助手标题  
全文文献 工具书 数字 学术定义 翻译助手 学术趋势 更多
查询帮助
意见反馈
   new cultural history 的翻译结果: 查询用时:0.203秒
图标索引 在分类学科中查询
所有学科
史学理论
世界历史
文化
更多类别查询

图标索引 历史查询
 

new cultural history
相关语句
  新文化史
     Micro-history and New Cultural History
     微观史学与新文化史
短句来源
     This article examines the problem of coherence in historical thinking and writing from the so-called Annales school in France in the 1930s to the “new cultural history” that emerged in the 1980s in the United States.
     本文考察的是从20世纪30年代产生的所谓年鉴学派到80年代产生于美国的“新文化史”之间的历史思维与历史编撰中的一致性问题。 直到20世纪早期,史学界一直假定历史研究很快会产生出统一的人类历史。
短句来源
     The shaping of New Cultural History has three main sources in the theoretical and methodological aspects, that is, British New Marxist history and French Annale history school, Post-Modernist cultural criticism and Historical Narratism, and Cultural Anthropology.
     新文化史在形成过程中 ,主要吸收了三个方面的理论和方法———英国马克思主义史学和法国年鉴派史学、后现代文化批评和历史叙述主义、文化人类学。
短句来源
     These three sources determined and affected the basic form and direction of New Cultural History.
     这三个方面的共同作用 ,决定和影响了当今新文化史研究的基本形式与走向。
短句来源
     The promoters of the “new cultural history” abandoned the project of total history and instead proposed that historians should unite around one or another “paradigm” of historical research.
     “新文化史”的推崇者放弃了总体历史的计划,并提出历史学家应当统一在这样那样的史学研究的“范式”之中。
短句来源
更多       
  新文化史学
     The Rise of New Cultural History
     新文化史学的兴起——与剑桥大学彼得伯克教授座谈侧记
短句来源
查询“new cultural history”译词为用户自定义的双语例句

    我想查看译文中含有:的双语例句
例句
为了更好的帮助您理解掌握查询词或其译词在地道英语中的实际用法,我们为您准备了出自英文原文的大量英语例句,供您参考。
  new cultural history
Microhistories modeled on Clifford Geertz's anthropological notion of thick description became the foundation for the new cultural history.
      


In the review Professor Patrick Joyce, as a well known Britain post-modern historian, describes the recent changes and new trend of history study in Britain and the West, generalizes the new social history, new cultural history, post-modernism and history. Then he analyses the concepts of “modernity” ,“post-modernity” and their relations with historical studies, and points out that some concepts of historical studies have been gradually replaced by those new concepts. In the end of this article,...

In the review Professor Patrick Joyce, as a well known Britain post-modern historian, describes the recent changes and new trend of history study in Britain and the West, generalizes the new social history, new cultural history, post-modernism and history. Then he analyses the concepts of “modernity” ,“post-modernity” and their relations with historical studies, and points out that some concepts of historical studies have been gradually replaced by those new concepts. In the end of this article, Professor Joyce prospects the future of this trend.

在后现代主义的理论支撑下 ,西方历史学正在重建自己的新概念 ;转换其研究视角 ;运用新的研究方法 ;开拓出一些全新的研究领域。乔伊斯教授从一位历史学家的视野为我们介绍了这些变化 ,重点阐释了“现代性”和“后现代性”等概念与历史学研究之间的内在关联以及新文化史的一些基本特征

New Cultural History, which has been developed since the late 1970s and early 1980s, is a main trend in the present Western historiography. It replaced Economic-Social History as the main steam in the history study and writing. The shaping of New Cultural History has three main sources in the theoretical and methodological aspects, that is, British New Marxist history and French Annale history school, Post-Modernist cultural criticism and Historical Narratism,...

