助手标题  
全文文献 工具书 数字 学术定义 翻译助手 学术趋势 更多
查询帮助
意见反馈
   relational balance 的翻译结果: 查询用时:0.182秒
图标索引 在分类学科中查询
所有学科
生物学
更多类别查询

图标索引 历史查询
 

relational balance
相关语句
  相似匹配句对
     Beauty of Balance
     平衡之美
短句来源
     Looking for the Balance
     寻找平衡点——对制定中国国际航空政策和发展战略的几点思考
短句来源
     The Balance Relational Ananalysis Between High Yield Corn Colony and Source Sink
     玉米高产群体与其源库平衡关系的分析
短句来源
     Identification algorithm of freeway steady-state speed-density balance relational expression
     高速公路稳态速度-密度平衡关系式辨识算法
     Nulls and N-Relational Algebra
     空值和N关系代数
短句来源
查询“relational balance”译词为用户自定义的双语例句

    我想查看译文中含有:的双语例句
例句
没有找到相关例句


Differential allocation of resources is a ubiquitous principle in both the natural environment and the human society. It brings about either balance among biological entities, which is represented by bio-diversity, or in-balance between human and other biological species that evolve to the disintegration of certain species and bio-singularity. While differential allocation of resources among humans and between human and other bio-species gives rise to inequality in life and, therefore, biological and social...

Differential allocation of resources is a ubiquitous principle in both the natural environment and the human society. It brings about either balance among biological entities, which is represented by bio-diversity, or in-balance between human and other biological species that evolve to the disintegration of certain species and bio-singularity. While differential allocation of resources among humans and between human and other bio-species gives rise to inequality in life and, therefore, biological and social crises, it also elevates humans above the rest of the biosphere and propels mankind to progress. As a result, sustainable development, which holds equality to life as a principle and intends to rid mankind of poverty, has also faced the philosophical predicament: mankind needs to live on, society has to move forward, and that requires the differential allocation of resources and subsequent in-equality to life. In the biosphere, resources are differentially allocated to various species according to the nutrition position known as food chain with the ″minimalist approach ″- least resources are allocated to each species. Between mankind and other species, maximum resources are allocated to humans due to unlimited demand and the overpowering advantage of humans in the ability to obtain resources. Among humans, social resources are differentially allocated according to systems, social structures and status, natural baselines, and historical inheritance. The privileged class of the populations, nations, and civilizations constantly expands this gap and differentiation from the disadvantageous class of the poor without restrains. Thus, the foundation of in-equality to life lies not in the differential allocation of resources itself, but in the lack of its restrains, especially in the area of differential maximum. Equality to life is not absolute in terms of resource allocation and limited differential allocation is actually necessary- sustainable development will escape its predicament in theory when relativity is equally granted to all lives. Ecological policy for implementing harmonious relationship between ″super group ″ and ″small group ″, between ″long surviving group ″ and ″short surviving group ″ will ensure resource sharing among generations (K-species), intra-generation usage (R-species), and therefore the generational balance of the ecosystem. The loss of relational balance in the ecosystem (the incompatibility between ″long surviving group ″ and ″super group ″), on the other hand, will create an on-going crisis of ecological pressure for mankind to avoid abolishment and racial sustenance. Evolution pressure is a necessity, development pressure is a rationale, but numerical and demand pressure is unethical and irrational. Unfortunately, human history has been one in which mankind has propelled itself from diversity to numerical expansion and demand explosion, a sharp contest to nature. Therefore, population reduction and human demand restraint have become the critical measure and avenue in restraining maximum differential allocation of resources, achieving life equality, and escaping from the philosophical predicament of sustainable development.

资源差异配置是自然界和人类社会的普遍原则。贯彻自然秩序受限制的资源最小化配置,带来了生物平等和多样性的最大化;以文化、社会等级为背景,不受限制的资源最大化配置,在使人成为人和推动社会发展的同时,又导致了生物多样性的最小化,造成人与生物、人与人的不平等,使以生命平等为宗旨和基础的可持续发展陷入伦理困境。从资源配置角度看,生命平等并非是绝对的,问题的症结不在于资源差异配置的存在,而在于有无对资源配置差异的限制。为进化、发展的差异配置是必要且合理的,而为支持人类庞大数量和贪婪的配置差异最大化则是必须予以限制的———由此,减少人口、节制欲望便成为实现生命平等,摆脱可持续发展伦理困境的必由之路和根本对策。

 
图标索引 相关查询

 


 
CNKI小工具
在英文学术搜索中查有关relational balance的内容
在知识搜索中查有关relational balance的内容
在数字搜索中查有关relational balance的内容
在概念知识元中查有关relational balance的内容
在学术趋势中查有关relational balance的内容
 
 

CNKI主页设CNKI翻译助手为主页 | 收藏CNKI翻译助手 | 广告服务 | 英文学术搜索
版权图标  2008 CNKI-中国知网
京ICP证040431号 互联网出版许可证 新出网证(京)字008号
北京市公安局海淀分局 备案号:110 1081725
版权图标 2008中国知网(cnki) 中国学术期刊(光盘版)电子杂志社