助手标题  
全文文献 工具书 数字 学术定义 翻译助手 学术趋势 更多
查询帮助
意见反馈
   equal rights measures 的翻译结果: 查询用时:0.006秒
图标索引 在分类学科中查询
所有学科
法理、法史
更多类别查询

图标索引 历史查询
 

equal rights measures
相关语句
  “equal rights measures”译为未确定词的双语例句
     These two decisions confirm the Affirmative Action and the value of "racial diversity" and equal rights measures.
     据此 ,上述两项新判决 ,都有利于“种族多元化”和平权措施。
短句来源
  相似匹配句对
     On the Connotation of Constitutive Equal Rights
     论宪法平等权的内涵——以平等观念发展为视角
短句来源
     On Realization of Equal Rights for Compulsory Education
     论公民接受义务教育平等机会的实现
短句来源
     On The Rights to Environment
     论环境权
短句来源
     On Water Rights
     水权初探
     that of P is nearly equal;
     P地上几乎相等;
短句来源
查询“equal rights measures”译词为用户自定义的双语例句

    我想查看译文中含有:的双语例句
例句
没有找到相关例句


Since the 1970s, affirmative action in the U.S. has been challenged by the white. The white allege that this measure is racial discrimination against them, which, in turn, violates the Constitution's guarantee of equal rights. This constitutional dispute has been raised mostly on the issue of admission policy of several universities. Recently, the Supreme Court of the United States made two important decisions respectively on Grutter v. Bollinger case, in which the law school's admission policy in Michigan...

Since the 1970s, affirmative action in the U.S. has been challenged by the white. The white allege that this measure is racial discrimination against them, which, in turn, violates the Constitution's guarantee of equal rights. This constitutional dispute has been raised mostly on the issue of admission policy of several universities. Recently, the Supreme Court of the United States made two important decisions respectively on Grutter v. Bollinger case, in which the law school's admission policy in Michigan University is under question, and on Gratz v. Bollinger case, in which the undergraduate admission policy of Michigan University is under question. The petitioners sued the law school and the university by referring to Protection Clause provided in the 14 th Amendment of the Constitution. In applying the 14 th Amendment, the Supreme Court allows two important exceptions: either further governmental interests or remedy the historical discrimination. The Supreme Court then reaffirms that any governmental action based on racial classification is subject to "strict scrutiny" and shall be necessary to further a "compelling interest". These two decisions confirm the Affirmative Action and the value of "racial diversity" and equal rights measures. They are the most updated decisions of the constitutional dispute on Affirmative Action in the United States.

美国平权措施 ,从上一世纪七十年代以来 ,受到白人挑战 ,白人提出这是对白人的不平等 ,违反了宪法的平等权。这一宪法争议特别反映在大学入学政策上。近期 ,美国联邦最高法院对此作了两项判决 :一是“格鲁特对伯林杰”案 (Grutterv .Bollinger) ,针对密歇根大学法学院的入学政策 ;一是“格拉斯对伯林杰”案 (Gratzv.Bollinger) ,针对密歇根大学部的入学政策。平权措施主要宪法依据是美国宪法第 1 4条修正案。最高法院在适用此项宪法原则时有重要例外 ,一是为了保护国家利益出发 ;一是为弥补历史上的歧视后果。最高法院又宣布 ,凡使用种族作区分标准的法律 ,必须运用“严格的透视”和“紧迫的利益”。据此 ,上述两项新判决 ,都有利于“种族多元化”和平权措施。这是美国当前对平权措施宪法争议的最新认定。

 
图标索引 相关查询

 


 
CNKI小工具
在英文学术搜索中查有关equal rights measures的内容
在知识搜索中查有关equal rights measures的内容
在数字搜索中查有关equal rights measures的内容
在概念知识元中查有关equal rights measures的内容
在学术趋势中查有关equal rights measures的内容
 
 

CNKI主页设CNKI翻译助手为主页 | 收藏CNKI翻译助手 | 广告服务 | 英文学术搜索
版权图标  2008 CNKI-中国知网
京ICP证040431号 互联网出版许可证 新出网证(京)字008号
北京市公安局海淀分局 备案号:110 1081725
版权图标 2008中国知网(cnki) 中国学术期刊(光盘版)电子杂志社