The courtroom trial, in the current essay, is viewed as a macro-speech act under which speech act sequences are grouped together to serve the speech act functions of, mainly, demanding, declaring, information securing, confirming, fact or opinion stating, requesting, persuading, referring, etc.
The basis of possibility ofsimplification of the structure of criminal procedure lies in that several procedures setting for fact investigation can be omitted when the facts of a case are clear and the evidence is reliable, but it is mainly the simplification of courtroom trial procedure.
As stipulated in the procedural law in China, a courtroom trial is procedurally initiated by the declaration of the subject matter,which, serving as the topic of courtroom discourse, reveals what the case is about;
Overinformative responding is understood as the dynamic process of providing additional or added information apart from the information literally necessary to the initiator's satisfaction in the ongoing question-response courtroom trial.
Imparts basic courtroom trial skills >amp; simulates intellectual, ethical, emotional >amp; physical demands of conducting a trial.
例句来源
The present paper is devoted to characterization of interaction patterns and their distri- bution among different interaction partners in Chinese courtroom trial in terms of "exchange" as mani- fested in 13 courtroom trials of different cases with the conclusion (1) that although "I(Q)-R" is the most frequent pattern, the interaction pattern varies as goal relations between participants vary, (2) that neither "three-step analysis"(I(Q) - R - F) nor "embedded structure" (Q - Qi - Ri -...