助手标题  
全文文献 工具书 数字 学术定义 翻译助手 学术趋势 更多
查询帮助
意见反馈
   concrete administrative actions 的翻译结果: 查询用时:0.203秒
图标索引 在分类学科中查询
所有学科
行政学及国家行政管理
行政法及地方法制
更多类别查询

图标索引 历史查询
 

concrete administrative actions
相关语句
  具体行政行为
     The administration reconsider is an action which the administration reconsider institutions exam the applied concrete administrative actions legality and suitability according to the legal procedure brought out by the applicant's application, and make a reconsidering decision.
     行政复议是行政复议机关根据申请人的申请,依照法定程序对引起争议的被申请人的具体行政行为的合法性和适当性依法进行审查,并作出行政复议决定的活动。
短句来源
     After detailed demonstration,the author thinks that regulation of administrative divisions does not belong to concrete administrative actions but national actions.
     经过详细论证,认定行政区划调整不属于具体行政行为,而属于国家行为。
短句来源
  相似匹配句对
     concrete;
     混凝土;
短句来源
     The Economic Analysis of the Administrative Actions
     行政诉讼主要程序的经济分析
短句来源
     Unreasonable Administrative Actions and Supervision
     不合理行政行为及其监督
短句来源
     On the Concrete Application Principle of Administrative Penalty
     论行政处罚的“一事不再罚”原则
短句来源
     definite,concrete administrative acts to accuse;
     有明确、可诉的具体行政行为;
短句来源
查询“concrete administrative actions”译词为用户自定义的双语例句

    我想查看译文中含有:的双语例句
例句
没有找到相关例句


Objective Acceptance scope of administrative litigation refers to the scope of administrative litigation cases with judicial governing rights by the People's Court. It indicates which administrative actions citizens, juristic persons and other organizations can appeal to the people's court and which administrative actions the the people's court can exercise the judicial examination right to. Acceptance scope marks the ambit and relationship between the judicial right and administrative right and protection...

Objective Acceptance scope of administrative litigation refers to the scope of administrative litigation cases with judicial governing rights by the People's Court. It indicates which administrative actions citizens, juristic persons and other organizations can appeal to the people's court and which administrative actions the the people's court can exercise the judicial examination right to. Acceptance scope marks the ambit and relationship between the judicial right and administrative right and protection range and level to rights of citizens, juristic persons and other organizations as well. Administrative procedural law of China was constituted under immature conditions of the administrative litigation system with aspects unfit with each other at that time, so there are some limits to acceptation scope of administrative litigation. Nowadays, it's necessary to abolish those unsuitable limits. The narrow extension of concrete administrative actions restricts the acceptation scope of administrative litigation; examination to concrete administrative action as the examination object restricts the scope of administrative litigation to those concerning rights of the person and property rights. It has been imperative under the situation to break through the limitation of acceptation scope of administrative litigation, establish and perfect the administrative affairs, ensure timely and effective rescue after encroachment to legal rights in administrative management relations, protect the legal rights of citizens, juristic persons and other organizations and supervise in all aspects the administrative departments to exercise rights according to laws.

目的 研究我国行政诉讼现状 ,为进一步完善行政诉讼提供依据。方法 对浙江、云南、福建 3省 ,保定、台州、合肥 3市相关案件进行分析。结果 公民的诉讼意识、行政机关的法治意识都有了很大程度的提高 ,人民法院审理行政案件的经验在逐渐积累 ,人民法院对行政案件的承受力在逐步加大或增强。行政诉讼受案范围等需进一步发展。结论 建立和完善行政法律救济体制 ,保证行政相对人的人权和在行政管理关系中的合法权益受到行政主体侵犯后 ,能获得及时、有效的救济 ,充分保护公民、法人或其他组织的合法权益 ,全面监督行政机关依法行使职权己势在必行

From one dispute about regulation of administrative division that happened in Sichuan province,we propose two important legal questions.One is the legal nature of regulation of administrative division and the other is how to decide whether it is included in the scope of administrative litigation.There is little research available on the two problems.In this paper,the author first considers the legal nature of regulation of administrative division. After detailed demonstration,the author thinks that regulation...

From one dispute about regulation of administrative division that happened in Sichuan province,we propose two important legal questions.One is the legal nature of regulation of administrative division and the other is how to decide whether it is included in the scope of administrative litigation.There is little research available on the two problems.In this paper,the author first considers the legal nature of regulation of administrative division. After detailed demonstration,the author thinks that regulation of administrative divisions does not belong to concrete administrative actions but national actions.Secondly,because national actions can not be prosecuted,the regulation of administrative division does not fall in the scope of administrative litigation.

由四川省一起行政区划调整纠纷引申出法学领域的两个重要问题———行政区划调整的法律性质如何界定和行政区划调整是否属于行政诉讼受案范围。对于这两个问题,目前学术界鲜有研究。为此,界定了行政区划调整的法律性质。经过详细论证,认定行政区划调整不属于具体行政行为,而属于国家行为。其次,基于国家行为的不可诉性,行政区划调整不属于行政诉讼的受案范围。

“Auforefois Conzect" Principle is one of the fundamental rules of administrative penalty in China, and the main purpose of this principle is to standardize the enforcement organization's concrete administrative actions and protect litigant's legal rights and interests.However, there are some questions about its definitions and application, especially about its special patterns and concrete practize. So it is pretty necessary to make a further inquiry and probe into its connotation and some problems...

“Auforefois Conzect" Principle is one of the fundamental rules of administrative penalty in China, and the main purpose of this principle is to standardize the enforcement organization's concrete administrative actions and protect litigant's legal rights and interests.However, there are some questions about its definitions and application, especially about its special patterns and concrete practize. So it is pretty necessary to make a further inquiry and probe into its connotation and some problems of administrative penalty in practice in the light of some basic theories of administrative law.

一事不再罚原则是我国行政处罚的基本原则之一,其设立的宗旨在于规范执法机关具体行政行为,维护相对人合法权益。但是,目前关于一事不再罚原则的具体界定和适用,特别是对一事不再罚的特殊表现形态的认识和具体实践还存在一定的问题,因此对其内涵进行积极探索,并结合行政法基本理论对实践中行政处罚问题作一探讨是必要的。

 
<< 更多相关文摘    
图标索引 相关查询

 


 
CNKI小工具
在英文学术搜索中查有关concrete administrative actions的内容
在知识搜索中查有关concrete administrative actions的内容
在数字搜索中查有关concrete administrative actions的内容
在概念知识元中查有关concrete administrative actions的内容
在学术趋势中查有关concrete administrative actions的内容
 
 

CNKI主页设CNKI翻译助手为主页 | 收藏CNKI翻译助手 | 广告服务 | 英文学术搜索
版权图标  2008 CNKI-中国知网
京ICP证040431号 互联网出版许可证 新出网证(京)字008号
北京市公安局海淀分局 备案号:110 1081725
版权图标 2008中国知网(cnki) 中国学术期刊(光盘版)电子杂志社