助手标题  
全文文献 工具书 数字 学术定义 翻译助手 学术趋势 更多
查询帮助
意见反馈
   legal explanation 在 国际法 分类中 的翻译结果: 查询用时:0.076秒
图标索引 在分类学科中查询
所有学科
国际法
法理、法史
民商法
刑法
行政法及地方法制
诉讼法与司法制度
宪法
船舶工业
体育
更多类别查询

图标索引 历史查询
 

legal explanation
相关语句
  法律解释
    This viewpoint is the result of misunderstanding of“Memorandum of Understanding of the Stipulations and dispute settlement procedures”and related practices. In order to solve legal applicability of it, we need to classify three concepts of experts in WTO, that is,“jurisdiction”,“legal applicability”and“legal explanation”.
    这一观点在某种程度上是对WTO《关于争端解决的规则与程序谅解书》及有关WTO争端解决实践的误读,为确定WTO争端解决机制所适用的法律,就需要对WTO专家组的“管辖权”、“法律适用”以及“法律解释”这三个概念进行必要的区分。
短句来源
    Because there are no unified legal explanation or usage at present, the understanding of article of 39 (1 ) and the application are various in practice.
    由于目前没有统一的、有拘束力的法律解释或惯例,实践中对39条(1)款的理解和运用千差万别。
短句来源
    In order to solve legal applicability of it,we need to classify three concepts of experts in WTO,that is,“jurisdiction”,“legal applicability”,and“legal explanation”.
    为确定WTO争端解决机制所适用的法律,就需要对WTO专家组的“管辖权”、“法律适用”以及“法律解释”这三个概念进行必要的区分。
短句来源
  法律解释
    This viewpoint is the result of misunderstanding of“Memorandum of Understanding of the Stipulations and dispute settlement procedures”and related practices. In order to solve legal applicability of it, we need to classify three concepts of experts in WTO, that is,“jurisdiction”,“legal applicability”and“legal explanation”.
    这一观点在某种程度上是对WTO《关于争端解决的规则与程序谅解书》及有关WTO争端解决实践的误读,为确定WTO争端解决机制所适用的法律,就需要对WTO专家组的“管辖权”、“法律适用”以及“法律解释”这三个概念进行必要的区分。
短句来源
    Because there are no unified legal explanation or usage at present, the understanding of article of 39 (1 ) and the application are various in practice.
    由于目前没有统一的、有拘束力的法律解释或惯例,实践中对39条(1)款的理解和运用千差万别。
短句来源
    In order to solve legal applicability of it,we need to classify three concepts of experts in WTO,that is,“jurisdiction”,“legal applicability”,and“legal explanation”.
    为确定WTO争端解决机制所适用的法律,就需要对WTO专家组的“管辖权”、“法律适用”以及“法律解释”这三个概念进行必要的区分。
短句来源
  法律解释
    This viewpoint is the result of misunderstanding of“Memorandum of Understanding of the Stipulations and dispute settlement procedures”and related practices. In order to solve legal applicability of it, we need to classify three concepts of experts in WTO, that is,“jurisdiction”,“legal applicability”and“legal explanation”.
    这一观点在某种程度上是对WTO《关于争端解决的规则与程序谅解书》及有关WTO争端解决实践的误读,为确定WTO争端解决机制所适用的法律,就需要对WTO专家组的“管辖权”、“法律适用”以及“法律解释”这三个概念进行必要的区分。
短句来源
    Because there are no unified legal explanation or usage at present, the understanding of article of 39 (1 ) and the application are various in practice.
    由于目前没有统一的、有拘束力的法律解释或惯例,实践中对39条(1)款的理解和运用千差万别。
短句来源
    In order to solve legal applicability of it,we need to classify three concepts of experts in WTO,that is,“jurisdiction”,“legal applicability”,and“legal explanation”.
    为确定WTO争端解决机制所适用的法律,就需要对WTO专家组的“管辖权”、“法律适用”以及“法律解释”这三个概念进行必要的区分。
短句来源
  “legal explanation”译为未确定词的双语例句
    Although this tendency has existed for many years, there are little breakthrough in the corresponding legal explanation and compilation because of the limitations of traditional legal norms and think modes in international law circles.
    但是 ,由于国际法学界在相当长的时期内囿于传统的法律模式和思维方法 ,对这一问题的法律阐释和编纂始终没有取得突破性进展。
短句来源
查询“legal explanation”译词为用户自定义的双语例句

    我想查看译文中含有:的双语例句
例句
为了更好的帮助您理解掌握查询词或其译词在地道英语中的实际用法,我们为您准备了出自英文原文的大量英语例句,供您参考。
  legal explanation
With prior conviction evidence but not hearsay the legal explanation "backfired." In addition, the critical witness' credibility did not affect subjects' ability to disregard inadmissible evidence.
      
Inducing jurors to disregard inadmissible evidence: A legal explanation does not help
      
We will consequently examine this legal explanation and show its limits, in general as well as more specifically in the Russian case.
      


