助手标题  
全文文献 工具书 数字 学术定义 翻译助手 学术趋势 更多
查询帮助
意见反馈
   stylistics schools 的翻译结果: 查询用时:0.183秒
图标索引 在分类学科中查询
所有学科
中国语言文字
更多类别查询

图标索引 历史查询
 

stylistics schools
相关语句
  文体学流派
     Classification of Stylistics Schools: Point of Departure, Frame of Reference, and Operation Plane
     文体学流派区分的出发点、参照系和作业面
短句来源
  相似匹配句对
     Schools in the U.S.A.
     美国的学校
短句来源
     Schools in America
     美国的学校
短句来源
     Classification of Stylistics Schools: Point of Departure, Frame of Reference, and Operation Plane
     文体学流派区分的出发点、参照系和作业面
短句来源
     On the Tradition of Chinese Stylistics
     论汉语风格学传统
短句来源
     The Interdisciplinary Features of Stylistics
     文学文体学:文学与语言学的交叉与融会
短句来源
查询“stylistics schools”译词为用户自定义的双语例句

    我想查看译文中含有:的双语例句
例句
没有找到相关例句


To clear up unnecessary confusion over classifying and naming stylistics schools, this paper suggests, first of all, building up and sticking to a basic point, a common point of departure — i.e. to proceed from the basic views on style and the various methodological approaches of stylistic analysis, so as to achieve a unified and stratified treatment of the stylistics schools; secondly, establishing a strict frame of reference for each of the schools, so as to define them in both intensive...

To clear up unnecessary confusion over classifying and naming stylistics schools, this paper suggests, first of all, building up and sticking to a basic point, a common point of departure — i.e. to proceed from the basic views on style and the various methodological approaches of stylistic analysis, so as to achieve a unified and stratified treatment of the stylistics schools; secondly, establishing a strict frame of reference for each of the schools, so as to define them in both intensive and extensive terms and distinguish them from other subjects of study as well as from each other; and thirdly, taking prototypical works by respective stylisticians as operation planes and examining their basic views and actual analyses, so as to place them in appropriately designated schools.

为澄清当前区分文体学流派中的某些不必要的混乱状况,本文建议从出发点、参照系、作业面三方面开展文体学流派区分的讨论。讨论问题,首先要确定一个基点,即出发点。同一著述中应有一个统一的出发点,不能变来变去。就现代文体学整个学科发展的要求来看,以文体观和方法论为出发点对文体学流派进行区分比较合理。它可以对众说纷纭的文体学派进行梳理,又可将不同层次的文体学派明确开来。对文体学流派的确认还有一个范围的问题,即建立参照系问题,须从内涵和外延两个方面对各个流派加以界定,指出它的中心区域和边缘区域,及其与相邻学科和流派的界限。同时,对具体文体学家的流派归属进行分析时还有一个角度的问题,即作业面选择的问题。对众多的文体学者进行归类,把文体学家的代表性论著作为作业面,分析他们的基本主张和实际操作,他们如果合于哪个流派的原型或与哪个学派原型接近,就可将他们划归于哪个学派。

 
图标索引 相关查询

 


 
CNKI小工具
在英文学术搜索中查有关stylistics schools的内容
在知识搜索中查有关stylistics schools的内容
在数字搜索中查有关stylistics schools的内容
在概念知识元中查有关stylistics schools的内容
在学术趋势中查有关stylistics schools的内容
 
 

CNKI主页设CNKI翻译助手为主页 | 收藏CNKI翻译助手 | 广告服务 | 英文学术搜索
版权图标  2008 CNKI-中国知网
京ICP证040431号 互联网出版许可证 新出网证(京)字008号
北京市公安局海淀分局 备案号:110 1081725
版权图标 2008中国知网(cnki) 中国学术期刊(光盘版)电子杂志社