|
After Chinese Criminal Procedural Law was revised in 1996, great changes have taken place in the political economic life of China. The revision of Chinese Constitution in 2004 and the entry of articles of human rights into the Constitution have become the direct impetus for the revision of Chinese Criminal Procedural Law. However, four macroscopic issues need considering if a lasting criminal procedural code is to be worked out. Firstly, the logical starting point of the revision... After Chinese Criminal Procedural Law was revised in 1996, great changes have taken place in the political economic life of China. The revision of Chinese Constitution in 2004 and the entry of articles of human rights into the Constitution have become the direct impetus for the revision of Chinese Criminal Procedural Law. However, four macroscopic issues need considering if a lasting criminal procedural code is to be worked out. Firstly, the logical starting point of the revision of criminal procedural law should be the one that transcends ex-officio litigation system. Secondly, the revision of criminal procedural law should be orientated to the realization of procedural justice. Thirdly, the path of the revision should be one that links constructive rationalism with empiricist rationalism. Fourthly, the transplantation of innovative system should be chosen. 自1996年刑事诉讼法修订以来,我国的政治经济生活发生了较大变化。2004年宪法修改以及人权保障条款的"入宪",更是成为推动我国刑事诉讼法修改的直接动力。然而,要制订一部垂范久远的刑事诉讼法典,需要把握以下几个宏观问题:第一,刑事诉讼法再修改的逻辑起点应当是超职权主义诉讼制度;第二,刑事诉讼法再修改的目标定位应当是实现程序正义;第三,刑事诉讼法再修改的路径选择应当沟通建构理性主义与经验理性主义;第四,刑事诉讼法再修改应当选择创新型制度移植的道路。
|