然科学理论与方法
哲学
心理学
更多类别查询

图标索引 历史查询
 

intentional explanation
相关语句
  覆盖律解释
     The Covering-Law Explanation and Intentional Explanation
     覆盖律解释与意向性解释
短句来源
     They are intentional explanation and the covering-law explanation.
     覆盖律解释旨在寻找规律。
短句来源
  相似匹配句对
     The Covering-Law Explanation and Intentional Explanation
     覆盖律解释与意向性解释
短句来源
     They are intentional explanation and the covering-law explanation.
     覆盖律解释旨在寻找规律。
短句来源
     n the Explanation of Contract
     论合同的解释
短句来源
     On the Explanation of the Law
     论法律解释
短句来源
     Intentional Ethics of Phenomenology
     现象学的意向性伦理学
短句来源
查询“intentional explanation”译词为用户自定义的双语例句

    我想查看译文中含有:的双语例句
例句
为了更好的帮助您理解掌握查询词或其译词在地道英语中的实际用法,我们为您准备了出自英文原文的大量英语例句,供您参考。
  intentional explanation
However, I argue that computation is in fact incompatible with this alleged aspect of intentional explanation, and hence the foundational assumptions of orthodox cognitive science are mutually unstable.
      
In earlier publications of the first author it was shown that intentional explanation of actions, functional explanation of biological traits and causal explanation of abnormal events share a common structure.
      
The final section of Chapter 4 sketches an account of intentional explanation.
      
An intentional explanation shows how the agent's beliefs, desires and intentions led her to the choice she had made via a process of deliberation.
      


Elster's methodological individualism is not only a new view but also a new method for studying Marxism, it tries to explain the social phenomena in capitalism from individual standpoint and by rational-choice theory. Besides this, Elster insists that Marxism can be explained by intentional explanation and causal explanation, while he objects to the idea that functional explanation can be applied to Marxism.

埃尔斯特方法论个人主义是研究马克思主义理论的一种新的视角和新的方法,它从个人角度和理性选择原则出发来深入剖析发生在资本主义社会的种种现象。在此基础上,埃尔斯特主张用目的解释、因果解释来诠释马克思的一系列理论成果,同时他也提出反对把功能解释应用到马克思主义理论上。

Two studies investigated children's understanding of aging. Study one was to explore whether children could distinguish living from non-living things in terms of aging and whether they could give non-intentional explanation of it. Study two investigated how children understood the traits of aging, i.e. irreversibility and universality. The results showed that children's performance improved with age. They never used intentional explanation and their understanding of aging was closely related with...

Two studies investigated children's understanding of aging. Study one was to explore whether children could distinguish living from non-living things in terms of aging and whether they could give non-intentional explanation of it. Study two investigated how children understood the traits of aging, i.e. irreversibility and universality. The results showed that children's performance improved with age. They never used intentional explanation and their understanding of aging was closely related with their understanding of growth. It could be concluded that 6-year-old children possess a separate naive theory of biology in terms of aging.

按照“朴素理论”的要素设计研究任务,研究一探查学前儿童能否以衰老这一生命特征为标准做出生物和非生物的本体区分,以及能否对衰老做出生物性而非意图的因果解释;研究二进一步探查学前儿童对生物衰老特性(普遍性和不可逆性)的认知。结果显示, 4、5、6岁学前儿童在分类作业中的认知成绩随年龄逐渐提高,而在因果解释中,各年龄组儿童都不用心理意图作为衰老的原因;他们对衰老的认知与其对生长的认知密不可分;学前儿童对衰老两个特性的认知不同步;由研究结果可以推论, 6岁儿童在衰老维度上具有了较稳定的朴素生物理论。

There are two main models in models of explanations of social sciences.They are intentional explanation and the covering-law explanation.The former looks for teleological factors,and the latter aims to laws.By analyzing the source of above two different models,we want to show that the difference comes from different understanding about the nature of social sciences and that the possibility of eliminating the difference between the two models depends on breaking through the view of science of logical...

There are two main models in models of explanations of social sciences.They are intentional explanation and the covering-law explanation.The former looks for teleological factors,and the latter aims to laws.By analyzing the source of above two different models,we want to show that the difference comes from different understanding about the nature of social sciences and that the possibility of eliminating the difference between the two models depends on breaking through the view of science of logical empiricism.

在社会科学的解释模型中,意向性解释诉诸人的信念、期望等目的性因素;覆盖律解释旨在寻找规律。本文通过辨析这两种不同主张的根源,试图说明意向性解释与覆盖律解释的不同源于对社会科学本质的不同理解,以逻辑经验主义的科学观为平台使得覆盖律解释的努力失败,弥合意向性解释和覆盖律解释的分歧的可能性来自于突破逻辑经验主义的局限,重新看待社会科学的本质。

 
图标索引 相关查询

 


 
CNKI小工具
在英文学术搜索中查有关intentional explanation的内容
在知识搜索中查有关intentional explanation的内容
在数字搜索中查有关intentional explanation的内容
在概念知识元中查有关intentional explanation的内容
在学术趋势中查有关intentional explanation的内容
 
 

CNKI主页设CNKI翻译助手为主页 | 收藏CNKI翻译助手 | 广告服务 | 英文学术搜索
版权图标  2008 CNKI-中国知网
京ICP证040431号 互联网出版许可证 新出网证(京)字008号
北京市公安局海淀分局 备案号:110 1081725
版权图标 2008中国知网(cnki) 中国学术期刊(光盘版)电子杂志社