The INDO series methods are used to study the two structures of C_(60)CH_2:one is of C_2v geometry with a bridging CH_2 across the bond between two fused six-membered rings in C_60;

The clinical effective rates,symptoms amelioration rates,and the changes of urinary albumin excretion rate(UAER),urinary β_2-microglobulin ( Uβ_2-MG),serum creatinine(Scr),total cholesterol(TC),triglyceride(TG) and hemodynamic parameters were compared between two groups.

The indexes of total prostate volume (PV), the transitional zone volume of prostate (TZV), the indexof transitional zone (TZI), PSA, F-PSA and F/T-PSA between two groups were compared.

According to the fasting glucose (FPG) and the hemoglobin A_1C level (HbA_1C%),the DM group were divided into two subgroup: DM_1 ( n =35),DM_2 ( n =26) and compared the numbers of segments of Ve/Va<1 between two groups.

Intervertebral discs at L3/L4,L4/L5,L5/S1 were scanned with computerized tomography,comparing herniated discs,sagittal diameter of vertebral canal,height of lateral recess,vertebral hyperostosis,ligament hypertrophy and calcification between two groups.

Results Symptoms were significantly improved in both g roups(87.3%,94.8%,respectively) excepting syptom of pain relief,but there was no significant difference between two groups(P >0.05).

The clinical effective rate had significant differences between two groups (χ~2=3.94, P<0.05), however the side effects had no significant differences between two groups (χ~2=0.20, P>0.05).

The level of insulin, C peptide and resistin decreased, while insulin sensitivity index and adiponectin increased significantly in both groups (P<0.01), but there was no significant difference between two groups (P>0.05).

Results showed that there was no statistical significant difference between two groups, but in alleviating the pain, SPLX is significantly better than the control group, ( P <0.05).

After 2 month treatment,in treatment group such immune indexes as CD 3,CD 4,CD 8 and NK cell increased at different degrees and there were great differences[WT6BX](P<0.05～0.01)[WT6BZ] in comparison with control group; but in patients with late tumor,there were no differences in survival time and toxic and negative effects between two groups.

The liquid crystal director distribution in LCoS is simply calculated, and the picture of LC director structure between two adjacent display pixels inside the cell is given. The spacing grid is 50×50×20, the solving time is 564.36 s by the computer of Pentium 4, 2.8 GHz.

Extending this theory, we show how to use correlations between two processes to predict one from the other.

Extending this theory, we show how to use correlations between two processes to predict one from the other.

It introduces notions of localization and approximation between two frames ${\frak F} = \{f_i\}_{i\in I}$ and ${\frak E} = \{e_j\}_{j\in G}$ ($G$ a discrete

The maximum number of intersections between two plane rectangular paths

We show that the maximum number of intersections between two plane rectangular paths with lengthsm andn, 2≤m≤n, is 4n+2, ifm=4 andn≡1(mod 3); and it ismn+1 otherwise.

In this paper the writer employs complex Riemannian Geometry and defines the absolute interval between two points as consisting of a real part and an imaginary part. Two postulates (I) and (II) are used: the first may be called law of gravitation and electro-magnetism; the second equation of motion. In the absence of electromagnetic phenomena the theory reduces practically to Einstein's theory.

This paper is a supplement to the author's previous paper "The Constants and Analysis of Rigid Frames", published in the first issue of the Journal. Its purpose is to amplify as well as to improve the method of propagating joint rotations developed, separately and independently, by Dr. Klouěek and Prof. Meng, so that the formulas are applicable to rigid frames with non-prismatic bars and of closed type. The method employs joint propagation factor between two adjacent joints as the basic frame constant...

This paper is a supplement to the author's previous paper "The Constants and Analysis of Rigid Frames", published in the first issue of the Journal. Its purpose is to amplify as well as to improve the method of propagating joint rotations developed, separately and independently, by Dr. Klouěek and Prof. Meng, so that the formulas are applicable to rigid frames with non-prismatic bars and of closed type. The method employs joint propagation factor between two adjacent joints as the basic frame constant and the sum of modified stiffness of all the bar-ends at a joint as the auxiliary frame constant. The basic frame constants at the left of right ends of all the bars are computed by the consecutive applications of a single formula in a chain manner. The auxiliary frame constant at any joint where it is needed is computed from the basic frame constants at the two ends of any bar connected to the joint, so that its value may be easily checked by computing it from two or more bars connected to the same joint.Although the principle of this method was developed by Dr. Klouěek and Prof. Meng, the formulas presented in this paper for computing the basic and auxiliary frame constants, besides being believed to be original and by no means the mere amplification of those presented by the two predecessors, are of much improved form and more convenient to apply.By the author's formula, the basic frame constants in closed frames of comparatively simple form may be computed in a straight-forward manner without much difficulties, and this is not the case with any other similar methods except Dr. Klouěek's.The case of sidesway is treated as usual by balancing the shears at the tops of all the columns, but special formulas are deduced for comput- ing those column shears directly from joint rotations and sidesway angle without pre-computing the moments at the two ends of all the columns.In the method of propagating unbalanced moments proposed by Mr. Koo I-Ying and improved by the author, the unbalanced moments at all the bar-ends of each joint are first propagated to the bar-ends of all the other joints to obtain the total unbalanced moments at all the bar-ends, and then are distributed at each joint only once to arrive at the balanced moments at all the bar-ends of that joint. Thus the principle of propagating joint rotations with indirect computation of the bar-end moments is ingeneously applied to propagate unbalanced moments with direct computation of the bar-end moments, and, at the same time, without the inconvenient use of two different moment distribution factors as necessary in all the onecycle methods of moment distribution. The basic frame constant employed in this method is the same as that in the method of propagating joint rotations, so that its nearest approximate value at any bar end may be computed at once by the formula deduced by the author. Evidently, this method combines all the main advantages of the methods proposed by Profs.T. Y. Lin and Meng Chao-Li and Dr. Klouěek, and is undoubtedly the most superior one-cycle method of moment distribution yet proposed as far as the author knows.Typical numerical examples are worked out in details to illustrate the applications of the two methods.