助手标题  
全文文献 工具书 数字 学术定义 翻译助手 学术趋势 更多
查询帮助
意见反馈
   judgments of causal power 的翻译结果: 查询用时:0.174秒
图标索引 在分类学科中查询
所有学科
更多类别查询

图标索引 历史查询
 

judgments of causal power
相关语句
  因果力判断
     A Review on the Research in Judgments of Causal Power of Single Causal Relationships
     单一因果关系因果力判断研究述评
短句来源
     Lastly, The author reviewed the basic problems of research on judgments of causal power of single causal relationships: the main impact factors and the mechanism of judgments of causal power, the methodological problem of the main research.
     最后,概述了单一因果关系因果力判断研究的基本问题:因果力判断的主要影响因素和过程机制、研究的方法问题。
短句来源
  “judgments of causal power”译为未确定词的双语例句
     It was found that judgments of causal power of single causal relationships had the four characteristics: (a) More judgments were in accord with the Power PC theory in preventive causes, but conversely most judgments were in accord with probabilistic contrast model in generative causes;
     结果发现 ,对单一因果关系因果力估计具有以下 4个特点 :⑴不对称性 :在预防原因条件下的因果力估计较多符合效力PC理论 ,而在产生原因条件下的因果力估计一般符合概率对比模型 ;
短句来源
     (b) the representations of literal presentation, tables and graphs had no impact on the judgments of causal power in generative causes, but had the impact on that in preventive causes where more participants' judgments were in accord with the Power PC theory in the representation of graphs, compared with the representations of literal presentation and tables;
     ⑵文字陈述、表格和图形三种信息外部表征方式 ,不影响产生原因条件下的因果力估计 ,但影响预防原因条件下的因果力估计。 在预防原因条件下 ,与文字陈述和表格表征相比 ,图形表征会促使更多被试按效力PC理论来做因果力估计 ;
短句来源
  相似匹配句对
     Research on causality judgments
     因果关系的判断
短句来源
     Judgments of Linguistic Acceptability
     语言可接受性判断
短句来源
     Identification and Appraisal of Intergenericity in Judgments
     判决书体裁互文性之鉴衡
短句来源
     Instruction in Equilibrium Judgments and Requirements
     谈“平衡判据与平衡条件”的教学
短句来源
     On the Enforcement Power of Civil Judgments
     民事执行权论
短句来源
查询“judgments of causal power”译词为用户自定义的双语例句

    我想查看译文中含有:的双语例句
例句
没有找到相关例句


The Power PC theory was tested by using the concentrative presentation of graph representation of information and the paradigm of comparing causal power. The participants were 233 college students. The results showed that comparative judgments of causal power of single causal relationships had the following characteristics: (a) Most judgments were in accord with the Power PC theory in the conditions of preventive causes, but conversely most judgments were not in accord with the...

The Power PC theory was tested by using the concentrative presentation of graph representation of information and the paradigm of comparing causal power. The participants were 233 college students. The results showed that comparative judgments of causal power of single causal relationships had the following characteristics: (a) Most judgments were in accord with the Power PC theory in the conditions of preventive causes, but conversely most judgments were not in accord with the theory in the conditions of generative causes, (b) in the condition of generative causes with simultaneous changes of the covariation coefficient and the base rate of the effect, most participants used the ΔP rule of probabilistic contrast model, which was not in accord with the Power PC theory, and (c) in the condition of generative causes with the change of the base rate of the effect and the constant covariation coefficient, most participants used the RP rule, which couldn't be explained by all known theories of causal reasoning.

在用图形方式集中呈现信息的条件下 ,用因果力大小比较的实验范式检验效力PC理论。 2 33名大学生被试对不同化学药物影响动物基因变异的能力做大小比较判断。结果发现 ,对单一因果关系因果力大小的比较判断具有以下 3个特点 :(1)不对称性 :在预防原因条件下的因果力判断一般符合效力PC理论 ,而在产生原因条件下的因果力判断一般不符合效力PC理论 ;(2 )在同时变化协变值ΔP和结果基率ΔP(E|~C)的产生原因条件下 ,多数被试使用ΔP规则。这与概率对比模型的预测相一致 ,而不支持效力PC理论 ;(3)在固定协变值ΔP而只变化结果基率P(E|~C)的产生原因条件下 ,多数被试使用变异比RP规则。这是目前所有的因果推理理论都不能解释的现象。

The author reviewed the main theoretical models of simple causal induction from the two aspects of bottom-up data-driven processing and top-down knowledge-driven processing. Within the paradigm of bottom-up data-driven processing, there are the basic differences between associative accounts and computational accounts. Lastly, The author reviewed the basic problems of research on judgments of causal power of single causal relationships: the main impact factors and the mechanism of judgments of...

