Recently, with the prosperity of Pragmatics, English rhetorical questions are analyzed as results of linguistic communications influenced by various pragmatic factors, either from the angle of speech act, cooperation and politeness principle, discourse analysis, or relevance theory, thus enriching the relevant studies.
In order to further test Kaplan's (1966) views about the differences between the Chinese and the English rhetorical patterns, a contrastive study of argumentative texts in Chinese and English has been conducted.
With regards to the everlasting charm of the English proverbs, there are various reasons, the most important of which is the extensive use of English rhetorical devices.
A good command of English requires a good knowledge of the varied English rhetorical devices, of which metaphor and personification are the two frequently used. Metaphor makes use of the similarity or similarities between two things: instead of saying something directly, it implies or suggests indirectly on the basis of comparison. Personification, on the other hand, helps achieve impressiveness and vividness of expression by providing the animal with human traits, feelings or activities; or by animating...
A good command of English requires a good knowledge of the varied English rhetorical devices, of which metaphor and personification are the two frequently used. Metaphor makes use of the similarity or similarities between two things: instead of saying something directly, it implies or suggests indirectly on the basis of comparison. Personification, on the other hand, helps achieve impressiveness and vividness of expression by providing the animal with human traits, feelings or activities; or by animating the inanimate.
There has been an increasing interest in the concept of “China English” and the contribution of its study to the issue of “World Englishes”. Through a small scaled empirical study, this paper describes and analyzes, at a discourse level, how different groups of raters perceive and assess “China English” rhetorical patterns, i.e., the first language (Chinese) bond paragraphing, in Chinese EFL student writers' examination essays. It also explores the influence of “China English” on and...
There has been an increasing interest in the concept of “China English” and the contribution of its study to the issue of “World Englishes”. Through a small scaled empirical study, this paper describes and analyzes, at a discourse level, how different groups of raters perceive and assess “China English” rhetorical patterns, i.e., the first language (Chinese) bond paragraphing, in Chinese EFL student writers' examination essays. It also explores the influence of “China English” on and the implications for writing assessment.
In order to further test Kaplan's (1966) views about the differences between the Chinese and the English rhetorical patterns, a contrastive study of argumentative texts in Chinese and English has been conducted. Eight Chinese and eight English argumentative texts were chosen and grouped according to the similarity of their topics. They were analyzed and compared in thematic progression, semantic cohesion, as well as paragraph development. The results of the study reveal some differences between...
In order to further test Kaplan's (1966) views about the differences between the Chinese and the English rhetorical patterns, a contrastive study of argumentative texts in Chinese and English has been conducted. Eight Chinese and eight English argumentative texts were chosen and grouped according to the similarity of their topics. They were analyzed and compared in thematic progression, semantic cohesion, as well as paragraph development. The results of the study reveal some differences between Chinese and English in all those aspects and, at the same time, suggest that rhetorical patterns in the two languages (particularly in Chinese) seem to be more complicated and diversified than what Kaplan has thought.
english rhetorical
英语修辞
查询“english rhetorical”译词为用户自定义的双语例句
相关查询
2008 CNKI－中国知网