By accomplishing individual value, serving society politics and purifying social fashion, Wen Xin Diao Long discusses the aim of literary education. Wen Xin Diao Long inherits and develops the literature moral education of traditional Confucianism, and forms it's own literature moral educational thought.
The poet' s romantic chacter and his gifted talent of writing were the objective conditions of the creation. while, the contradition between these and the traditional moral and ideal were the direct reasons for the creation.
Starting from the talent-training principle of "Broaden Eyesight, Consolidate Foundation" and combined with the features of literature discipline, this article has discussed how to stick to student-centered approach, cultivate students′ humanistic qualities, practical skills and initiatives and promote students′ethical and moral standards so as to form the new train of thoughts on teaching characteristic of the spirit of the times and with good sense of taste.
Surveying the whole indited process from the view of the impact of various factors on people that involved the impact of political movement and policy, the impact of social power, including historical changes, traditional concepts, national moral human weakness and custom, we can discover that his novel indited also experienced a changed and developed process that is from outside to inside and from simple to deep.
Zhu Xi (朱熹) criticized certain men of letters Such as Yang Xing (扬雄) and Hong Chu (洪刍 ) as low moral quality while praised many writers such as Qu Yuan (屈原 ), Tao Yuanming (陶渊明), Du Fu (杜甫), and Han Yu (韩愈) with their excellent character.
At the same time, the two shares were jumbled and cracked on the figures' status and moral character, the social scene displayed and the sorrow that the author tried to lodge at. The inconsistent was also the basic feature of the content and substance of Ferocious Person, and it influenced the value on the novel.
The processional motive was formed using the method of moral and material stimulation of a successful activity.
By using this alternative model of ethics, the author exposes the frailties of cultural stereotypes in both the East and the West, arguing that the moral efforts of all nations should be appreciated.
The reason that people do not often see this fact comes mainly from their preoccupations with different moral horizons.
The dialogue between different moral horizons and hence different cultures will help each side to develop a more adequate value system which can better solve problems decisive for the coexistence in global context.
Higher education leads to a more positive evaluation of GM (genetically modified) foods and applications of biotechnology with respect to usefulness, moral acceptability, and suitability for encouragement.