The author reviewed the main theoretical models of simple causal induction from the two aspects of bottom-up data-driven processing and top-down knowledge-driven processing. Within the paradigm of bottom-up data-driven processing, there are the basic differences between associative accounts and computational accounts. Lastly, The author reviewed the basic problems of research on judgments of causal power of single causal relationships: the main impact factors and the mechanism of judgments of causal power, the methodological problem of the main research.

简单因果归纳包括自下而上的材料驱动的加工和自上而下的因果知识驱动加工两个方面。简单因果归纳的多数理论模型强调自下而上的材料驱动的加工,这些模型又存在联想解释与计算解释的基本区分。最后,概述了单一因果关系因果力判断研究的基本问题:因果力判断的主要影响因素和过程机制、研究的方法问题。

An experiment was conducted to investigate human causal judgments in the concentrative presentation of information with the three different external representations and the paradigm of direct estimates of causal power, and to test the Power PC theory, Probabilistic Contrast Model, and pCI rule. The participants were 287 college students. It was found that judgments of causal power of single causal relationships had the four characteristics: (a) More judgments were in accord with the Power...

An experiment was conducted to investigate human causal judgments in the concentrative presentation of information with the three different external representations and the paradigm of direct estimates of causal power, and to test the Power PC theory, Probabilistic Contrast Model, and pCI rule. The participants were 287 college students. It was found that judgments of causal power of single causal relationships had the four characteristics: (a) More judgments were in accord with the Power PC theory in preventive causes, but conversely most judgments were in accord with probabilistic contrast model in generative causes; (b) the representations of literal presentation, tables and graphs had no impact on the judgments of causal power in generative causes, but had the impact on that in preventive causes where more participants' judgments were in accord with the Power PC theory in the representation of graphs, compared with the representations of literal presentation and tables; (c) no participant used pCI rule; and (d) there were obvious individual differences in causal judgments.

在分别用文字陈述、表格和图形三种外部表征方式集中呈现因果信息的条件下 ,用直接估计因果力大小的实验范式考察单一因果关系因果力估计的特点 ,检验概率对比模型 ,效力PC理论和 pCI规则。让 2 87名大学生被试估计不同化学药物影响动物基因变异的能力。结果发现 ,对单一因果关系因果力估计具有以下 4个特点 :⑴不对称性 :在预防原因条件下的因果力估计较多符合效力PC理论 ,而在产生原因条件下的因果力估计一般符合概率对比模型 ;⑵文字陈述、表格和图形三种信息外部表征方式 ,不影响产生原因条件下的因果力估计 ,但影响预防原因条件下的因果力估计。在预防原因条件下 ,与文字陈述和表格表征相比 ,图形表征会促使更多被试按效力PC理论来做因果力估计 ;⑶没有被试使用 pCI规则 ;⑷被试估计因果力所使用的规则存在明显的个体差异。

 
图标索引 相关查询

 


 
CNKI小工具
在英文学术搜索中查有关judgments of causal power的内容
在知识搜索中查有关judgments of causal power的内容
在数字搜索中查有关judgments of causal power的内容
在概念知识元中查有关judgments of causal power的内容
在学术趋势中查有关judgments of causal power的内容
 
 

CNKI主页设CNKI翻译助手为主页 | 收藏CNKI翻译助手 | 广告服务 | 英文学术搜索
版权图标  2008 CNKI-中国知网
京ICP证040431号 互联网出版许可证 新出网证(京)字008号
北京市公安局海淀分局 备案号:110 1081725
版权图标 2008中国知网(cnki) 中国学术期刊(光盘版)电子杂志社