助手标题  
全文文献 工具书 数字 学术定义 翻译助手 学术趋势 更多
查询帮助
意见反馈
   everything 在 哲学 分类中 的翻译结果: 查询用时:0.008秒
图标索引 在分类学科中查询
所有学科
哲学
世界文学
中国文学
宗教
中国共产党
文艺理论
马克思主义
中国近现代史
美学
更多类别查询

图标索引 历史查询
 

everything
相关语句
没有找到相关双语例句
例句
为了更好的帮助您理解掌握查询词或其译词在地道英语中的实际用法,我们为您准备了出自英文原文的大量英语例句,供您参考。
  everything
A commonly accepted way of construction of hierarchical systems is to combine shared-memory (shared-everything) clusters in a unique system without shared resources.
      
Everything aforementioned substantially affects the possibility of using nitrates as the corrosion inhibitors of stainless steel in acidic media.
      
The modern paradigm assumes that the fundamental theory of everything is some form of string theory living in space of more than four dimensions.
      
Abundant and diverse fossils occurring in the succession evidence that volcanism responsible for origin of the plateau basalt province in Siberia was not a brief epoch of paroxysmal eruptions, which eliminated everything alive.
      
The central act of the new era is to connect everything to everything in deep web networks at many levels of mutually interdependent relations, where resources and activities are shared, markets are enlarged and costs and risk are reduced.
      
更多          


Lu Xun and Hu Shi are two prominent figures in the modern cultural history of China. However, the past appraisement of them has been suffeting from being confined to their divergency in political standpoint. This essay is an effort to achieve an objective analysis and comparison of the two with respect to the cultural factors and academic concepts on the basis of the entire cultural environment. The author holds the view that Lu Xun and Hu Shi did not digress from the general orientation of science and democracy...

Lu Xun and Hu Shi are two prominent figures in the modern cultural history of China. However, the past appraisement of them has been suffeting from being confined to their divergency in political standpoint. This essay is an effort to achieve an objective analysis and comparison of the two with respect to the cultural factors and academic concepts on the basis of the entire cultural environment. The author holds the view that Lu Xun and Hu Shi did not digress from the general orientation of science and democracy in China inspire of their different ideological and political stands. Though they did not agree to each other in their under standing of patriotism and humanitarianism, the two represent a general red thread running through their ideological systems. Hu Shi's wrong po litical stand has cast a shadow on his ideological system. Nonetheless, taking everything into consideration and viewed in the whole context of the modern history of culture and ideology in China, we have to admit that his achievement still outweighs his errors.

鲁迅和胡适是中国现代文化史上的两位知名人物。过去对他们的评价较多地拘泥于其政治立场的差异。本文力图客观地以整体的文化环境为背景,从文化因素和学术思想方面分析比较鲁迅和胡适的思想。作者认为,鲁迅和胡适虽有不同的思想轨迹和政治立场,但都没有偏离现代中国的以科学和民主为旗帜的大方向;尽管他们对爱国主义和人道主义的理解不尽相同,但二者都是贯穿他们思想的红线;胡适错误的政治立场给他的学术思想蒙上阴影,但在中国现代文化思想史上,他仍然是功大于过的人物。

here are no two things in the world that are identical.However,different things cancommunicate with each other;Those who hold the view that lareguages can only be possessedprivately but do not communicate with each other fail to understand this point.The key for different things to communicate is as follows:everyone or everything in theworld is the reflection of the whole universe. the difference lies only in their different forms ofreflection. The reason that all things are communicable also fits,in to...

here are no two things in the world that are identical.However,different things cancommunicate with each other;Those who hold the view that lareguages can only be possessedprivately but do not communicate with each other fail to understand this point.The key for different things to communicate is as follows:everyone or everything in theworld is the reflection of the whole universe. the difference lies only in their different forms ofreflection. The reason that all things are communicable also fits,in to the relationship between past andfuture. The whole universe hears the past.and also breeds the future. Both the pastand the futureare the different stages and status of the self-unfolding and self-development of the wholeuniverse. Although the past and the future are not the same,they can communicate with eachother. The past and the present of history is also a continuous organic whole. The highest objective of philosophy should not be restricted to the realization of sameness oridentity. Instead,it should enter the whole of the universe to appreciate the lofty horizon of all-communicativeness in an organic whole.

世界上没有完全相同的东西,但不同的东西可以彼此相通。主张语言只能私有而不能相互交流的论者就是不懂得这个道理。不同而又能互相沟通的关键在于:每一人、每一物都是唯一的宇宙整体的反映,只是各自的反映形式不同而已。万有相通的道理也适用于过去与未来的关系。宇宙整体既承载着过去,也孕育着未来。过去与未来都是唯一的宇宙整体自我展开、自我发展的不同阶段和状态。所以过去与未来虽不相同而又能相通。历史的昨天和今天也是一个有连续性的统一整体。哲学的最高任务不能停滞于认识相同性或同一性,而是要进而从宇宙整体内部体验到万有相通、万物一体的高超境界。

In order to properly understand and grasp the essence and basic feature of negation of negation law, three questions must be answered, namely, how to understand the movement of “self development” and “self perfection”? how to comprehend the developmental model of “three stages” and “two negations”? what is the position of negation of negation law in dialectics? This article emphasizes that everything goes forward by “self movement”, “self development” and “self perfection”, that the essence and basic...

In order to properly understand and grasp the essence and basic feature of negation of negation law, three questions must be answered, namely, how to understand the movement of “self development” and “self perfection”? how to comprehend the developmental model of “three stages” and “two negations”? what is the position of negation of negation law in dialectics? This article emphasizes that everything goes forward by “self movement”, “self development” and “self perfection”, that the essence and basic feature of negation of negation law is the unity of progress and setback, and that negation of negation law is not only a fundamental law but also a general law of the highest level in dialectics.

要正确认识和把握否定之否定规律的实质和特征,必须正确回答三个问题,即:如何理解“自身发展”、“自我完善”的运动?如何看待“三个阶段、两次否定”的发展模式?否定之否定规律在辩证法中处于何种地位?我们认为,任何事物都是“自己运动”、“自身发展”和“自我完善”的;前进性和曲折性的统一是否定之否定规律的实质内容和基本特征;否定之否定规律不仅是辩证法的一大基本规律,而且是辩证法中处于最高层次的总体性的规律

 
<< 更多相关文摘    
图标索引 相关查询

 


 
CNKI小工具
在英文学术搜索中查有关everything的内容
在知识搜索中查有关everything的内容
在数字搜索中查有关everything的内容
在概念知识元中查有关everything的内容
在学术趋势中查有关everything的内容
 
 

CNKI主页设CNKI翻译助手为主页 | 收藏CNKI翻译助手 | 广告服务 | 英文学术搜索
版权图标  2008 CNKI-中国知网
京ICP证040431号 互联网出版许可证 新出网证(京)字008号
北京市公安局海淀分局 备案号:110 1081725
版权图标 2008中国知网(cnki) 中国学术期刊(光盘版)电子杂志社