New Cultural History, which has been developed since the late 1970s and early 1980s, is a main trend in the present Western historiography. It replaced Economic-Social History as the main steam in the history study and writing. The shaping of New Cultural History has three main sources in the theoretical and methodological aspects, that is, British New Marxist history and French Annale history school, Post-Modernist cultural criticism and Historical Narratism, and Cultural Anthropology. These three sources determined and affected the basic form and direction of New Cultural History.

新文化史是 2 0世纪七八十年代以来当代西方史学理论和历史编纂中一个最主要的发展趋势 ,它取代了经济—社会史而成为历史研究的主流。新文化史在形成过程中 ,主要吸收了三个方面的理论和方法———英国马克思主义史学和法国年鉴派史学、后现代文化批评和历史叙述主义、文化人类学。这三个方面的共同作用 ,决定和影响了当今新文化史研究的基本形式与走向。

This article examines the problem of coherence in historical thinking and writing from the so-called Annales school in France in the 1930s to the “new cultural history” that emerged in the 1980s in the United States. Until the early 20th century, it was often assumed that historical research would soon generate a unified history of humanity. But coherence proved harder to achieve than such historians as Lord Acton and J.B. Bury hoped. The Annales school historians Lucien Febvre and Fernand Braudel...

This article examines the problem of coherence in historical thinking and writing from the so-called Annales school in France in the 1930s to the “new cultural history” that emerged in the 1980s in the United States. Until the early 20th century, it was often assumed that historical research would soon generate a unified history of humanity. But coherence proved harder to achieve than such historians as Lord Acton and J.B. Bury hoped. The Annales school historians Lucien Febvre and Fernand Braudel proposed a “total history” aiming at the comprehensive description of specific historical realities, such as the Mediterranean in the age of Philip II, but the attempt to write “total” history tended, ironically, to generate incoherence. The promoters of the “new cultural history” abandoned the project of total history and instead proposed that historians should unite around one or another “paradigm” of historical research. The most sophisticated of these historians (e.g., Lynn Hunt) acknowledge that the choice of paradigm is fundamentally arbitrary. The present article questions whether the imposed coherence of a paradigm is worth the price. Historians ought to aim for a critical perspective and adherence to high epistemological standards. These are more important than having a unified historiography.

本文考察的是从20世纪30年代产生的所谓年鉴学派到80年代产生于美国的“新文化史”之间的历史思维与历史编撰中的一致性问题。直到20世纪早期,史学界一直假定历史研究很快会产生出统一的人类历史。但并非像阿克顿与伯里这些历史学家想象的那样,一致性很难实现。年鉴学派的史学家费弗尔和布罗代尔提出了“总体历史”的观念,力图全面描述具体的历史真实,如菲利普二世时期的地中海。但适得其反的是,这种撰写“总体”历史的努力却产生了非一致性。“新文化史”的推崇者放弃了总体历史的计划,并提出历史学家应当统一在这样那样的史学研究的“范式”之中。这些历史学家中最为纯熟的人(比如亨特,LynnHunt)承认范式的选择从根本上讲是随意性的。本文置疑将范式一致性加于史学之上是否值得。历史学家应当力图发展批判的视点,并遵循认识论的高标准。这些均比有一种统一的历史编撰重要。

 
<< 更多相关文摘    
图标索引 相关查询

 


 
CNKI小工具
在英文学术搜索中查有关new cultural history的内容
在知识搜索中查有关new cultural history的内容
在数字搜索中查有关new cultural history的内容
在概念知识元中查有关new cultural history的内容
在学术趋势中查有关new cultural history的内容
 
 

CNKI主页设CNKI翻译助手为主页 | 收藏CNKI翻译助手 | 广告服务 | 英文学术搜索
版权图标  2008 CNKI-中国知网
京ICP证040431号 互联网出版许可证 新出网证(京)字008号
北京市公安局海淀分局 备案号:110 1081725
版权图标 2008中国知网(cnki) 中国学术期刊(光盘版)电子杂志社