The infeasibility of investigating state's liability on the problem of international environmental damage has resulted in a more and more obvious tendency towards private law in the liability system of such damage. Although this tendency has existed for many years, there are little breakthrough in the corresponding legal explanation and compilation because of the limitations of traditional legal norms and think modes in international law circles. Recently, the report of International Law Association...

The infeasibility of investigating state's liability on the problem of international environmental damage has resulted in a more and more obvious tendency towards private law in the liability system of such damage. Although this tendency has existed for many years, there are little breakthrough in the corresponding legal explanation and compilation because of the limitations of traditional legal norms and think modes in international law circles. Recently, the report of International Law Association brought out this problem. This article systematically analyzes the contents and legal methods of the privatization of international environmental damage liability.

在国际环境损害问题上追究国家责任的不可行性 ,使国际环境损害责任制度呈现出越来越明显的私法化趋势已多年。但是 ,由于国际法学界在相当长的时期内囿于传统的法律模式和思维方法 ,对这一问题的法律阐释和编纂始终没有取得突破性进展。直到最近 ,联合国国际法委员会的报告才突破了这一问题。从理论上对国际环境损害责任私法化的内容和法学方法论问题进行系统的分析、探讨 ,对发展国际环境法具有重要意义。

The range of legal applicability in the system of WTO's dispute settlement has been a controversial problem existed in international legal circles. The general saying in domestic legal circle is that the law used by experts and courts is only applied in agreements of WTO, the general international public law could not be used as the legal origin of the system of settling disputes, but as“explanatory origin”. This viewpoint is the result of misunderstanding of“Memorandum of Understanding of the Stipulations...

The range of legal applicability in the system of WTO's dispute settlement has been a controversial problem existed in international legal circles. The general saying in domestic legal circle is that the law used by experts and courts is only applied in agreements of WTO, the general international public law could not be used as the legal origin of the system of settling disputes, but as“explanatory origin”. This viewpoint is the result of misunderstanding of“Memorandum of Understanding of the Stipulations and dispute settlement procedures”and related practices. In order to solve legal applicability of it, we need to classify three concepts of experts in WTO, that is,“jurisdiction”,“legal applicability”and“legal explanation”.

WTO争端解决机制中适用法律的范围,一直是国际法学界存在争议的问题。国内学术界的“通说”似乎是,专家组和上诉机构在审理案件时所适用的法律仅限于WTO协议的有关规定,一般国际公法并不能作为WTO争端解决机制所适用的法律渊源,而仅能作为“解释性渊源”。这一观点在某种程度上是对WTO《关于争端解决的规则与程序谅解书》及有关WTO争端解决实践的误读,为确定WTO争端解决机制所适用的法律,就需要对WTO专家组的“管辖权”、“法律适用”以及“法律解释”这三个概念进行必要的区分。

The range of legal applicability in the system of settling disputes in WTO's Dispute Settlement has been a controversial problem existed in international legal circles.The general saying in domestic legal circle is that the law used by experts anti courts is only applied in agreement of WTO,the general international public law could not be used as the legal origin of the system of settling disputes,but as“explanatory origin”. This viewpoint is the result of misunderstanding of“Memorandum of Understanding of...

The range of legal applicability in the system of settling disputes in WTO's Dispute Settlement has been a controversial problem existed in international legal circles.The general saying in domestic legal circle is that the law used by experts anti courts is only applied in agreement of WTO,the general international public law could not be used as the legal origin of the system of settling disputes,but as“explanatory origin”. This viewpoint is the result of misunderstanding of“Memorandum of Understanding of the Stipulations and dispute settlement procedures”and related practices.In order to solve legal applicability of it,we need to classify three concepts of experts in WTO,that is,“jurisdiction”,“legal applicability”,and“legal explanation”.

WTO争端解决机制中适用法律的范围,一直是国际法学界存在争议的问题。国内学术界的“通说”似乎是,专家组和上诉机构在审理案件时所适用的法律仅限于WTO协议的有关规定,一般国际公法并不能作为WTO争端解决机制所适用的法律渊源,而仅能作为“解释性渊源”。这一观点在某种程度上是对WTO《关于争端解决的规则与程序谅解书》及有关WTO争端解决实践的误读。为确定WTO争端解决机制所适用的法律,就需要对WTO专家组的“管辖权”、“法律适用”以及“法律解释”这三个概念进行必要的区分。

 
图标索引 相关查询

 


 
CNKI小工具
在英文学术搜索中查有关legal explanation的内容
在知识搜索中查有关legal explanation的内容
在数字搜索中查有关legal explanation的内容
在概念知识元中查有关legal explanation的内容
在学术趋势中查有关legal explanation的内容
 
 

CNKI主页设CNKI翻译助手为主页 | 收藏CNKI翻译助手 | 广告服务 | 英文学术搜索
版权图标  2008 CNKI-中国知网
京ICP证040431号 互联网出版许可证 新出网证(京)字008号
北京市公安局海淀分局 备案号:110 1081725
版权图标 2008中国知网(cnki) 中国学术期刊(光盘版)电子杂志社